![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:20:06 PM UTC-4, wrote:
With respect, the belief 1-1/2 frequencies will handle all the bandwidth of competition P-PC is shocking. My suspicion is there will be considerable bandwidth use which will only reduce after seasons of practice and experience. It is also my belief the lack of dedicated P-PC frequencies will create generous "road rage" and interrupt pilot concentration; something competition soaring absolutely does not need. Many pilots already "mute" their radios with just the current distraction of 123.3 and 123.5. Imagine the increase in distraction with the addition of P-PC I'm all for team flying but its my belief SSA let this one out of the oven half baked without including provisions for FCC/FAA dedicated P-PC frequencies. The competition rules committee, in response to strong lobbying by a number of people, agreed to permit P to P communication in regionals, subject to contest organizers determining it would be appropriate for their contest. The issue of available frequencies is not new. It is one of the reasons that this this initiative was not undertaken previously. Sporting considerations are another. Each "solution" to the issues related to P to P communication and associated team flying efforts has complications. This is an opportunity to try some of those out and see if there is a practical way to implement team flying,IF the pilots determine they want it long term. UH |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The competition rules committee, in response to strong lobbying by a number of people, agreed to permit P to P communication in regionals, subject to contest organizers determining it would be appropriate for their contest. The issue of available frequencies is not new. It is one of the reasons that this this initiative was not undertaken previously. Sporting considerations are another. Each "solution" to the issues related to P to P communication and associated team flying efforts has complications. This is an opportunity to try some of those out and see if there is a practical way to implement team flying,IF the pilots determine they want it long term. UH Like Hank said... The RC didn't issue a whole list of procedures and frequencies, because those will vary tremendously from contest to contest. A 5 glider sports class regional doing some mentoring is different from a 30 glider super-regional with US team pilots practicing pair flying. The RC job is also primarily to work on what works from a sporting or safety perspective. And we don't know ahead of time what frequencies work, how much demand there is to talk, etc. etc. This is an experiment, and we need pilots interested in the project to find out if air frequencies are a serious problem, and if so how to solve the problem. John Cochrane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help needed with communication between a Colibri and IPAQ | Tim Taylor | Soaring | 7 | February 16th 10 08:05 AM |
lx 7007 PC communication | Rejean Dallaire | Soaring | 2 | December 22nd 08 05:54 PM |
Bendix King KY 97A TSO VHF Communication Transceiver | NEW-USER | Home Built | 0 | February 28th 08 01:40 AM |
Communication Specialist Inc. TR720 radio | Heino & Deanne Weisberg | Home Built | 4 | September 14th 05 10:32 PM |
Air to Ground Communication | Scott | Home Built | 4 | August 19th 03 03:39 PM |