![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:20:29 -0500, "Lawrence Dillard"
wrote: Agreed, to a certain extent; I could have expressed myself somewhat more clearly. GWB was *assigned* to ARF/ARPC in Oct. of 1972. ARF is the location where Guard Members' *records* are sent for among other things, disciplinary reasons. (My mistake, I was typing too quickly. I certainly don't run an anti-GWB website, and had no intent to astonish anyone.) To reiterate, "discipline" need not necessarily mean either brig time nor any type of *physical restraint*. Apparently, there are some on this NG who do understand that, for example,*probation* is a form of discipline (custody) which does not involve restraint or incarceration. A JAG or Army equivalent could explain. I can't find anything official that being assigned to ARPC is some type of mark against a persons record. Could you provide some official source for that thought? I did find this at the ARPC site, but nothing about it being some type of punishment.. Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) "The Personnel Center’s mission expanded in the 1970s, when the Air Force made ARPC responsible for all Air National Guard personnel records. This action happened first for officers in July 1971, and then for enlisted members in March 1978." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|