A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

WGC Mid-air reported



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 19th 12, 11:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

it is simple - flarm dosn't work if there are 30 gliders at one lift...
btw somme notices about FB dangerous flying was before this case so before using flarm more importand look out
  #12  
Old August 19th 12, 12:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
GM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 211
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

On Sunday, August 19, 2012 6:17:21 AM UTC-4, wrote:
it is simple - flarm dosn't work if there are 30 gliders at one lift... btw somme notices about FB dangerous flying was before this case so before using flarm more importand look out


it is simple - flarm dosn't work if there are 30 gliders at one lift...

Interesting! Is that statement based on personal experience or just an assumption? Have you flown with 30 (P-)FLARM equipped gliders in one thermal - or even 10 of them, for that matter?

btw somme notices about FB dangerous flying was before this case so before using flarm more importand look out

The same was said when GPS navigation was introduced .....



  #13  
Old August 19th 12, 12:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mark Dickson[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

Flarm hasn't just been introduced, it's been in use for years (in
Europe). It is recognised that in large gaggles Flarm is irrelevant.

The same was said when GPS navigation was introduced .....





  #14  
Old August 19th 12, 01:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
GM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 211
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

On Sunday, August 19, 2012 7:59:51 AM UTC-4, Mark Dickson wrote:
Flarm hasn't just been introduced, it's been in use for years (in Europe).. It is recognised that in large gaggles Flarm is irrelevant.


Mark - I am well aware of the fact that FLARM has been in use for years in Europe and the rest of the world and that it has a few short-commings but I am talking about Power-FLARM (P-FLARM) which is different and was just introduced in the US this year. So, please let's keep that in mind when discussing the incident at the worlds.
  #15  
Old August 19th 12, 02:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

On Sunday, August 19, 2012 6:29:06 AM UTC-6, GM wrote:
On Sunday, August 19, 2012 7:59:51 AM UTC-4, Mark Dickson wrote:

Flarm hasn't just been introduced, it's been in use for years (in Europe). It is recognised that in large gaggles Flarm is irrelevant.




Mark - I am well aware of the fact that FLARM has been in use for years in Europe and the rest of the world and that it has a few short-commings but I am talking about Power-FLARM (P-FLARM) which is different and was just introduced in the US this year. So, please let's keep that in mind when discussing the incident at the worlds.


Indeed!

Keep in mind it is still possible to collide when both pilots see each other. All it takes is for one to zig instead of a zag. It could have been as simple as a momentary error in judgement. At the level of the WGC, pilots are not just skilled they're also aggressive. Maybe separation got too small and closing rates got too high for just a second.

Is P-Flarm perfect? Of course not. Is it useful? Definitely.
  #16  
Old August 19th 12, 02:10 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Nadler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,610
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

On Sunday, August 19, 2012 8:29:06 AM UTC-4, GM wrote:
... I am talking about Power-FLARM (P-FLARM) which is different


No it is not. PowerFLARM runs the identical core code
as original FLARM. PowerFLARM does have better radios,
ADS-B, PCAS... which are not relevant to this discussion.
  #17  
Old August 19th 12, 04:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Richard Brisbourne[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

At 11:36 19 August 2012, GM wrote:
On Sunday, August 19, 2012 6:17:21 AM UTC-4, wrote:
it is simple - flarm dosn't work if there are 30 gliders at one lift...

btw somme notices about FB dangerous flying was before this case so

before
using flarm more importand look out

The same was said when GPS navigation was introduced .....

As a convinced long term user of Flarm, I can state confidently if you pay
much attention to it (and come to that GPS navigation) in a gaggle of 30
aggressively flown gliders, you are much more likely to hit something than
if you ignore it.

It's a valuable piece of kit, just not for that situation.




  #18  
Old August 19th 12, 04:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
GM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 211
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

On Sunday, August 19, 2012 11:12:30 AM UTC-4, Richard Brisbourne wrote:
At 11:36 19 August 2012, GM wrote: On Sunday, August 19, 2012 6:17:21 AM UTC-4, wrote: it is simple - flarm dosn't work if there are 30 gliders at one lift... btw somme notices about FB dangerous flying was before this case so before using flarm more importand look out The same was said when GPS navigation was introduced ..... As a convinced long term user of Flarm, I can state confidently if you pay much attention to it (and come to that GPS navigation) in a gaggle of 30 aggressively flown gliders, you are much more likely to hit something than if you ignore it. It's a valuable piece of kit, just not for that situation.


Hi Richard,
could not agree more - nothing replaces the Mark-8 eye balls kept outside! P-FLARM is new to the US and I have flown with it for only a few month, including one national contest. The most P-FLARM equipped gliders I have flown with in one gaggle was 3 and since all flew well behaved, there were no flase alarms. Thinking that one can use P-FLARM or any FLARM to barrel through the sky blindly is a recipe for disaster. I trust that P-FLARM will become a valuable addition.
Uli
  #19  
Old August 21st 12, 04:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ramy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 746
Default WGC Mid-air reported - Organizer Statement

Do we need to wait 1+ year for the final NTSB report to maybe find out if the mid air happened in a gaggle and if they had Flarm on board?
I am sure many knows the answer, how about sharing it with the rest of us?

Ramy
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fossett's reported fuel shortage Gary Evans Soaring 7 March 3rd 05 08:03 PM
Reported by CNN this morning!!!!! Capt. Doug Home Built 48 July 22nd 03 03:26 AM
Reported by CNN this morning!!!!! Capt. Doug Owning 36 July 22nd 03 03:26 AM
Reported by CNN this morning!!!!! Capt. Doug Piloting 46 July 22nd 03 03:26 AM
Reported by CNN this morning!!!!! Someguy Owning 0 July 19th 03 07:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.