Logan Contest Reporting

On Jul 27, 5:32*am, Gary wrote:

So Ron, the section of Frank's report that the management found
objectionable has been pointed out....... but why it was thought to be
unacceptable has not been clearly defined or explained. That would
help us better understand the reason and possibly (or not) agree with
the decision. Personally, I think Frank breathes a lot of fresh air
into contest reports without resorting to "How many words can I write"
tactics.

Gary Adams GA2

Gary - I believe it was explained in this message (in another RAS
thread):
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9bbe41bddb6601

Enjoy,

--Noel

On Jul 27, 11:02*am, "noel.wade" wrote:
On Jul 27, 5:32*am, Gary wrote:

So Ron, the section of Frank's report that the management found
objectionable has been pointed out....... but why it was thought to be
unacceptable has not been clearly defined or explained. That would
help us better understand the reason and possibly (or not) agree with
the decision. Personally, I think Frank breathes a lot of fresh air
into contest reports without resorting to "How many words can I write"
tactics.

Gary Adams GA2

Gary - I believe it was explained in this message (in another RAS
thread):http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9bbe41bddb6601

Enjoy,

--Noel

Thanks,
GA2

Horse****.....and to add insult to the whole mess is we have to read,
correction, see the dry chicken maker boring crap on 'SoaringCafe'
after he chase TA away. If RG and TT had a problem with the accuracy
of TA reports and where his take on the flight was, than TA should
have been given the opportunity to reflect this with an updated report
to allow us to follow on with an exciting contest.
These two ruin a fun thing.
I apologize in advance if working with TA was tried and he refused.
R