![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The US postwar history:
Korea: stalemate Cuban Missile Crisis: stalemate Vietnam: LOST Operation Eagle Claw (Iranian Hostage Rescue): Failure Lebanon: Marines blown up- failure Reagan-Bush years: a string of success shooting down a few Libyan MiGs and attacking small puny nations with no AF- Victory? Gulf War I: had to raise a coalition to fight another Third World nation, didn't finish the job which leads to Gulf War II. Kurds and population suffer as a result. The Balkans: another attack on an unworthy adversary. Serbs leave with their armor and military/police units intact. International force needed. Terrorist attack on the USS Cole: failed 9/11: could prevent terrorist attack, 3000 fatalities Afghanistan: attack on another unworthy adversary. Taliban and Osama escape into Pakistan. International force needed again. Failure. Iraq prewar: Fires at US aircraft for 7 years, US retaliates in 1998, Iraq resumes firing at US aircraft for 4 more years Gulf War II: US goes it alone, captures Saddam but cannot get real reconstruction support or troops needed to finish the job due to isolating UN and certain European nations- failure Wow, how underwhelming it all is. We seem to be able to pound into submission any puny Third World nation without a significant AF. But we don't dare strike Iran, N Korea, or China. In fact China openly threatens the US over Taiwan and is militarily developing systems to defeat our stealth, satellites, and to attack the US with missiles in the future. Iran has threatened the US over its nuclear reactor and N Korea has done the same over its nuclear program which we failed to stop. BTW, try attacking the FSU even at its weakest... they have twice the nukes we have and we all know the history of those that invade Mother Russia. On their turf the US would lose, same in China. So I don't care how many time you say Germany lost. Germany is the size of 1 US state and took on the world. It took everyone with everything to beat them. The US in Vietnam was a Superpower giant with the greatest technology on earth... and lost to peasants walking through the jungle at night in pajamas armed with an AK-47, machetes, mines, grenades and RPGs. The US may be the lone Superpower on paper but our track record post-WW2 isn't that great. Rob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nazi German post war history:
crickets |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Krztalizer wrote: Nazi German post war history: crickets Add: Occasional war criminals dancing the hemp fandango to general approval. -- Andy Breen ~ Interplanetary Scintillation Research Group http://users.aber.ac.uk/azb/ "Time has stopped, says the Black Lion clock and eternity has begun" (Dylan Thomas) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robert arndt" wrote in message m... The US postwar history: Facts arent your strong point are they ? Korea: stalemate South Korea was saved from the invading forces of the DPRK and now a prosperous democracy and ally. Meanwhile the DPRK moulders in a prison of its own making. Cuban Missile Crisis: stalemate Nope, the Soviet missiles were withdrawn as the US demanded. Vietnam: LOST Operation Eagle Claw (Iranian Hostage Rescue): Failure Lebanon: Marines blown up- failure True enough Reagan-Bush years: a string of success shooting down a few Libyan MiGs and attacking small puny nations with no AF- Victory? Then there's the little matter of the fall of communism, the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the collapse of the USSR Gulf War I: had to raise a coalition to fight another Third World nation, didn't finish the job which leads to Gulf War II. Kurds and population suffer as a result. The war aims of expelling Iraq from Kuwait were achieved The Balkans: another attack on an unworthy adversary. Serbs leave with their armor and military/police units intact. International force needed. The war aims of protecting the Kosovans from Serbian ethnic cleansing were achieved Terrorist attack on the USS Cole: failed Quite so, the ship was repaired and re-entered service 9/11: could prevent terrorist attack, 3000 fatalities Afghanistan: attack on another unworthy adversary. Taliban and Osama escape into Pakistan. International force needed again. Failure. Success , Afghanistan is no longer a safe haven for terrorist groups Iraq prewar: Fires at US aircraft for 7 years, US retaliates in 1998, Iraq resumes firing at US aircraft for 4 more years Gulf War II: US goes it alone, captures Saddam but cannot get real reconstruction support or troops needed to finish the job due to isolating UN and certain European nations- failure The British troops who took Southern Iraq and Basra tend to disagree about the going it alone bit. Wow, how underwhelming it all is. We seem to be able to pound into submission any puny Third World nation without a significant AF. Iraq started GW1 with the 4th largest army in the world and a large AF and air defence system, of course when it was over .... But we don't dare strike Iran, N Korea, or China. In fact China openly threatens the US over Taiwan and is militarily developing systems to defeat our stealth, satellites, and to attack the US with missiles in the future. Iran has threatened the US over its nuclear reactor and N Korea has done the same over its nuclear program which we failed to stop. BTW, try attacking the FSU even at its weakest... they have twice the nukes we have and we all know the history of those that invade Mother Russia. On their turf the US would lose, same in China. The difference of course is the US knows that, your hero Adolf didnt. So I don't care how many time you say Germany lost. Germany is the size of 1 US state and took on the world. It took everyone with everything to beat them. Germany had a larger population than any 10 states combined and controlled the combined industries of western europe and couldnt even beat Britain. Keith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Nope, the Soviet missiles were withdrawn as the US demanded. I don't wish to appear to join the loony "good old days of the Reich" side of this discussion, but the Cuban missile crisis was such a clear-cut US victory, since Kennedy negotiated the removal of the Russian missiles by offering to remove his own from Turkey. Si |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Simon Robbins" wrote in message ... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Nope, the Soviet missiles were withdrawn as the US demanded. I don't wish to appear to join the loony "good old days of the Reich" side of this discussion, but the Cuban missile crisis was such a clear-cut US victory, since Kennedy negotiated the removal of the Russian missiles by offering to remove his own from Turkey. Sure but they were early liquid fueled IRBM's (Jupiter IRC) that were removed from service worldwide by 1963 in any event. Keith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Simon Robbins" writes: "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... Nope, the Soviet missiles were withdrawn as the US demanded. I don't wish to appear to join the loony "good old days of the Reich" side of this discussion, but the Cuban missile crisis was such a clear-cut US victory, since Kennedy negotiated the removal of the Russian missiles by offering to remove his own from Turkey. That seems to be the latest buzz, but its interesting to note that the Jupiters in Turkey had been slated in 1961 to be retired in 1963-64, a year before the missile Crisis. Quite frankly, the Jupiters weren't good for much, anyway. (Despite being designed by Wehrner von Braun's team at Redstone Arsenal). The supposed mobility was worthless, they couldn't be based in a hardened structure like a coffin or silo, and their reaction time (fuelling & arming) was so long that they were vulnerable to airplanes from Bulgaria. Check out "The Other Missiles of October" if you get the chance. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" wrote in message m... The US postwar history: Facts arent your strong point are they ? Korea: stalemate South Korea was saved from the invading forces of the DPRK and now a prosperous democracy and ally. Meanwhile the DPRK moulders in a prison of its own making. Cuban Missile Crisis: stalemate Nope, the Soviet missiles were withdrawn as the US demanded. And the Jupiters from Turkey as Russia demanded, along with assurances that US would not invade Cuba. Stalemate. Vietnam: LOST Operation Eagle Claw (Iranian Hostage Rescue): Failure Lebanon: Marines blown up- failure True enough Reagan-Bush years: a string of success shooting down a few Libyan MiGs and attacking small puny nations with no AF- Victory? Then there's the little matter of the fall of communism, the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the collapse of the USSR Gulf War I: had to raise a coalition to fight another Third World nation, didn't finish the job which leads to Gulf War II. Kurds and population suffer as a result. The war aims of expelling Iraq from Kuwait were achieved The Balkans: another attack on an unworthy adversary. Serbs leave with their armor and military/police units intact. International force needed. The war aims of protecting the Kosovans from Serbian ethnic cleansing were achieved Terrorist attack on the USS Cole: failed Quite so, the ship was repaired and re-entered service It was a very sucessful attack. 56 casualties, a cool quarter billion in repairs, ship out of the service for more than an year. 9/11: could prevent terrorist attack, 3000 fatalities Afghanistan: attack on another unworthy adversary. Taliban and Osama escape into Pakistan. International force needed again. Failure. Success , Afghanistan is no longer a safe haven for terrorist groups Terrorists out, drug lords in. And I suppose all those reports of Taliban resurgence in the Pashtun areas are all propaganda. Iraq prewar: Fires at US aircraft for 7 years, US retaliates in 1998, Iraq resumes firing at US aircraft for 4 more years Gulf War II: US goes it alone, captures Saddam but cannot get real reconstruction support or troops needed to finish the job due to isolating UN and certain European nations- failure The British troops who took Southern Iraq and Basra tend to disagree about the going it alone bit. Wow, how underwhelming it all is. We seem to be able to pound into submission any puny Third World nation without a significant AF. Iraq started GW1 with the 4th largest army in the world and a large AF and air defence system, of course when it was over .... But we don't dare strike Iran, N Korea, or China. In fact China openly threatens the US over Taiwan and is militarily developing systems to defeat our stealth, satellites, and to attack the US with missiles in the future. Iran has threatened the US over its nuclear reactor and N Korea has done the same over its nuclear program which we failed to stop. BTW, try attacking the FSU even at its weakest... they have twice the nukes we have and we all know the history of those that invade Mother Russia. On their turf the US would lose, same in China. The difference of course is the US knows that, your hero Adolf didnt. So I don't care how many time you say Germany lost. Germany is the size of 1 US state and took on the world. It took everyone with everything to beat them. Germany had a larger population than any 10 states combined LOL! Tell us more. and controlled the combined industries of western europe and couldnt even beat Britain. Before the War Germany was a major (but not predominant) power in Europe. Today it still is a major (but not predominant) power in Europe. Before the war Britain was a major world power with a globe spanning empire - today it is a mere lackey to the US. Germany might not have won, but Britain sure seems to have lost. Keith |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tuollaf43" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message m... The US postwar history: Facts arent your strong point are they ? Korea: stalemate South Korea was saved from the invading forces of the DPRK and now a prosperous democracy and ally. Meanwhile the DPRK moulders in a prison of its own making. Cuban Missile Crisis: stalemate Nope, the Soviet missiles were withdrawn as the US demanded. And the Jupiters from Turkey as Russia demanded, along with assurances that US would not invade Cuba. Stalemate. Older missiles already planned for removal--we had a new program coming online about that time which you may have heard of...Polaris? We also removed the Thors from the UK at about the same time, and for the same reasons--they were liquid fueled and had been made superfluous. snip Afghanistan: attack on another unworthy adversary. Taliban and Osama escape into Pakistan. International force needed again. Failure. Success , Afghanistan is no longer a safe haven for terrorist groups Terrorists out, drug lords in. And I suppose all those reports of Taliban resurgence in the Pashtun areas are all propaganda. Uhmmm... the key at this point is,as Keith pointed out, it is no longer serving as an open bazaar and training ground for terrorists--and that a few other nations took note and became a bit less receptive of other terrorist operations. snip Germany had a larger population than any 10 states combined LOL! Tell us more. Uhmmm...the total population of Germany in 1940 was some 80 million, the US population was about 130 million, with the top four states (NY, PA, TX, CA) only accounting for some 34 million--so you can run the numbers further if you like, but it appears Keith's statement is in fact correct. www.ciaonet.org/book/schweller/appendix.html and controlled the combined industries of western europe and couldnt even beat Britain. Before the War Germany was a major (but not predominant) power in Europe. Today it still is a major (but not predominant) power in Europe. Thank goodness for the Marshall Plan, huh? Before the war Britain was a major world power with a globe spanning empire - today it is a mere lackey to the US. That's not correct. The UK remains an independent nation; that it has happened to agree with the US in more cases than it disagrees is as much a product of common values than anything else. Reading anything further into it merely indicates a degree of paranoia on your part. Germany might not have won, No, there is no doubt--she did not win. Thank goodness for that, huh? but Britain sure seems to have lost. Lost what? Are you sure you are not confusing the UK with *France*? Now France *did* lose, just like Germany eventually lost...sorry if that all upsets you, but them's the facts. Brooks Keith |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ...
"Tuollaf43" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "robert arndt" wrote in message m... The US postwar history: Facts arent your strong point are they ? Korea: stalemate South Korea was saved from the invading forces of the DPRK and now a prosperous democracy and ally. Meanwhile the DPRK moulders in a prison of its own making. Cuban Missile Crisis: stalemate Nope, the Soviet missiles were withdrawn as the US demanded. And the Jupiters from Turkey as Russia demanded, along with assurances that US would not invade Cuba. Stalemate. Older missiles already planned for removal--we had a new program coming online about that time which you may have heard of...Polaris? We also removed the Thors from the UK at about the same time, and for the same reasons--they were liquid fueled and had been made superfluous. Are you disputing the fact that missiles in turkey were removed on the insistence of the soviets? Then you are utterly wrong. The fact that the removed system was obsolete and due for removal anyway is immaterial. All you can claim is that the soviets could have bartered de-nuclearization of Cuba for some more useful concession - not that there was no concession. snip Afghanistan: attack on another unworthy adversary. Taliban and Osama escape into Pakistan. International force needed again. Failure. Success , Afghanistan is no longer a safe haven for terrorist groups Terrorists out, drug lords in. And I suppose all those reports of Taliban resurgence in the Pashtun areas are all propaganda. Uhmmm... the key at this point is,as Keith pointed out, it is no longer serving as an open bazaar and training ground for terrorists-- If Taliban comes, can Osama be far behind? and that a few other nations took note and became a bit less receptive of other terrorist operations. This is undoubtedly true. And certainly a good achievement. snip Germany had a larger population than any 10 states combined LOL! Tell us more. Uhmmm...the total population of Germany in 1940 was some 80 million, the US population was about 130 million, with the top four states (NY, PA, TX, CA) only accounting for some 34 million--so you can run the numbers further if you like, but it appears Keith's statement is in fact correct. www.ciaonet.org/book/schweller/appendix.html and controlled the combined industries of western europe and couldnt even beat Britain. Before the War Germany was a major (but not predominant) power in Europe. Today it still is a major (but not predominant) power in Europe. Thank goodness for the Marshall Plan, huh? Before the war Britain was a major world power with a globe spanning empire - today it is a mere lackey to the US. That's not correct. The UK remains an independent nation; There are degrees of independence. And I never said UK is not independence, merely a US lackey. that it has happened to agree with the US in more cases than it disagrees is as much a product of common values than anything else. ummm. I dare say you could be right. Both seem to value oil over life, propaganda over facts. Reading anything further into it merely indicates a degree of paranoia on your part. Perhaps reading anything less indicateds a degree of myopia on your part? And why in the world would anyone be afraid of the UK? Fear of US is understandable - its rich, powerful and governed by a mad hatter. But why would US+UK be particularly more frightful. It is like arguing that you are afraid of the gorilla because a chipmunk is backing it up. Germany might not have won, No, there is no doubt--she did not win. Thank goodness for that, huh? You feel very grateful, perhaps with cause. I dont have any particular reason to feel happy or unhappy about the German loss. To me it is a story of distant land in a distant time. Personally it is as emotionally immediate to me as Napoleans loss in Russia or Roman razing of Carthage; I dont grit my teeth at massacres of the assyrians, the golden horde, nazis or the bomber command. It is just sad but engrossing history to me. I have seen sufficient bad stuff in my own life time - I dont need to weep for generations long past. Learning from them is enough. Despite the untold tragedy and suffering the second world war wrought, there is atleast one shining bright point about that whole tragic affair. Thanks in large measure to Hitler and Roosevelt, the British Empire is now history. BTW I wonder when colonialism will be history. but Britain sure seems to have lost. Lost what? Are you sure you are not confusing the UK with *France*? I am talking about the fortunes of nations on a larger scale, not battles and wars. Think big (if at all possible). France was crushed in the first world war. It is yet to recover from that beating. UK was smashed in the second world war, not as badly as france, but smashed non the less. Now France *did* lose, just like Germany eventually lost... Indeed Germany lost. But it seemed to have bounced back pretty much to the same stature it had before the war. Cant say the same for France or UK can you? sorry if that all upsets you, but them's the facts. So nice of you to be concerned about my happiness Grofaz. Thanks. Brooks Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey, Germany Invented It... Face It | Erich Adler | Military Aviation | 51 | February 20th 04 05:39 PM |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
China in space. | Harley W. Daugherty | Military Aviation | 74 | November 1st 03 06:26 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
Chirac lost | JD | Military Aviation | 7 | July 26th 03 06:38 PM |