![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:23:35 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... "Yet". You need to add that. As the order volume increases, the unit cost decreases. Simple concept--even you should be able to grasp it. No Kevin, the $110 million does not include any amortization; therefore there is no decrease in price for volume under "each" accounting. These airplanes are costing about $220 million per airframe under current buy numbers and will probably reach $300 million per airframe when all the reductions in the buy are done. (160 pieces) Costing of aircraft is never a simple exercise and it is increasingly driven not by accounting, but by political posturing. If one wants a contract, the pricing is based on unit fly-away cost. If one opposes the purchase, then the cost is fully amortized, life-cycle cost with spares and support equipment---OMIGOD, we can't afford it! When ATF was first put out for proposal the $$$/weight criteria were $30M per airplane and 50K pounds max. Clearly the weight is an objective measurement, but the dollar cost was releated to a purchase of 600+ and was going to be unit fly-away cost. As the buy numbers have reduced (a not unreasonable reaction to a considerably changed threat), the cost per unit has risen. Costs of $220M per aircraft are clearly loaded numbers with full R&D incorporated. Once you've amortized R&D costs, however--and that's been done already in the long term contract numbers--then the cost per unit for additional purchases can be expressed in a fairly straightforward number. Want to buy fifty more? Then that will cost you XXX dollars. The factory is built, the tools are in place, the R&D has been already incurred and all that is going to be added is material and labor. Throughout the process you can revisit and for political argument's sake recalculate the total cost of the program. That doesn't relate to contracts, but it does relate to an averaging of unit cost. Buy more units and lo, the cost per unit goes down. Cut the buy and, surprise, the cost per unit goes up. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | December 2nd 04 07:00 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |