A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Theory



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 10th 11, 01:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
November Bravo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Theory

On Sep 30, 6:19*pm, John Cochrane
wrote:
I posted a new article on the theory of course deviations.

http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...ndex.asp#maccr...

or directly

http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/john...ocs/deviations...

(If the links don't work google john cochrane soaring and you'll find
it under MacCready theory)

I'll try to get some magazine to publish it. Comments and improvements
welcome in the meantime. Yes, the daydreaming about soaring at the
office season has begun

John Cochrane
BB


Hats off to a most excellent work, Professor!

The math and charts explain the concepts very well while sitting in
the living room chair but I abandon them when I fly and tend to react
a bit more intuitively, being a creature of habit as much as being a
creature of reason. So, to develop good habits based on your
analyses, are there "rehearsals" or "repetitive exercises" that pilots
could take advantage of with a soaring simulator such as Condor?
Engineering the soaring simulator for a series of such exercises,
allowing the computer pilot to "retake the test", much like a student
does when taking a multiple choice question on an exam, would really
be fun and allow the principles, analyzed in your paper to become more
intuitive. It would be interesting if such "exercises" could be added
to the popular soaring simulators, much like examinations are given to
students during their progression in their studies.

Again, John, thank you for enlightening us. It was a joy to read!

John Iacobucci
  #2  
Old October 10th 11, 08:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,965
Default Theory

Very much enjoyed the article John.

I was surfing the online Soaring archive and came across another
article that seems to address the same question. I haven't had a
chance to read through it very thoroughly but SSA members or others
with piles of Soaring Magazines laying around the house might check
out the April 1981 edition. Article named "Course Deviations During
Cross-Country Soaring" on Page 34.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Theory Exam Alan Erskine[_3_] Aviation Photos 0 November 24th 08 02:55 PM
The 777 crash - another theory D Ramapriya Piloting 82 January 25th 08 03:27 PM
[Q] Strikefinder Theory of Operation [email protected] Home Built 11 September 19th 07 04:47 PM
Theory Q: Cold Air, Lower Fuel Consumption? john smith Piloting 30 February 7th 07 04:14 PM
so much for the big sky theory soxinbox Piloting 5 April 24th 06 08:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.