![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 11:15:35 AM UTC-7, Soartech wrote:
For some reason my glider came with an indicator with a ridiculously high maximum reading. I would like to replace it with something that has much more space in the most often used regions of the dial. Can you just install a new instrument or does it need to be somehow calibrated or tuned to an individual Pitot tube installation? Thanks for your experience. The ridiculously high reading should be a good excuse to fly faster (Kidding!). Check your maintenance manual and possibly the TDCS and there should be a list of approved instruments. You also have to make sure the A/S has the proper markings. Granted, If your ship is experimental you could possibly do anything you want as long as your mechanic signs off but I would not use a mechanic who would sign a condition inspection without properly marked instruments. Calibration is a good idea but it is complicated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I forgot to say this glider is experimental. So you are saying that any new airspeed indicator (factory fresh) should be accurate to some reasonable extent with a standard Pitot tube installation? Is calibration normally done on new installations or not? As far as markings on the dial, they are easy to duplicate so no problem there.
The ridiculously high reading should be a good excuse to fly faster (Kidding!). Check your maintenance manual and possibly the TDCS and there should be a list of approved instruments. You also have to make sure the A/S has the proper markings. Granted, If your ship is experimental you could possibly do anything you want as long as your mechanic signs off but I would not use a mechanic who would sign a condition inspection without properly marked instruments. Calibration is a good idea but it is complicated. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 10:43:09 AM UTC-7, Soartech wrote:
I forgot to say this glider is experimental. So you are saying that any new airspeed indicator (factory fresh) should be accurate to some reasonable extent with a standard Pitot tube installation? Is calibration normally done on new installations or not? As far as markings on the dial, they are easy to duplicate so no problem there. The ridiculously high reading should be a good excuse to fly faster (Kidding!). Check your maintenance manual and possibly the TDCS and there should be a list of approved instruments. You also have to make sure the A/S has the proper markings. Granted, If your ship is experimental you could possibly do anything you want as long as your mechanic signs off but I would not use a mechanic who would sign a condition inspection without properly marked instruments. Calibration is a good idea but it is complicated. Check out this page on W&W http://www.wingsandwheels.com/altime...rad_winter.htm Should explain most everything and if you have further questions give Sean a call. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for a used 57 mm airspeed indicator | Scott Alexander[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | October 13th 12 07:28 PM |
Airspeed Indicator Strangeness | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 6 | June 9th 08 01:24 PM |
Airspeed Indicator problems | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | June 19th 07 02:33 AM |
verifying airspeed indicator | Heino & Deanne Weisberg | Home Built | 11 | October 22nd 05 07:36 PM |
Need glider airspeed indicator | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 05 09:57 PM |