![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jay-
Would there be advantages to enrolling in a purpose-built "Upset Recovery" course instead of say, just popping over to the local FBO and scheduling a hop in a Great Lakes or Decathlon to experience spins and spin recovery? I have seen a noticeable difference between typical upset-recovery courses and beginning aerobatic training. The upset-recovery course should concentrate on specific scenarios that could lead to unusual attitudes, such as a wake-turbulence encounter, a skidding/tightening low-airspeed turn, loss of spatial orientation, etc. It should provide exposure to unusual flight attitudes, opportunities to experience the specific scenarios, and techniques for avoidance and recovery. It should also include exposure to a good variety of spin modes and techniques for spin recovery. It should talk about transferring the skills you learn to the normal GA aircraft you fly most of the time. You may never get to fly a loop in an upset-recovery course! Basic aerobatics training, on the other hand, will be more aimed at control of higher-performance aircraft used in aerobatic flying. It should cover the basic aerobatic maneuvers, such as loops, rolls, spins, hammerheads, and combinations of all those. It may also focus on adjusting your system to the unusual sensations of higher-Gs and sustained inverted flight, and helping you to build up your tolerance. It should also cover techniques for recovering from typical botched maneuvers, as well as a full series of upright and inverted spin recoveries. Similarities between the two include the exposure to unusual attitides, the knowledge gained on how to recover from unusual attitudes, and the spin training. But there is enough different between the two types of training to make your question worth thinking about. If you are really after only a confidence-building and skill-building experience for your future straight-and-level flying (or anre not sure if you want to get into aerobatics), then I think the upset course is better. But if you're sure you're really interested in getting into aerobatics, the basic aerobatics course is better. Either one will be a big ol' boatload if fun! And there are lots of places close to you to go for this training. FCI has an operation right there in Chandler if I'm not mistaken, Budd Davission at Scottsdale can take you up in his Pitts, and Sonny Weller is just up the highway in Derr Valley. Have fun! Tom P. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | February 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | September 1st 03 07:27 AM |