![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 10 November 2011 23:26:49 UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Step outside this little world of soaring, and think about why the automobile fatality rate has dropped so much over the last 50 years. The majority of the improvement comes from safety devices like divided highways, seat belts, crush zones, and other improvements in safety devices. While this is true, Eric, I wish to point out that all but one of the devices you mention are intended to save lives "during" the ensuing crash. Only the divided highway "prevents" the crash, and that by forcibly separating the traffic flow. To my knowledge there is no existing automotive device (except my wife) that screams out, "Stupid! You're going to get us killed!!".. On a negative side of your argument, the great decrease in fatalities has been matched by a great increase in permanent life-altering injuries. I leave it to individual discretion to determine which is personally preferable. -John |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:00:53 +0000, Jonathon May
wrote: There are those who think the string should be slightly off center in a thermal turn I have heard the phrasae" get the string pointing up"from an old bold pilot who was flying with me. Yup. 20 to 30 degrees in the glider that I'm flying. Andreas |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 8, 11:45*am, Westbender wrote:
On Nov 8, 9:44*am, GARY BOGGS wrote: I've often thought an audio yaw string would be a great idea. Especially while instructing. *Maybe instead of a noise, a shot of electricity to the ass would be better? *I am always amazed at how many pilots are perfectly happy to fly along in a slight slip all day... Boggs Part of me wonders just how much value it would add to have an alarm go off just when someone is under stress turning to final at low altitude where it's causing them to try to skid the ship around. I'd be stating the obvious that pilots should be better trained to not get themselves into such situations to begin with. My SZD55 has a mandatory (Canada) stall warning system - SP-3. It takes pitot pressure and pressure from another hole under the nose and uses pressure differential to work - you get a loud audio tone. It goes off frequently in thermalling, and at the start of flilght. I asked other 55 pilots, and they say they only really use it on the ridge, it's off otherwise. The system is here if you want to take a look: http://www.olk.com.pl/indexen.php?bo...roducts&lpx=26 If you calibrated it better - which apparently is possible, though I haven't done it, it might be your answer. OSTIV seems to like it. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/11/2011 5:50 AM, C-FFKQ (42) wrote:
On Thursday, 10 November 2011 23:26:49 UTC-5, Eric Greenwell wrote: Step outside this little world of soaring, and think about why the automobile fatality rate has dropped so much over the last 50 years. The majority of the improvement comes from safety devices like divided highways, seat belts, crush zones, and other improvements in safety devices. While this is true, Eric, I wish to point out that all but one of the devices you mention are intended to save lives "during" the ensuing crash. Only the divided highway "prevents" the crash, and that by forcibly separating the traffic flow. To my knowledge there is no existing automotive device (except my wife) that screams out, "Stupid! You're going to get us killed!!". It wasn't intended to be a definitive list, but only to point out that safety devices can and do save lives. If you limit it to prevention safety devices, it's still true. In gliders, examples are auto hookups for controls and spoilers that don't suck open. On a negative side of your argument, the great decrease in fatalities has been matched by a great increase in permanent life-altering injuries. I leave it to individual discretion to determine which is personally preferable. Are you saying the _rate_ of "permanent life-altering injuries" is higher now than 50 years ago? I am not aware of studies showing that is true. What I do read about is crashes with little or no injury, that surely would've resulted in severe injuries in autos from the 50's. In any case, I don't think the markedly improved cockpit crash protection from the ASW 24 on has increased the rate for gliders. Personally, I'll always choose greater crash protection, glider or car. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Odd and Probably Unique Alarm | Marco Leon | Piloting | 4 | July 7th 06 01:04 AM |
alarm tone in headset | [email protected] | Home Built | 4 | January 28th 05 12:28 AM |
Open Spoilers Alarm on tow | tango4 | Soaring | 12 | March 17th 04 06:18 PM |
ATC stand and deliver? (was: O'Hare Controllers Raise Alarm, Blame Small Planes | journeyman | Piloting | 13 | July 11th 03 05:55 PM |
O'Hare Controllers Raise Alarm, Blame Small Planes | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | July 10th 03 03:56 AM |