![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 9:52*pm, (Alan) wrote:
In article Bruce Hoult writes: On Mar 5, 8:44=A0am, John Smith wrote: If you ever want to climb above 15,000 ft in an airspace where a tansponder is mandatory (which I do regularly), then you are just plain illegal with the TT21. This may be "fairly meaningless" for you, it's not for me and should not be for any pilot. Saying something is "illegal" is a fairly useless statement. A lot of things are illegal, ranging from driving at 60 in a 55 zone and on up. I think you need to explain: - what is the likely safety implication of flying above 15000 with a TT21? I suspect the answer is "none whatsoever". * Unless, of course, the encoder actually cannot encode significantly above that altitude. * Or, if it encodes incorrect values, resulting in that airliner hitting you and going down with all aboard. *That will look about as bad as not having had a transponder in the first place. - what is the penalty for being caught doing so? What is the chance of being caught? * The first part probably depends on how you are caught. * * * * Alan Nice fear theories but there is no reality here. The encoders in the Trig transponders are not an issue. The TT21 and TT22 use the same control head and that is where the encoder is. Current Mode C/gray code (100' resolution) external encoders operate to a minimum of 30k feet. More expensive expensive encoders get you to higher altitudes. And to get into a Mode S/serial encoder (25' resolution) style encoder typically gets you higher than 30k feet as standard but most of the Mode S transponders we care about in gliders come with built in encoders. For all USA gliders after transponder installation a static system check (Part 43 Appendix E) is required to ensure both altimeter and encoder accuracy. Nothing in that static systems tests is specific to type 1 or 2 transponders--just ask the person doing the test if they can check to 18,000' or higher just to be sure. (and if a Trig encoder needs adjusting to meet altimeter accuracy the test operator has to drive it up to 20,000' anyhow to use the calibration adjustment). What is important is to get people installing and properly using transponders where we have high density airline and fast jet traffic. Not only did Trig (and maybe some other products in Europe who are not available in the USA) significantly lower the cost and power requirements of installing Mode S but they also significantly reduced the cost difference between the Class 2 and Class 1 versions of their transponders. Other vendors had been using that class 1 vs class 2 requirement to create high artificial price differences between their transponders (for what were basically the same electronics). Trig's price difference seems only around $200, so pretty marginal, so there is less reason to use the Class 2 TT21 if class 1 requirement worries you. The TT22 will use slightly more power than the TT21. Almost all glider installations of Trig transponders I am aware of are TT21 and seem to be doing very well. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors | John Murphy | Soaring | 16 | December 20th 08 07:25 AM |
helo 1182 small - 1182 small.JPG (1/1) | urbanwriter | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 15th 07 09:06 PM |
where to buy a small crank | Charles McLaurin | Soaring | 1 | May 12th 06 03:05 PM |
Small Typo | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | December 2nd 05 03:29 AM |
Why are there no small turboprops? | Thomas J. Paladino Jr. | Piloting | 59 | June 8th 04 02:57 PM |