![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 3, 8:28*pm, Dave White wrote:
This is the article from the EAA newsletter: http://www.ksallink.com/?cmd=display...13&format=html This is the manufacturer: http://www.aaicorp.com Wonder if they might consider adapting this thing to gliders? Manufacturer link is actually: http://sagetechcorp.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope...the market is too small. I asked them at a trade show. It's
meant for UAVs. That market is small, too, in terms of volume, but they can charge a lot...UAV makers are less price sensitive than glider owners. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other than a few thousand dollars, what's the difference between their
"conventional manned installation" and "adapted to gliders"? Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 02:42 04 March 2011, JS wrote:
This looks a lot like the Trig 21 which I have had fitted in a powered plane for about 18 months and am very happy with. http://www.trig-avionics.com/library/TT2xBrochure.pdf This link should take you to their website. Other than a few thousand dollars, what's the difference between their "conventional manned installation" and "adapted to gliders"? Jim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am 04.03.11 13:01, schrieb Nigel Cottrell:
This looks a lot like the Trig 21 which I have had fitted in a powered plane for about 18 months and am very happy with. http://www.trig-avionics.com/library/TT2xBrochure.pdf The TT21 is a class 2 transponder and therefore *not* suited for gliders. If you choose to go with Trig, then do yourself a favour and buy the TT22. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 6:49*am, John Smith wrote:
The TT21 is a class 2 transponder and therefore *not* suited for gliders. If you choose to go with Trig, then do yourself a favour and buy the TT22. Please explain your reasoning for this statement. This seems to be a minority view, at least in the US. Cheers, Kirk 66 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 5:51*am, "kirk.stant" wrote:
On Mar 4, 6:49*am, John Smith wrote: The TT21 is a class 2 transponder and therefore *not* suited for gliders. If you choose to go with Trig, then do yourself a favour and buy the TT22. Please explain your reasoning for this statement. This seems to be a minority view, at least in the US. Cheers, Kirk 66 Class 2 is only 'legal' to 15,000 feet. The extra wattage of a class 1 is 'legally' required to fly above 15,000. Frankly it doesn't make any sense to me. In my limited experience, the higher you are, the greater the range of your RF device. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 4:49*am, John Smith wrote:
Am 04.03.11 13:01, schrieb Nigel Cottrell: This looks a lot like the Trig 21 which I have had fitted in a powered plane for about 18 months and am very happy with. http://www.trig-avionics.com/library/TT2xBrochure.pdf The TT21 is a class 2 transponder and therefore *not* suited for gliders. If you choose to go with Trig, then do yourself a favour and buy the TT22. The TT21 is very suitable for gliders. Its being installed in many gliders in the USA and I expect elsewhere. The issue between class 1 and 2 transponders comes down to a fairly meaningless difference in output power when you compare 15,000' vs. the maximum altitude we typically fly at. If the difference in price between say a TT21 and TT22 puts anybody off who should otherwise be installing a transponder please install the TT21 Darryl |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darryl Ramm wrote:
The TT21 is a class 2 transponder and therefore *not* suited for gliders. If you choose to go with Trig, then do yourself a favour and buy the TT22. The TT21 is very suitable for gliders. Its being installed in many gliders in the USA and I expect elsewhere. The issue between class 1 and 2 transponders comes down to a fairly meaningless difference in output power when you compare 15,000' vs. the maximum altitude we typically fly at. If you ever want to climb above 15,000 ft in an airspace where a tansponder is mandatory (which I do regularly), then you are just plain illegal with the TT21. This may be "fairly meaningless" for you, it's not for me and should not be for any pilot. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 12:49 04 March 2011, John Smith wrote:
Am 04.03.11 13:01, schrieb Nigel Cottrell: This looks a lot like the Trig 21 which I have had fitted in a powered plane for about 18 months and am very happy with. http://www.trig-avionics.com/library/TT2xBrochure.pdf The TT21 is a class 2 transponder and therefore *not* suited for gliders. If you choose to go with Trig, then do yourself a favour and buy the TT22. If you want a Class 1 the best option currently available is probably the TT22. Here in the UK the possibility of flight above 10000' is very limited Wales, Scotland and a few areas in the North of England and so wouldn't be a consideration for the vast majority of owners. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors | John Murphy | Soaring | 16 | December 20th 08 07:25 AM |
helo 1182 small - 1182 small.JPG (1/1) | urbanwriter | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 15th 07 09:06 PM |
where to buy a small crank | Charles McLaurin | Soaring | 1 | May 12th 06 03:05 PM |
Small Typo | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | December 2nd 05 03:29 AM |
Why are there no small turboprops? | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Piloting | 59 | June 8th 04 02:57 PM |