![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 4:27:04 PM UTC-6, Ralph Jones wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:00:58 -0700 (PDT), Bill D wrote: [snip] To me, pressure ports on the top and bottom of the nose cone seems the least intrusive. What about contamination by runway crud? rj No worse than static ports or pitot tubes. The ports I'm thinking of would be just like static ports - flush with the surface. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another stall spin | Jp Stewart | Soaring | 153 | September 14th 12 07:25 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Stall/ Spin testing the RV-12 | cavelamb himself[_4_] | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 08 07:01 PM |
Glider Stall Spin Video on YouTube | ContestID67 | Soaring | 13 | July 5th 07 08:56 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |