![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/7/2011 2:47 PM, Mike the Strike wrote:
On Mar 7, 2:14 pm, Eric wrote: On 3/7/2011 7:24 AM, Mike the Strike wrote: We have discussed this many times before. The nose-up attitude of the glider results in extra forces that have to be overcome by the wings and tail surfaces. In particular, modern standard-class ships with a low angle of incidence of the wing have a pronounced nose-up attitude that results in loss of control at speeds well above free-flight stall speed. I'm having trouble picturing the influence of a low angle of incidence of the wing (I assume that's compared to the fuselage) on loss of control. Why would the wing be affected by the fuselage attitude being a few degrees higher, relative to the air, than on an older glider? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) The angle of incidence of the wing (relative to the fuselage) is a lot lower on modern standard class ships. The result is that they have a pronounced nose-up attitude when flying slowly - you can see this both on tow and when thermalling. On aero-tow, a nose-mounted tow hook will result in a downward force on the nose that has to be compensated by an upward force from the tailplane and extra lift from the wings. The point at which you lose control under these dynamics is at a lot higher speed than the free-flight stall speed. The effect doesn't seem to be as strong with older gliders or flapped ships, but definitely is a lot less in low tow. The incidence difference is less that 5 degrees, isn't it? That would mean the nose hook was only about 6" higher than otherwise. I just can't see how moving the rope up 6" is going to change the forces significantly. There is a bigger difference between a CG hook and nose hook vertical separation, and nobody comments on how they lose control sooner with the nose hook. I sure didn't notice any difference on my previous glider, an ASW 20 B, where I used neutral flap to tow. Maybe the difference between older and newer gliders is wing loading? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|