![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:10:20 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
If it weren't for "fancy software," nobody could have even operated "old" jamming tech. Pretty much everything since 1970 has relied on computing power to handle the actual work when it comes to ECM, and the operator does larger-scale management. The computing power on B-52H ECM up to the early 80's when I retired was still mostly the EWO. SAC wasn't exactly a leader in ECM technology.. Modern systems have to handle dozens of threats within a few seconds, and there's just no way in hell someone could do that manually. When it comes to ECM, it's computer versus computer. Hell, automatic chaff and flare dispensing has been available for a long time... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Buzzer wrote: On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:10:20 GMT, Chad Irby wrote: If it weren't for "fancy software," nobody could have even operated "old" jamming tech. Pretty much everything since 1970 has relied on computing power to handle the actual work when it comes to ECM, and the operator does larger-scale management. The computing power on B-52H ECM up to the early 80's when I retired was still mostly the EWO. SAC wasn't exactly a leader in ECM technology.. The B-52 ECM suite at that time was still basically 1950s tech. Hydraulically-tuned magnetrons and the like. -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 03:16:52 GMT, Chad Irby wrote:
In article , Buzzer wrote: On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:10:20 GMT, Chad Irby wrote: If it weren't for "fancy software," nobody could have even operated "old" jamming tech. Pretty much everything since 1970 has relied on computing power to handle the actual work when it comes to ECM, and the operator does larger-scale management. The computing power on B-52H ECM up to the early 80's when I retired was still mostly the EWO. SAC wasn't exactly a leader in ECM technology.. The B-52 ECM suite at that time was still basically 1950s tech. Hydraulically-tuned magnetrons and the like. No. The hydralic-tuned transmitters, ALT-6B/ALT-22, had been replaced completely by then. At least on our H models. The main high power stuff was the souped up 60's era voltage tuned BWO ALQ-155s, but they hadn't been hooked together yet for power management. Still turn the knob to change freqs. Some of the other newer stuff, TWTs mainly, was basically about as far as you could go digital, but still not really "computer" controlled.. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 04:13 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 03:31 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 08:29 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 04:04 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 3rd 04 12:41 AM |