![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Barnyard BOb -- says...
Although my new moon really wasn't yesterday.... It's was close enough for the intended purpose. Your response could begin to explain much, too. g Barnyard BOb -- over 50 years of successful flight Hey Unka Bob We didn't have a new Moon this year in our parts I think it's the Solar storms in my neighborhood. Gravity is less too since my plane flys better since it got cold... Chuck (I looked in the mirror and saw my moon was sagging)S |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Barnyard BOb -- wrote: Although my new moon really wasn't yesterday.... It's was close enough for the intended purpose. Your response could begin to explain much, too. g I have been told that I defy explanation. As for the moon, however, on my planet, Earth, the moon was closer to full than new yesterday. A full moon and a total lunar eclipse will occur this coming weekend. I expect that some barnyard animals might become especially agitated during this period. ![]() http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/LunarEclipse.html David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Barnyard BOb -- wrote: Although my new moon really wasn't yesterday.... It's was close enough for the intended purpose. Your response could begin to explain much, too. g I have been told that I defy explanation. As for the moon, however, on my planet, Earth, the moon was closer to full than new yesterday. A full moon and a total lunar eclipse will occur this coming weekend. I expect that some barnyard animals might become especially agitated during this period. ![]() http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/LunarEclipse.html David O -- http://www.AirplaneZone.com +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Didn't know about the upcoming eclipse. As usual, you are unpredictable while always informative. {8-D Agitatingly yours, Barnyard BOb --- |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Toks Desalu" wrote in message
news:mnGob.73419$HS4.639796@attbi_s01... Nah- I am in good ol' America! Toks If you don't mind using engines from good ol' down under, then Jabiru is an excellent choise. 120HP at 83Kg (~170lbs), well constructed and well supported by two very active dealers in the US. Check out the Jabiru engines forum on http://groups.yahoo.com to learn more about real-life experiences with these. Rob |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dillon Pyron wrote in message
A twin powered by two unreliable engines is just an underpowered single waiting to happen. And when that happens, you land and get it fixed. But in the mean time you have an aircraft well powered by a pair of engines with power to weight ratios difficult to match at a cost within the reach of the working man, with a composite reliability that exceeds a single 4 stroke. It's true that the lone 2 stroke engine is typically paired with aircraft that land off field as matter of course (golf) or can put down pretty much anywhere when there is a failure (powered parachute). But there are applications where weight is of paramount importance (Hey, isn't that every airplane?) like ultralights. So thats the idea of the dual system. and of course less engine weight means, less airframe structure required to support it, less power required to lift, and less wing to support all that, and less fuel to push all that, etc... BTW, Isn't that RV-4 with the 13B in it sweet looking? http://powersportaviation.com/images.../Airplane2.jpg Getting rid of those cheeks really cleans things up. The RV-6 doesn't seem like such a great fit since Vans already made the frontal area large in anticipation of the opposed cylinder engine. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dillon
The J-79 in the F-104 was great when it ran and a piece of crap when it didn't which it didn't on numerous occasions. They put a pair of them in the F-4 and every one knows how that bird performed. Big John On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 05:02:24 GMT, Dillon Pyron wrote: ----dlip---- There are very high output 2 stroke motors available around 1hp/lb. Mainly adapted from snow mobile (Rotax) applications. Used as a single, the realibility is below what most people desire, but as a pair, its down right usuable. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ BOb ----clip---- A twin powered by two unreliable engines is just an underpowered single waiting to happen. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John wrote in message . ..
Dillon The J-79 in the F-104 was great when it ran and a piece of crap when it didn't which it didn't on numerous occasions. Sounds like a 2 stroke, high power/weight... when it works. They put a pair of them in the F-4 and every one knows how that bird performed. Big John So would this be an example of the when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts? You might say even the whole is the product (of the reliabilities) of the parts. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|