![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 08 May 2004 02:35:18 GMT, Thomas J. Paladino Jr. wrote:
Perhaps the Germans would have been far better advised at that point to build smaller, cheaper and easier to operate tanks in greater quantities, so that maybe they would actually be around for more than one fight. I'm sure that with their obvious technical prowess, they would have been able to construct a simple, light tank that would have been slightly better than the Sherman They produced several: the Pz IV, the Hetzer. (which is really all it had to be), and could be produced in good enough numbers to close the tank gap to maybe 5-to-1, and be user friendly enough that inexperienced tank crews could effectively operate it. Now that could have made a real difference. I suspect that last requirement's impossible: you need experienced crews and commanders to handle formations of tanks properly, so that you can site them in good defensive positions, use good tactics, don't silhouete them against the sky, etc. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (Email: zen19725 at zen dot co dot uk) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"robert arndt" wrote in message
m... http://www.achtungpanzer.com/pz5.htm SNIP Rob Um, what does this have to do with military aviation? Other than the military aviation of the Allies hurting German tank production? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article m, David
E. Powell writes "robert arndt" wrote in message om... http://www.achtungpanzer.com/pz5.htm SNIP Rob Um, what does this have to do with military aviation? Other than the military aviation of the Allies hurting German tank production? Or Allied military aviation hurting German tanks. The answer to the King Tiger was the rocket-firing Typhoon... Regards, -- Moramarth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 8 May 2004 11:19:31 +0100, Moramarth wrote:
In article m, David E. Powell writes "robert arndt" wrote in message . com... http://www.achtungpanzer.com/pz5.htm SNIP Rob Um, what does this have to do with military aviation? Other than the military aviation of the Allies hurting German tank production? Or Allied military aviation hurting German tanks. The answer to the King Tiger was the rocket-firing Typhoon... Regards, Along with the rocket firing P-47s, P-51s, and P-38s Al Minyard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robert arndt" wrote in message m... http://www.achtungpanzer.com/pz5.htm You criticize the King Tiger when historically the Allies that actually met it in combat gave it the name "Royal Tiger" out of fear AND respect. It WAS a formidible machine. Sure but the Wehrmacht had less than 500 of them. The Western allies alone had more than 40,000 tanks. Most Allied soldiers never saw a King Tiger. Keith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robert arndt" wrote in message m... http://www.achtungpanzer.com/pz5.htm Better than any mass-produced piece-of-**** Sherman (except the Firefly British conversion). Russian T-34/85s and JS-2 tanks were even better than American ones and even they didn't fare well in engagements with the King Tiger. Ah, so King Tiger is a TANK. I thought it was a fruit. Largest lemon in the world, to be precise. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 8 May 2004 13:55:58 +0300, "Yama" wrote:
Ah, so King Tiger is a TANK. I thought it was a fruit. Largest lemon in the world, to be precise. For a true 'new underwear required' heavy tank of that period . The JS-7 prototype would be rather hard to be disregard. Thank Insert your deity here that the russian railway system wasnt upto transporting them. greg -- "vying with Platt for the largest gap between capability and self perception" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
robert arndt twisted the electrons to say:
Better than any mass-produced piece-of-**** Sherman (except the Firefly British conversion). Well, if the Sherman Firefly is adequate then surely the M10 Achilles and the Comet are also adequate? (Though I wouldn't want to be in the Achilles with the manual traverse only turret.) Besides which, if the war lasts any longer then the Centurion and the M26 Pershing with their 20-pounder and 90mm guns (respectively) get in the game ... -- These opinions might not even be mine ... Let alone connected with my employer ... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Nazis lost, get over it.
King Leonidas and Confederates lost too!. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Some new photos of the 2003 Tiger Meet (Cambrai) | Franck | Military Aviation | 0 | January 2nd 04 10:55 PM |
Airman tells of grandfather's Flying Tiger days | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 11th 03 04:55 AM |
1979 Tiger for Sale | Flynn | Aviation Marketplace | 65 | September 11th 03 08:06 PM |
P-47/51 deflection shots into the belly of the German tanks,reality | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 131 | September 7th 03 09:02 PM |