A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Aerobatics
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Q: Upset Training Course Vs Basic Aerobatics?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 30th 04, 02:58 PM
Tom Parsons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Jay-
Would there be advantages to enrolling in a purpose-built "Upset Recovery"
course instead of say, just popping over to the local FBO and scheduling a
hop in a Great Lakes or Decathlon to experience spins and spin recovery?


I have seen a noticeable difference between typical upset-recovery
courses and beginning aerobatic training.
The upset-recovery course should concentrate on specific scenarios that
could lead to unusual attitudes, such as a wake-turbulence encounter, a
skidding/tightening low-airspeed turn, loss of spatial orientation, etc.
It should provide exposure to unusual flight attitudes, opportunities
to experience the specific scenarios, and techniques for avoidance and
recovery. It should also include exposure to a good variety of spin
modes and techniques for spin recovery. It should talk about
transferring the skills you learn to the normal GA aircraft you fly most
of the time. You may never get to fly a loop in an upset-recovery course!
Basic aerobatics training, on the other hand, will be more aimed at
control of higher-performance aircraft used in aerobatic flying. It
should cover the basic aerobatic maneuvers, such as loops, rolls, spins,
hammerheads, and combinations of all those. It may also focus on
adjusting your system to the unusual sensations of higher-Gs and
sustained inverted flight, and helping you to build up your tolerance.
It should also cover techniques for recovering from typical botched
maneuvers, as well as a full series of upright and inverted spin recoveries.
Similarities between the two include the exposure to unusual attitides,
the knowledge gained on how to recover from unusual attitudes, and the
spin training. But there is enough different between the two types of
training to make your question worth thinking about. If you are really
after only a confidence-building and skill-building experience for your
future straight-and-level flying (or anre not sure if you want to get
into aerobatics), then I think the upset course is better. But if
you're sure you're really interested in getting into aerobatics, the
basic aerobatics course is better.
Either one will be a big ol' boatload if fun! And there are lots of
places close to you to go for this training. FCI has an operation right
there in Chandler if I'm not mistaken, Budd Davission at Scottsdale can
take you up in his Pitts, and Sonny Weller is just up the highway in
Derr Valley. Have fun!

Tom P.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 March 1st 04 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 February 1st 04 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 October 1st 03 07:27 AM
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 September 1st 03 07:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.