A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine Sizing and Selection



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 2nd 03, 01:28 PM
ChuckSlusarczyk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Barnyard BOb -- says...

Although my new moon really wasn't yesterday....
It's was close enough for the intended purpose.
Your response could begin to explain much, too. g

Barnyard BOb -- over 50 years of successful flight


Hey Unka Bob
We didn't have a new Moon this year in our parts I think it's the Solar storms
in my neighborhood. Gravity is less too since my plane flys better since it got
cold...

Chuck (I looked in the mirror and saw my moon was sagging)S

  #22  
Old November 2nd 03, 03:21 PM
David O
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Barnyard BOb -- wrote:

Although my new moon really wasn't yesterday....
It's was close enough for the intended purpose.
Your response could begin to explain much, too. g


I have been told that I defy explanation. As for the moon, however,
on my planet, Earth, the moon was closer to full than new yesterday.
A full moon and a total lunar eclipse will occur this coming weekend.
I expect that some barnyard animals might become especially agitated
during this period.

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/LunarEclipse.html

David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com


  #23  
Old November 2nd 03, 03:37 PM
Barnyard BOb --
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Barnyard BOb -- wrote:

Although my new moon really wasn't yesterday....
It's was close enough for the intended purpose.
Your response could begin to explain much, too. g


I have been told that I defy explanation. As for the moon, however,
on my planet, Earth, the moon was closer to full than new yesterday.
A full moon and a total lunar eclipse will occur this coming weekend.
I expect that some barnyard animals might become especially agitated
during this period.

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/LunarEclipse.html

David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Didn't know about the upcoming eclipse.

As usual, you are unpredictable
while always informative. {8-D

Agitatingly yours,
Barnyard BOb ---
  #24  
Old November 3rd 03, 06:31 AM
Rob Turk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Toks Desalu" wrote in message
news:mnGob.73419$HS4.639796@attbi_s01...
Nah-
I am in good ol' America!

Toks


If you don't mind using engines from good ol' down under, then Jabiru is an
excellent choise. 120HP at 83Kg (~170lbs), well constructed and well
supported by two very active dealers in the US. Check out the Jabiru engines
forum on http://groups.yahoo.com to learn more about real-life experiences
with these.

Rob


  #25  
Old November 3rd 03, 06:48 AM
Jay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dillon Pyron wrote in message
A twin powered by two unreliable engines is just an underpowered
single waiting to happen.


And when that happens, you land and get it fixed. But in the mean
time you have an aircraft well powered by a pair of engines with power
to weight ratios difficult to match at a cost within the reach of the
working man, with a composite reliability that exceeds a single 4
stroke.

It's true that the lone 2 stroke engine is typically paired with
aircraft that land off field as matter of course (golf) or can put
down pretty much anywhere when there is a failure (powered parachute).
But there are applications where weight is of paramount importance
(Hey, isn't that every airplane?) like ultralights. So thats the idea
of the dual system. and of course less engine weight means, less
airframe structure required to support it, less power required to
lift, and less wing to support all that, and less fuel to push all
that, etc...

BTW, Isn't that RV-4 with the 13B in it sweet looking?
http://powersportaviation.com/images.../Airplane2.jpg
Getting rid of those cheeks really cleans things up. The RV-6 doesn't
seem like such a great fit since Vans already made the frontal area
large in anticipation of the opposed cylinder engine.
  #27  
Old November 4th 03, 02:22 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dillon

The J-79 in the F-104 was great when it ran and a piece of crap when
it didn't which it didn't on numerous occasions.

They put a pair of them in the F-4 and every one knows how that bird
performed.

Big John

On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 05:02:24 GMT, Dillon Pyron
wrote:

----dlip----


There are very high output 2 stroke motors available around 1hp/lb.
Mainly adapted from snow mobile (Rotax) applications. Used as a
single, the realibility is below what most people desire, but as a
pair, its down right usuable.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

BOb

----clip----

A twin powered by two unreliable engines is just an underpowered
single waiting to happen.

  #28  
Old November 6th 03, 05:24 PM
Jay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Big John wrote in message . ..
Dillon

The J-79 in the F-104 was great when it ran and a piece of crap when
it didn't which it didn't on numerous occasions.


Sounds like a 2 stroke, high power/weight... when it works.

They put a pair of them in the F-4 and every one knows how that bird
performed.

Big John


So would this be an example of the when the whole is greater than the
sum of its parts? You might say even the whole is the product (of the
reliabilities) of the parts.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.