Taxi calculator? (propeller type and speed, aircraft weight, taxi speed)

"Flaps_50!" moreflaps gmail.com wrote:

John Doe j... usenetlove.invalid wrote:

Is there such a calculation/formula? How can you tell what
propeller to use, how fast it should rotate, and how much weight
it can push along the ground?

Specifically... I would like to tell what sort and size of
propeller rotating at what speed, in calm air to push 100 or 200
pounds on smooth and level pavement with zero rolling resistance
to about 20 mph.


20 mph is too fast for taxying.

Okay then, use 10 mph.

What are you asking about -zero rolling resistance????

Providing givens is common when asking for a calculation. By
suggesting zero rolling resistance, I was trying to make it easier
or at least achievable for anyone who has a clue. The fact that
you do not have a clue is useful information, but I could have
figured that out without your babbling.
--




















Cheers

see also Google Groups
Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com! news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!postnews.go ogle.com!o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Flaps_50!" moreflaps gmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.av iation.homebuilt
Subject: Taxi calculator? (propeller type and speed, aircraft weight, taxi speed)
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 15
Message-ID: fcb480ce-e285-47c4-87dc-8a9257583974 o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com
References: 4d4b324f$0$26911$c3e8da3$33881b6a news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 125.237.11.218
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1296899814 21734 127.0.0.1 (5 Feb 2011 09:56:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:56:54 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
Injection-Info: o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=125.237.11.218; posting-account=6xbCsQoAAADFV3zSSyqtlmEntvryq9MZ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/8.0.552.237 Safari/534.10,gzip(gfe)

On Feb 5, 3:20*pm, John Doe wrote:
"Flaps_50!" moreflaps gmail.com wrote:
...
What are you asking about -zero rolling resistance????

Providing givens is common when asking for a calculation. By
suggesting zero rolling resistance, I was trying to make it easier
or at least achievable for anyone who has a clue. The fact that
you do not have a clue is useful information, but I could have
figured that out without your babbling.
--

Seems like you really deserve the responses you are getting from the
mechanical experts in rec.crafts.metalworking.

Jim Wilkins kb1dal gmail.com wrote:

John Doe j... usenetlove.invalid wrote:
"Flaps_50!" moreflaps gmail.com wrote:

What are you asking about -zero rolling resistance????

Providing givens is common when asking for a calculation. By
suggesting zero rolling resistance, I was trying to make it
easier or at least achievable for anyone who has a clue. The
fact that you do not have a clue is useful information, but I
could have figured that out without your babbling.

Seems like you really deserve the responses you are getting from
the mechanical experts in rec.crafts.metalworking.

Definitely, in various groups. I enjoyed the replies about my most
recent bearings question. Also enjoyed some of the replies about
my recent "T-drive" question.

Some engineers fly aircraft, not all pilots are simpletons, and
others are smart enough. If someone does not know the answer to a
tough question, that does not exclude the entire group. So who
needs to know that you're an idiot?

Personally, I do not mind your babbling, but it is just noise to
anyone looking for information in the archive (assuming someday
Google Groups stops trashing the UseNet archive search). If Google
Groups makes the UseNet archive entirely useless, your babbling
will have less impact since there won't be any way to retrieve
useful information from the archive anyway.

Oh wail.
--




















See also Google Groups
Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com! npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!x3g2000yqj.googlegro ups.com!not-for-mail
From: Jim Wilkins kb1dal gmail.com
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.av iation.homebuilt
Subject: Taxi calculator? (propeller type and speed, aircraft weight, taxi speed)
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 13:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 15
Message-ID: af01f10c-b720-499e-8cb6-6710038c9217 x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com
References: 4d4b324f$0$26911$c3e8da3$33881b6a news.astraweb.com fcb480ce-e285-47c4-87dc-8a9257583974 o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com 4d4db0f2$0$29578$c3e8da3$92d0a893 news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.233.128.125
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1296940165 31885 127.0.0.1 (5 Feb 2011 21:09:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:09:25 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse google.com
Injection-Info: x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=4.233.128.125; posting-account=uJ_OVwoAAACkzDtuixjW5ZglsAOckb0n
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0),gzip(gfe)

On 2/5/2011 2:41 PM, John Doe wrote:
Jim Wilkinskb1dal gmail.com wrote:

John Doej... usenetlove.invalid wrote:
"Flaps_50!"moreflaps gmail.com wrote:

What are you asking about -zero rolling resistance????

Providing givens is common when asking for a calculation. By
suggesting zero rolling resistance, I was trying to make it
easier or at least achievable for anyone who has a clue. The
fact that you do not have a clue is useful information, but I
could have figured that out without your babbling.

Seems like you really deserve the responses you are getting from
the mechanical experts in rec.crafts.metalworking.

Definitely, in various groups. I enjoyed the replies about my most
recent bearings question. Also enjoyed some of the replies about
my recent "T-drive" question.

Some engineers fly aircraft, not all pilots are simpletons, and
others are smart enough. If someone does not know the answer to a
tough question, that does not exclude the entire group. So who
needs to know that you're an idiot?

Personally, I do not mind your babbling, but it is just noise to
anyone looking for information in the archive (assuming someday
Google Groups stops trashing the UseNet archive search). If Google
Groups makes the UseNet archive entirely useless, your babbling
will have less impact since there won't be any way to retrieve
useful information from the archive anyway.

Oh wail.

Considering I made a bit of a living working on Props and
Propulsion both Turboprop and Recip, I find you never gave enough
intelligent information for any kind of conclusion. I have
watched this "Discussion" regress into a slugfest and for what?
You presented an incomplete problem and NO Engineer of any kind
will approach it with any kind of a definitive answer. At least
one other person wanted more info. What he got was the old "Talk
Around" routine.

Here is my answer. Eat lots of Beans, shove a funnel up your
kiester and see just how fast you can get your tricycle to go.

Daryl Hunt dhunt nspami70west.com wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Jim Wilkinskb1dal gmail.com wrote:
John Doej... usenetlove.invalid wrote:
"Flaps_50!"moreflaps gmail.com wrote:

What are you asking about -zero rolling resistance????

Providing givens is common when asking for a calculation. By
suggesting zero rolling resistance, I was trying to make it
easier or at least achievable for anyone who has a clue. The
fact that you do not have a clue is useful information, but I
could have figured that out without your babbling.

Seems like you really deserve the responses you are getting from
the mechanical experts in rec.crafts.metalworking.

Definitely, in various groups. I enjoyed the replies about my most
recent bearings question. Also enjoyed some of the replies about
my recent "T-drive" question.

Some engineers fly aircraft, not all pilots are simpletons, and
others are smart enough. If someone does not know the answer to a
tough question, that does not exclude the entire group. So who
needs to know that you're an idiot?

Personally, I do not mind your babbling, but it is just noise to
anyone looking for information in the archive (assuming someday
Google Groups stops trashing the UseNet archive search). If Google
Groups makes the UseNet archive entirely useless, your babbling
will have less impact since there won't be any way to retrieve
useful information from the archive anyway.

Oh wail.

Considering I made a bit of a living working on Props and
Propulsion both Turboprop and Recip, I find you never gave enough
intelligent information for any kind of conclusion.

Bull****.

I have watched this "Discussion" regress into a slugfest and for
what? You presented an incomplete problem and NO Engineer of any
kind will approach it with any kind of a definitive answer. At
least one other person wanted more info. What he got was the
old "Talk Around" routine.

Here is my answer. Eat lots of Beans, shove a funnel up your
kiester and see just how fast you can get your tricycle to go.

I will ask your mother for tips.
--



















Nym-shifting
Path: news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com! npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe06.iad.POSTED!07292e74!not-for-mail
From: Daryl Hunt dhunt nspami70west.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.av iation.homebuilt
Subject: Taxi calculator? (propeller type and speed, aircraft weight, taxi speed)
References: 4d4b324f$0$26911$c3e8da3$33881b6a news.astraweb.com fcb480ce-e285-47c4-87dc-8a9257583974 o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com 4d4db0f2$0$29578$c3e8da3$92d0a893 news.astraweb.com af01f10c-b720-499e-8cb6-6710038c9217 x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com 4d4dc411$0$1542$c3e8da3$40d4fd75 news.astraweb.com
In-Reply-To: 4d4dc411$0$1542$c3e8da3$40d4fd75 news.astraweb.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 48
Message-ID: lPj3p.69559$Y8.62149 newsfe06.iad
X-Complaints-To: abuse teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 22:04:01 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:03:54 -0700

On 2/5/2011 3:13 PM, John Doe wrote:
Daryl Huntdhunt nspami70west.com wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Jim Wilkinskb1dal gmail.com wrote:
John Doej... usenetlove.invalid wrote:
"Flaps_50!"moreflaps gmail.com wrote:

What are you asking about -zero rolling resistance????

Providing givens is common when asking for a calculation. By
suggesting zero rolling resistance, I was trying to make it
easier or at least achievable for anyone who has a clue. The
fact that you do not have a clue is useful information, but I
could have figured that out without your babbling.

Seems like you really deserve the responses you are getting from
the mechanical experts in rec.crafts.metalworking.

Definitely, in various groups. I enjoyed the replies about my most
recent bearings question. Also enjoyed some of the replies about
my recent "T-drive" question.

Some engineers fly aircraft, not all pilots are simpletons, and
others are smart enough. If someone does not know the answer to a
tough question, that does not exclude the entire group. So who
needs to know that you're an idiot?

Personally, I do not mind your babbling, but it is just noise to
anyone looking for information in the archive (assuming someday
Google Groups stops trashing the UseNet archive search). If Google
Groups makes the UseNet archive entirely useless, your babbling
will have less impact since there won't be any way to retrieve
useful information from the archive anyway.

Oh wail.

Considering I made a bit of a living working on Props and
Propulsion both Turboprop and Recip, I find you never gave enough
intelligent information for any kind of conclusion.

Bull****.

I have watched this "Discussion" regress into a slugfest and for
what? You presented an incomplete problem and NO Engineer of any
kind will approach it with any kind of a definitive answer. At
least one other person wanted more info. What he got was the
old "Talk Around" routine.

Here is my answer. Eat lots of Beans, shove a funnel up your
kiester and see just how fast you can get your tricycle to go.

I will ask your mother for tips.

Thank for making my point for me.

Daryl Hunt dhunt nspami70west.com wrote:

Thank for making my point for me.

Why do you post so much noise and then whine about too much noise,
****?

And by the way, ****, are you a spammer? What other nyms do you
use?

On Feb 6, 11:03*am, Daryl Hunt wrote:
On 2/5/2011 2:41 PM, John Doe wrote:









Jim Wilkinskb1dal gmail.com *wrote:

John Doej... usenetlove.invalid *wrote:
"Flaps_50!"moreflaps gmail.com *wrote:

What are you asking about -zero rolling resistance????

Providing givens is common when asking for a calculation. By
suggesting zero rolling resistance, I was trying to make it
easier or at least achievable for anyone who has a clue. The
fact that you do not have a clue is useful information, but I
could have figured that out without your babbling.

Seems like you really deserve the responses you are getting from
the mechanical experts in rec.crafts.metalworking.

Definitely, in various groups. I enjoyed the replies about my most
recent bearings question. Also enjoyed some of the replies about
my recent "T-drive" question.

Some engineers fly aircraft, not all pilots are simpletons, and
others are smart enough. If someone does not know the answer to a
tough question, that does not exclude the entire group. So who
needs to know that you're an idiot?

Personally, I do not mind your babbling, but it is just noise to
anyone looking for information in the archive (assuming someday
Google Groups stops trashing the UseNet archive search). If Google
Groups makes the UseNet archive entirely useless, your babbling
will have less impact since there won't be any way to retrieve
useful information from the archive anyway.

Oh wail.

Considering I made a bit of a living working on Props and
Propulsion both Turboprop and Recip, I find you never gave enough
intelligent information for any kind of conclusion. *I have
watched this "Discussion" regress into a slugfest and for what?
You presented an incomplete problem and NO Engineer of any kind
will approach it with any kind of a definitive answer. *At least
one other person wanted more info. *What he got was the old "Talk
Around" routine.

Here is my answer. *Eat lots of Beans, shove a funnel up your
kiester and see just how fast you can get your tricycle to go.

LOL!

"Flaps_50!" moreflaps gmail.com wrote:

....

LOL!

You just quoted sixty lines of text for a one-word hackneyed insult.

On Feb 6, 9:20*am, John Doe wrote:
"Flaps_50!" moreflaps gmail.com wrote:
John Doe j... usenetlove.invalid wrote:
Is there such a calculation/formula? How can you tell what
propeller to use, how fast it should rotate, and how much weight
it can push along the ground?

Specifically... I would like to tell what sort and size of
propeller rotating at what speed, in calm air to push 100 or 200
pounds on smooth and level pavement with zero rolling resistance
to about 20 mph.

20 mph is too fast for taxying.

Okay then, use 10 mph.

What are you asking about -zero rolling resistance????

Providing givens is common when asking for a calculation. By
suggesting zero rolling resistance, I was trying to make it easier
or at least achievable for anyone who has a clue. The fact that
you do not have a clue is useful information, but I could have
figured that out without your babbling.
--

Hmm. What do you think makes it hard to push a plane -zero rolling
resistance? Don't be so rude when you don't know how to frame a
problem properly. Describe the problem properly and someone may be
able to help you but after your rude response it won't be me.