A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Officers..The Bridge at Remagen



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 04, 01:10 AM
Ed Majden
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Doyle"
Hang on Ed, surly you can't pin Dieppe on British ineptitude - being an
Allied venture, it needed Allied ratification. If anything it was a

Canadian
effort (something like 5,000 Canadian troops), the only British employed
were a number of commandos, IIRC about the same number of US Rangers were
also used. Plus what on earth did the Brits do to Hong Kong except turn it
into the prosperous place of commerce and business it is now?!
Can't argue with your stating that often British officers were born to


I'm not necessarily blaming the Brits for Dieppe except for Montbatten's
involvement. Canadian officers were just itching to get into action. The
whole plan was just stupid. Promised support did not materialize and the
numbers were not near enough for an effective assault. That's why Ike
didn't listen to the Russian's demand for a second front until the allies
were ready. As for Hong Kong, I'm talking about the stupid Canadian
decision to send a poorly equipped and poorly trained battalion into a place
they had no chance of winning. I don't think they even delayed the Japanese
victory at Hong Kong. It was a lost cause from the start. This was probably
much a political decision but the Generals must have agreed to it. People
killed and maimed for nothing with no hope of success. Just a plain stupid
loss of life. This was a decision by politicians and high ranking officers
not the grunts who suffered and died!
Ed


  #2  
Old February 27th 04, 07:45 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Majden" wrote in message
news:qOw%b.625931$ts4.78485@pd7tw3no...

"Jim Doyle"
Hang on Ed, surly you can't pin Dieppe on British ineptitude - being an
Allied venture, it needed Allied ratification. If anything it was a

Canadian
effort (something like 5,000 Canadian troops), the only British employed
were a number of commandos, IIRC about the same number of US Rangers

were
also used. Plus what on earth did the Brits do to Hong Kong except turn

it
into the prosperous place of commerce and business it is now?!
Can't argue with your stating that often British officers were born to


I'm not necessarily blaming the Brits for Dieppe except for

Montbatten's
involvement. Canadian officers were just itching to get into action. The
whole plan was just stupid. Promised support did not materialize and the
numbers were not near enough for an effective assault. That's why Ike
didn't listen to the Russian's demand for a second front until the allies
were ready. As for Hong Kong, I'm talking about the stupid Canadian
decision to send a poorly equipped and poorly trained battalion into a

place
they had no chance of winning. I don't think they even delayed the

Japanese
victory at Hong Kong. It was a lost cause from the start.


Rather like the Phillipines, Guam or Wake in fact

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A problem in the Military ? Nick Jade Military Aviation 54 March 15th 04 07:59 PM
Bridge at Remagen? ArtKramr Military Aviation 18 February 9th 04 05:24 PM
Why is Stealth So Important? James Dandy Military Aviation 148 January 20th 04 04:17 PM
Two programs help officers join JAG Corps Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 19th 03 11:33 PM
Question about the Arado... Bill Silvey Military Aviation 20 August 4th 03 03:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.