![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, Marc Ramsey wrote:
Someone needs to get in touch with Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Aerojet, they have the wrong names! ;^) From the ever-authoritative Wikipedia: A jet engine is a reaction engine that discharges a fast moving jet which generates thrust by jet propulsion in accordance with Newton's laws of motion. This broad definition of jet engines includes turbojets, turbofans, rockets, ramjets, and pulse jets. In general, most jet engines are internal combustion engines[1] but non- combusting forms also exist. In common parlance, the term jet engine loosely refers to an internal combustion airbreathing jet engine (a duct engine). These typically consist of an engine with a rotary (rotating) air compressor powered by a turbine ("Brayton cycle"), with the leftover power providing thrust via a propelling nozzle... So, yeah, in the strict technical sense you are correct: Any reaction motor that discharges a jet of exhaust can be called a jet. But I'm going to claim the broad low ground of "common parlance." Anyhow, your winch project with Bob Korves is looking good! http://ranlog.com/winch/ Let me know if you need some occasional welding or fabrication. If you've got one Bob K. on your project, two is going to be better, right? Thanks, (the other) Bob K. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 8:01*am, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
In common parlance, the term jet engine loosely refers to an internal combustion airbreathing jet engine (a duct engine). These typically consist of an engine with a rotary (rotating) air compressor powered by a turbine ("Brayton cycle"), with the leftover power providing thrust via a propelling nozzle... So, yeah, in the strict technical sense you are correct: Any reaction motor that discharges a jet of exhaust can be called a jet. But I'm going to claim the broad low ground of "common parlance." As late as the mid-60s, it was still common parlance to refer to "turbojet" engines, to distinguish them from other forms of jet propulsion (thus cleverly revealing that I'm old enough to remember). As a completely random aside, for those who might be interested in a key but now nearly forgotten figure in the history of both Jet Propulsion Labs and Aerojet, look up Jack Parsons in your favorite search engine. He was the quintessential "rocket scientist"... Anyhow, your winch project with Bob Korves is looking good! http://ranlog.com/winch/ Let me know if you need some occasional welding or fabrication. If you've got one Bob K. on your project, two is going to be better, right? We've hit that point where we're 90% done, and the remaining 10% is taking as long as the rest. Thanks for the offer! Marc |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote:
needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 8:05*pm, GM wrote:
On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. Alexander Lippisch (the Me163's designer): "If you put in your finger, you get back only the bone". I don't remember whether the fuel or the oxidizer was worse. T8 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 7:05*pm, GM wrote:
On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. i think i saw something online that the US acquired a few after the war and towed them with B-29's while test pilots checked them out. Perhaps we need to notify the Commemorative Air Force and see if they will put a towhook on Fifi! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 6:47*pm, Tony wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:05*pm, GM wrote: On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. i think i saw something online that the US acquired a few after the war and towed them with B-29's while test pilots checked them out. Perhaps we need to notify the Commemorative Air Force and see if they will put a towhook on Fifi! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmSNqHckry8 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:12:04 -0800, Bill D wrote:
On Mar 7, 6:47Â*pm, Tony wrote: On Mar 7, 7:05Â*pm, GM wrote: On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. i think i saw something online that the US acquired a few after the war and towed them with B-29's while test pilots checked them out. Perhaps we need to notify the Commemorative Air Force and see if they will put a towhook on Fifi! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmSNqHckry8 That's obviously the unpowered replica. Nearly a year ago I visited RAF Cosford on a wet day during a CGC gliding expedition to The Mynd. Cosford which has a fantastic collection of Cold War British aircraft including all the V-bombers as well as a wonderful collection of late 60s British experimental jets and a selection of WW2 aircraft including a Me-163B. I was intrigued to see it has a tow hook in exactly the same place as that replica and wonder why. Was it for aero-towed retrieves if it had to land out after a combat sortie and/or for moving them between airfields? -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 163 used 100% peroxide as the oxidizer. Nasty stuff that would
"burn" anything it could come in contact with. F-16 doesn't glide any better than a lawn dart. F-15 glides beautifully. I once rode in one that glided 75 miles from flight level 400, in flight idle, joker fuel, to pattern altitude without touching the throttle. mj |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:34:02 -0800, Martin Gregorie
wrote: On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:12:04 -0800, Bill D wrote: On Mar 7, 6:47 pm, Tony wrote: On Mar 7, 7:05 pm, GM wrote: On Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17:37 PM UTC-5, Tony wrote: needs a little work. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=276309655 Can this one be aero-towed or winch launched? Getting the fuel for the small rocket engine might become a problem. That stuff was said to have some nasty habits like catching fire when it comes in contact with certain materials and being extremely corrosive. i think i saw something online that the US acquired a few after the war and towed them with B-29's while test pilots checked them out. Perhaps we need to notify the Commemorative Air Force and see if they will put a towhook on Fifi! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmSNqHckry8 That's obviously the unpowered replica. Nearly a year ago I visited RAF Cosford on a wet day during a CGC gliding expedition to The Mynd. Cosford which has a fantastic collection of Cold War British aircraft including all the V-bombers as well as a wonderful collection of late 60s British experimental jets and a selection of WW2 aircraft including a Me-163B. I was intrigued to see it has a tow hook in exactly the same place as that replica and wonder why. Was it for aero-towed retrieves if it had to land out after a combat sortie and/or for moving them between airfields? Here's an excellent video with lots of detailed shots. Tost hook is clearly shown. Also, I'd never noticed the split flaps / drag devices which are deployed in this video. Revolutionaly airplane in many aspects. Craig -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DG 400 Motorglider for sale | Leo Montejo | Soaring | 8 | September 19th 10 12:40 AM |
DG 400 Motorglider for sale | Leo Montejo | Soaring | 0 | September 16th 10 04:35 PM |
Lambada Motorglider For Sale | JS[_3_] | Soaring | 10 | January 31st 08 06:19 PM |
For Sale - Cambridge 302 for Motorglider - Used | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | September 26th 05 07:05 PM |
MONI motorglider / sportplane for sale | Bill Berle | Aviation Marketplace | 7 | August 2nd 03 12:05 AM |