![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 11, 2:22*pm, "John Godfrey (QT)"
wrote: A new document entitled "Critical Contest Safety Procedures Checklist" has been posted on the SSA rules page. We hope contest organizers and participants find this a helpful guide to key safety considerations. Thanks to BB for his efforts. http://www.ssa.org/files/member/Cont...0Checklist.pdf For the Committee, John Godfrey (QT) SSA Rules Committee Thank you |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A new document entitled "Critical Contest Safety Procedures Checklist" has been posted on the SSA rules page. We hope contest organizers and participants find this a helpful guide to key safety considerations. Thanks to BB for his efforts. http://www.ssa.org/files/member/Cont...0Checklist.pdf For the Committee, John Godfrey (QT) SSA Rules Committee Thank you John and John....both of you are the BEST! I will certainly introduce and give my pilots this new checklist this summer. I can't thank you two for all you do. The sport is so much safer because of work like this. thank you. Charlie"Lite" and Micki |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 8:06*pm, MickiMinner wrote:
A new document entitled "Critical Contest Safety Procedures Checklist" has been posted on the SSA rules page. We hope contest organizers and participants find this a helpful guide to key safety considerations. Thanks to BB for his efforts. http://www.ssa.org/files/member/Cont...0Checklist.pdf For the Committee, John Godfrey (QT) SSA Rules Committee Thank you John and John....both of you are the BEST! *I will certainly introduce and give my pilots this new checklist this summer. *I can't thank you two for all you do. *The sport is so much safer because of work like this. *thank you. Charlie"Lite" and Micki How could a tow plane pass the glider it just released unless the glider was in the lead at release? And wouldn't that be scary? I have towed literally hundreds of pattern tows in the past year and, except for rare circumstances, I fly a tighter pattern than the glider. The glider usually releases at mid-field downwind and turns slightly away to the right to achieve his desired ground track. I continue to accelerate to pattern speed, begin my 180 degree descending base turn when abeam the numbers (or sooner or later depending on winds), land long, clear the runway, execute a 180, stop, and watch the glider on short final some 1,500 feet away. I see no reason to delay the next takeoff waiting for the glider to complete a pattern and land before I do. Of course I wait for the landing glider to stop before taxiing forward to hook up the next glider. If there is another aircraft in the pattern necessitating me to extend my pattern, I'll break out and allow the glider I just released to land first. It's all about planning and judgment... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great document. Thanks.
Concerning "Spratt guidelines of 2500’ AGL to launch, 3300’ AGL to start, should be followed unless there is a good reason." This is ambiguous as to what is being referenced for the AGL height. Cloudbase? Critical updraft height? BL height? Sniffer max height? Beer fumes from the bacchanalia the night before? ;-) Thanks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 9:58*am, ContestID67 wrote:
Great document. *Thanks. Concerning "Spratt guidelines of 2500’ AGL to launch, 3300’ AGL to start, should be followed unless there is a good reason." This is ambiguous as to what is being referenced for the AGL height. Cloudbase? *Critical updraft height? *BL height? *Sniffer max height? Beer fumes from the bacchanalia the night before? *;-) Thanks. I'm pretty sure this is top of the lift actually achieved by gliders in the air. 3300 ft AGL is probably workable for many eastern sites and possibly Hobbs but I would hesitate to start a task in Arizona this low. Contestants are likely to be soon on the ground at local strips or eating cactus! I personally would recommend a minimum of 5,000 ft AGL here. Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 2:56*pm, Mike the Strike wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:58*am, ContestID67 wrote: Great document. *Thanks. Concerning "Spratt guidelines of 2500’ AGL to launch, 3300’ AGL to start, should be followed unless there is a good reason." This is ambiguous as to what is being referenced for the AGL height. Cloudbase? *Critical updraft height? *BL height? *Sniffer max height? Beer fumes from the bacchanalia the night before? *;-) Thanks. I'm pretty sure this is top of the lift actually achieved by gliders in the air. 3300 ft AGL is probably workable for many eastern sites and possibly Hobbs but I would hesitate to start a task in Arizona this low. *Contestants are likely to be soon on the ground at local strips or eating cactus! *I personally would recommend a minimum of 5,000 ft AGL here. Mike Spratt 2500 to launch is derived from a "standard" 2000 ft AGL tow and, of course, we don't fly closer than 500 vertically from clouds. 3300 AGL is min recommended to open task. That does not say CD and advisors must open at that. Local situations may dictate higher. Example in the East- at new Castle 3300 above airport is only 800 or so above some important local terrain. as result, the "go" there is set higher. I hope this clarifies a bit. UH |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm pretty sure this is top of the lift actually achieved by gliders in the air. 3300 ft AGL is probably workable for many eastern sites and possibly Hobbs but I would hesitate to start a task in Arizona this low. *Contestants are likely to be soon on the ground at local strips or eating cactus! *I personally would recommend a minimum of 5,000 ft AGL here. Mike just because the task is open doesn't mean you have to start, right? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 5:30*pm, Tony wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is top of the lift actually achieved by gliders in the air. 3300 ft AGL is probably workable for many eastern sites and possibly Hobbs but I would hesitate to start a task in Arizona this low. *Contestants are likely to be soon on the ground at local strips or eating cactus! *I personally would recommend a minimum of 5,000 ft AGL here. Mike just because the task is open doesn't mean you have to start, right? Right; check your rules. The gate doesn't actually close until local sunset. -- Matt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 13, 9:58*am, ContestID67 wrote:
Great document. *Thanks. Concerning "Spratt guidelines of 2500’ AGL to launch, 3300’ AGL to start, should be followed unless there is a good reason." This is ambiguous as to what is being referenced for the AGL height. Cloudbase? *Critical updraft height? *BL height? *Sniffer max height? Beer fumes from the bacchanalia the night before? *;-) Thanks. I think the amswers are - launch if sniffer reports reaching 2,500agl and Task open if task adviser in that class reports reaching 3,300 agl. The CD may, or may not, ask other pilots what height they have achieved before opening the task. Who is asked may depend on who was nice to the CD the evening before. Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA / The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Safety Seminars 2008 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | November 8th 07 11:15 PM |
A Critical Evaluation of the F22 | john smith[_2_] | Piloting | 10 | May 27th 07 06:02 AM |
FOR ALL SAFETY AND HUMAN LIFE CRITICAL FUNCTIONS IN THE,UNITED STATESGOVERNMENT | BiffClinton | Piloting | 2 | May 4th 07 01:41 AM |
The Soaring Safety Foundation (SSF) Safety Seminars Hit The Road in the USA | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 11th 06 03:48 AM |
Contest Safety | birddog bob | Soaring | 32 | August 15th 05 01:00 AM |