![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 9:00*am, Mike the Strike wrote:
On Feb 14, 10:29*pm, John Cochrane wrote: I wrote a "contest corner" for April Soaring Magazine explaining some of the contest rules changes for 2011. You can see it now on my webpage, http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...Papers/rules_1... I hope this clarifies some of the things that we're trying to do this year, and raises awareness of some of the changes. There ARE some things you need to know! John Cochrane John: You've definitely addressed some of the issues that some of us have been griping about, but I wonder if it doesn't introduce even more rule complexity? *One thing we hear from newcomers is that you never know who has won until the scorer completes his task. *Even then, we have found mistakes to occur through the sheer complexity of everything. While I am looking forward to Flarm as a leeching tool, I doubt that it will be very useful out west. *I have often flown towards a couple of rapidly-rising sailplanes to find that there is little lift beneath them. *If you don't catch the thermal main bubble out here, you're often too late. *I suspect that it won't be much of a game changer, at least in our region. I have never understood why Americans have been so singularly against team flying, especially when it is an important tool used at World competitions that puts the USA at a distinct disadvantage. *I don't know about your club, but our informal cross-country flights are very cooperative and don't jam the radio with chatter. Tucson Soaring Club is hosting a cross-country camp in May to encourage and mentor new pilots and to provide a non-competitive (and less confusing) venue than a contest. *It isn't intended to replace contests but complement them. *We'll let you know how it goes. Mike Scoring complexity and obscurity is on the agenda. No change for this year, but the stew is simmering John Cochrane |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 8:29*am, John Cochrane
wrote: On Feb 15, 9:00*am, Mike the Strike wrote: On Feb 14, 10:29*pm, John Cochrane wrote: I wrote a "contest corner" for April Soaring Magazine explaining some of the contest rules changes for 2011. You can see it now on my webpage, http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...Papers/rules_1.... I hope this clarifies some of the things that we're trying to do this year, and raises awareness of some of the changes. There ARE some things you need to know! John Cochrane John: You've definitely addressed some of the issues that some of us have been griping about, but I wonder if it doesn't introduce even more rule complexity? *One thing we hear from newcomers is that you never know who has won until the scorer completes his task. *Even then, we have found mistakes to occur through the sheer complexity of everything. While I am looking forward to Flarm as a leeching tool, I doubt that it will be very useful out west. *I have often flown towards a couple of rapidly-rising sailplanes to find that there is little lift beneath them. *If you don't catch the thermal main bubble out here, you're often too late. *I suspect that it won't be much of a game changer, at least in our region. I have never understood why Americans have been so singularly against team flying, especially when it is an important tool used at World competitions that puts the USA at a distinct disadvantage. *I don't know about your club, but our informal cross-country flights are very cooperative and don't jam the radio with chatter. Tucson Soaring Club is hosting a cross-country camp in May to encourage and mentor new pilots and to provide a non-competitive (and less confusing) venue than a contest. *It isn't intended to replace contests but complement them. *We'll let you know how it goes. Mike Scoring complexity and obscurity is on the agenda. No change for this year, but the stew is simmering John Cochrane John thanks for the summary. I am looking at this from the scorers stand point as I will be scoring the 15 meter Nationals and the regional competition that will be running along side it. Can you shed any light on how WinScore will be changed to handle multiple sets of handicaps? We will set it up similar to when we combine standard, 15m and 18m ships in a single class? Thanks in advance and looking forward to meeting you in Logan this year! Ron Gleason |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 9:43*am, Ron Gleason wrote:
On Feb 15, 8:29*am, John Cochrane wrote: On Feb 15, 9:00*am, Mike the Strike wrote: On Feb 14, 10:29*pm, John Cochrane wrote: I wrote a "contest corner" for April Soaring Magazine explaining some of the contest rules changes for 2011. You can see it now on my webpage, http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...Papers/rules_1... I hope this clarifies some of the things that we're trying to do this year, and raises awareness of some of the changes. There ARE some things you need to know! John Cochrane John: You've definitely addressed some of the issues that some of us have been griping about, but I wonder if it doesn't introduce even more rule complexity? *One thing we hear from newcomers is that you never know who has won until the scorer completes his task. *Even then, we have found mistakes to occur through the sheer complexity of everything. While I am looking forward to Flarm as a leeching tool, I doubt that it will be very useful out west. *I have often flown towards a couple of rapidly-rising sailplanes to find that there is little lift beneath them. *If you don't catch the thermal main bubble out here, you're often too late. *I suspect that it won't be much of a game changer, at least in our region. I have never understood why Americans have been so singularly against team flying, especially when it is an important tool used at World competitions that puts the USA at a distinct disadvantage. *I don't know about your club, but our informal cross-country flights are very cooperative and don't jam the radio with chatter. Tucson Soaring Club is hosting a cross-country camp in May to encourage and mentor new pilots and to provide a non-competitive (and less confusing) venue than a contest. *It isn't intended to replace contests but complement them. *We'll let you know how it goes. Mike Scoring complexity and obscurity is on the agenda. No change for this year, but the stew is simmering John Cochrane John thanks for the summary. *I am looking at this from the scorers stand point as I will be scoring the 15 meter Nationals and the regional competition that will be running along side it. *Can you shed any light on how WinScore will be changed to handle multiple sets of handicaps? *We will set it up similar to when we combine standard, 15m and 18m ships in a single class? Thanks in advance and looking forward to meeting you in Logan this year! Ron Gleason No, the "multiple handicapped" classes use standard handicaps, not the fixed 2% of "combined FAI" classes. The mulitple classes are run exactly on sports class rules, so winscore should be simple. If water is allowed in a handicapped class, you use the scratch handcap with no weight adjustment. Have fun scoring, and thanks for volunteering! John Cochrane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2011 USA Proposed Competition Rules Changes Posted. | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 22 | December 31st 10 02:54 PM |
US Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 0 | December 1st 06 01:36 AM |
US Rules Committee Election and Rules Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 1 | September 27th 05 10:52 PM |
FLASH! U.S.A. Rules Committee to Address Rules Complexity? | SoarPoint | Soaring | 1 | February 3rd 04 02:36 AM |
New SRA Site - New 2003 Rules Minutes and 2004 Rules Summary | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 0 | December 17th 03 03:38 AM |