A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

(USA) FlarmNet usage



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 27th 13, 02:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jim[_31_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default (USA) FlarmNet usage

On Thursday, April 25, 2013 4:00:17 PM UTC-4, John Carlyle wrote:
Thanks, Paul, that answers questions about three of the license items.



Can you shed light on the other extra cost options listed in the V2.79 release notes? Specifically, in the US, are the Audio (AUD), the Second FLARM antenna connection (RFB, and the Garmin TIS output (TIS)extra cost options?



Thanks in advance.



-John, Q3



On Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:31:08 PM UTC-4, Paul Remde wrote:

Hi John,




The U.S. price for PowerFLARM Core and Portable includes IGC Approval as


standard. That has been the plan from the start. In Europe it is an


option.




Engine Noise Level functionality has always been promoted as an extra cost


option in the USA.




Best Regards,




Paul Remde


Cumulus Soaring, Inc.


__________________________




"John Carlyle" wrote in message


...




Thanks for the "heads-up", Evan.




The release notes are very interesting. FLARM is now going to charge a fee


for (among other things):




* Engine Noise Level recording (ENL)


* IGC approval (IGC)


* Second FLARM antenna connection (RFB)




If this scheme is applicable to the US, too, then I'll be using my


Volkslogger along with PowerFLARM. At least I'll get an IGC approved flight


trace good for up to world records (OK, stop laughing) with engine noise


monitoring - for free.




-John, Q3






On Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:49:25 AM UTC-4, Evan Ludeman wrote:


It works and it's here (in beta) now.




http://www.powerflarm.aero/index.php...ge-and-support




I don't use or care much about flarmnet, but I do recommend the 2.79 beta


because it appears to have better pcas sensitivity and reliability and it


allows one to easily update the display to 3.1, which improves readability


significantly.




Sure wish they'd chuck those silly, useless pcas circles on the butterfly


displays in favor of digital range information (like Zaon). I've


suggested this, without reply. If you agree, or have a better idea, I'd


encourage you to make your opinion known.




Evan Ludeman / T8


John/Q3, I sent an email to (that's the email on the update page) asking the same question. The release notes clearly say only units that sold WITH the second antenna are grandfathered. When I unpacked my PF core I was surprised it only had one antenna (especially when all the range issues were being aired on RAS). I immediately purchased my second antenna from Paul last year and yet to install it.
Jim/PC
  #2  
Old April 28th 13, 03:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
kirk.stant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,260
Default (USA) FlarmNet usage

On Saturday, April 27, 2013 3:53:54 PM UTC+2, Jim wrote:

John/Q3, I sent an email to (that's the email on the update page) asking the same question. The release notes clearly say only units that sold WITH the second antenna are grandfathered. When I unpacked my PF core I was surprised it only had one antenna (especially when all the range issues were being aired on RAS). I immediately purchased my second antenna from Paul last year and yet to install it.

Jim/PC


I'm curious also. All the documentation and propaganda about the PowerFLARM Brick (now Core) touted the fact that you had the ability to use two flarm antennas. I've installed two antennas on mine, because of the need to mount the primary way in the front of my LS6 and wanting as much coverage as possible.

But mine did not come with a second flarm antenna - I purchased it from Cumulus Soaring after taking delivery of my PFB (as one of the original Arizona group purchase).

So clarification by Flarm would be nice. I'm OK with having to pay for ENL (since I don't have an engine :^), or new data formats (Garmin TIS) that weren't advertised, but items like the IGC logger and second antenna were part of the original sales pitch, IMO.

Immediate question: Is the second flarm antenna active on my PFB? Will it be if I install 2.79 beta?

Kirk
66
  #3  
Old April 28th 13, 05:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Richard[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 551
Default (USA) FlarmNet usage

On Sunday, April 28, 2013 7:35:02 AM UTC-7, kirk.stant wrote:
On Saturday, April 27, 2013 3:53:54 PM UTC+2, Jim wrote: John/Q3, I sent an email to (that's the email on the update page) asking the same question. The release notes clearly say only units that sold WITH the second antenna are grandfathered. When I unpacked my PF core I was surprised it only had one antenna (especially when all the range issues were being aired on RAS). I immediately purchased my second antenna from Paul last year and yet to install it. Jim/PC I'm curious also. All the documentation and propaganda about the PowerFLARM Brick (now Core) touted the fact that you had the ability to use two flarm antennas. I've installed two antennas on mine, because of the need to mount the primary way in the front of my LS6 and wanting as much coverage as possible. But mine did not come with a second flarm antenna - I purchased it from Cumulus Soaring after taking delivery of my PFB (as one of the original Arizona group purchase). So clarification by Flarm would be nice. I'm OK with having to pay for ENL (since I don't have an engine :^), or new data formats (Garmin TIS) that weren't advertised, but items like the IGC logger and second antenna were part of the original sales pitch, IMO. Immediate question: Is the second flarm antenna active on my PFB? Will it be if I install 2.79 beta? Kirk 66


Kirk,

The Flarm B antenna port is active, but PowerFlarm does not provide two antennas.
Flarm A is transmit and receive.
Flarm B is receive only.

Richard
www.craggyaero.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PF Portable and Flarmnet Andy[_1_] Soaring 0 October 5th 12 02:55 PM
FLARMnet file update Andy[_1_] Soaring 1 September 25th 12 06:59 PM
FlarmNet Brad[_2_] Soaring 6 August 26th 12 06:35 PM
Usage fee process Danny Deger Piloting 3 April 11th 07 08:27 PM
Oil usage GE Owning 14 May 20th 04 07:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.