![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chad Irby wrote:
snip You're forgetting something. Power. So what is the power of the satellites at what distance. Square dist law. Not to mention, of course, that you're transmitting that 1 watt omnidirectionally, Last (only) time I have tried for an isotropic ( within ~ 3 dB, which is what you need for GPS jamming from balloons, not omnidirectional) antenna with 125 mW input we got ~ 120 dBm at 30 clicks which in flat terrain, enough to get a reliable signal with an 11 dB omnidirctional recieve antenna. Now what is the level from the satellites? Suddenly, the "$5 balloon-borne jammer" is a "$500 balloon-borne jammer that only lasts a few hours." How long does an RPG blast go for and how much does it cost -- regards jc LEGAL - I don't believe what I wrote and neither should you. Sobriety and/or sanity of the author is not guaranteed EMAIL - and are not valid email addresses. news2x at perentie is valid for a while. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
jc wrote: Chad Irby wrote: snip You're forgetting something. Power. So what is the power of the satellites at what distance. Square dist law. You're leaving out off-axis rejection and a lot of other factors (vertically-oriented receive antennas, for one). Then there's the whole problem that the US military has been working on anti-jam GPS tech since *before* they launched the first satellite... Not to mention, of course, that you're transmitting that 1 watt omnidirectionally, Last (only) time I have tried for an isotropic ( within ~ 3 dB, which is what you need for GPS jamming from balloons, not omnidirectional) antenna with 125 mW input we got ~ 120 dBm at 30 clicks which in flat terrain, enough to get a reliable signal with an 11 dB omnidirctional recieve antenna. Now what is the level from the satellites? What was the bandwidth of that signal? Remember that you have to cover a good swath of frequency (two freqs, actually). A continuous-wave 1/8 watt sine over a narrow band is not useful for jamming a GPS signal, which is coming in over a much wider bandwidth (you're going to need white noise over a couple of octaves, at *least*, before getting useful power). Also remember that you have to cover enough of the sky to swamp *all* of the angles that a GPS receiver can cover, since it's going to reject anything except a "GPS-like" signal (part of the coolness of the GPS system). The normal "low" receive level is a few dB below your claimed level - no more than ten or sixteen. And that's worst-case in open ground. A vertically-hung omni antenna is a good approximation of an isotropic antenna in this case, since it's most probably going to be somewhat offset from the balloon to whatever you're trying to protect. You're also going to need to keep launching jammers all of the time, since you're going to need a lot of them, high enough up in the air to hit the upward-pointing receive antennas on GPS-guided weapons (or with *much* higher transmit power, by a factor of a hundred or so), all of the time. Suddenly, the "$5 balloon-borne jammer" is a "$500 balloon-borne jammer that only lasts a few hours." How long does an RPG blast go for and how much does it cost A lot more than one of those $5 jammers, but it does a *bunch* more damage. One RPG can kill a million dollar tank and all of its crew, while a couple of dozen GPS jammers will, if you're lucky, make someone wait until you get tired of using them before they drop those $30,000 bombs (or fall back on more-expensive TV-guided bombs). It's also a lot easier to sell than those "well, you have to buy a lot of them and keep launching them all of the time, *forever*" jammers... to give you an idea, to cover someplace like Iraq, you're going to need to launch a few *thousand* of those gadgets all at once, and be prepared to launch that same number every couple of hours (a day at most, since launching them high enough to cover the wide areas you want will subject them to high-speed winds that will push them all over the place). Once again, you're up against battery life, along with a *lot* higher actual power level than you seem to be allowing for. The Russian-made jammers we found in Iraq had an output power of four watts, but needed 25 watts of power to run. They also, by the way, didn't work worth a damn versus US GPS weapons... -- cirby at cfl.rr.com Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations. Slam on brakes accordingly. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is standard EMC equipment (pods/ground) applicable for GPS jamming ?
How unique are the GPS signals in comparison to "normal" radar/comm ? Yuri |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Yes! yes! future would not be wonderful without a cell phone jammer. More and more people are using cell phones at the cost of public interests. What can we do to avoid those terrible dins produced by mobile phones?Are you still boring with the noises of phones at midnight? I have suffered it for a long time, for my peaceful family life. i bought a cell phone jammer from http://www.jamerall.com which is introduced by my friend. it is really cool, so share my happiness with you. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Pentagon admits Environment source for future wars | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 5 | February 23rd 04 01:33 PM |