A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Generation Vario's



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 23rd 14, 10:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Richard Frawley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default New Generation Vario's

On Friday, 23 May 2014 09:15:40 UTC-4, Tim Taylor wrote:
Richard,



I fly with a V7 and still have a 302 as well. The 302 is 99% as good as the V7. Unless you are racing I actually prefer the 302. It has better tones and of course has the logger as well. Why is the V7 1% better? It does have a better gust filter, so a few times a day it filters out false thermal the 302 does not.



If I was not racing I would buy a 302, it is a great value.


Thanks Tim, thats good feedback.
  #2  
Old May 26th 14, 03:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Luke Szczepaniak
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 177
Default New Generation Vario's

On 05/23/2014 5:34 PM, Richard Frawley wrote:
On Friday, 23 May 2014 09:15:40 UTC-4, Tim Taylor wrote:
Richard,



I fly with a V7 and still have a 302 as well. The 302 is 99% as good as the V7. Unless you are racing I actually prefer the 302. It has better tones and of course has the logger as well. Why is the V7 1% better? It does have a better gust filter, so a few times a day it filters out false thermal the 302 does not.



If I was not racing I would buy a 302, it is a great value.


Thanks Tim, thats good feedback.


Hi Richard, I also fly with a V7 and a 302. I think a lot of our
opinions are based on previous experience so bear that in mind when
reading replies . Most of my flying has been with LX instruments and
I prefer the V7 audio tones over the 302. If you're used to and like
the CAI 302 then you may prefer the CnV.

Having flown with the gust filter for the last two seasons it is
"almost" a must have feature. I think it filters out closer to 5% of
false tries rather than 1% but Tim probably has a better feel for the
air than I do so YMMV. The vario works great out of the box but can
also be tweaked extensively to your liking . I can not comment on the
other new varios (Butterfly, CNV) as I have not flown with those.

The V7 has a built in FLARM display. When connected to a FLARM source
it will give you the standard LED circle display fo both FLAMR and
P-CAS* targets (*Powerflarm has a bug to work out with P-CAS data on the
DB9 connector but from what I hear the fix is already available in a
beta FW). Additionally the V7 can be configured to give you spoken
traffic advisories (traffic 12 0'clock high etc..) which makes it more
useful then a beep that makes you focus on the display and then back out
of the cockpit.

Luke Szczepaniak

  #3  
Old May 26th 14, 05:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default New Generation Vario's

On Monday, May 26, 2014 7:14:26 AM UTC-7, Luke Szczepaniak wrote:
On 05/23/2014 5:34 PM, Richard Frawley wrote:

On Friday, 23 May 2014 09:15:40 UTC-4, Tim Taylor wrote:


Richard,








I fly with a V7 and still have a 302 as well. The 302 is 99% as good as the V7. Unless you are racing I actually prefer the 302. It has better tones and of course has the logger as well. Why is the V7 1% better? It does have a better gust filter, so a few times a day it filters out false thermal the 302 does not.








If I was not racing I would buy a 302, it is a great value.




Thanks Tim, thats good feedback.






Hi Richard, I also fly with a V7 and a 302. I think a lot of our

opinions are based on previous experience so bear that in mind when

reading replies . Most of my flying has been with LX instruments and

I prefer the V7 audio tones over the 302. If you're used to and like

the CAI 302 then you may prefer the CnV.



Having flown with the gust filter for the last two seasons it is

"almost" a must have feature. I think it filters out closer to 5% of

false tries rather than 1% but Tim probably has a better feel for the

air than I do so YMMV. The vario works great out of the box but can

also be tweaked extensively to your liking . I can not comment on the

other new varios (Butterfly, CNV) as I have not flown with those.



The V7 has a built in FLARM display. When connected to a FLARM source

it will give you the standard LED circle display fo both FLAMR and

P-CAS* targets (*Powerflarm has a bug to work out with P-CAS data on the

DB9 connector but from what I hear the fix is already available in a

beta FW). Additionally the V7 can be configured to give you spoken

traffic advisories (traffic 12 0'clock high etc..) which makes it more

useful then a beep that makes you focus on the display and then back out

of the cockpit.



Luke Szczepaniak


That is a good point about the warning interface on modern various. I had too many buzzers in my glider, when a buzzer sounded you could spend quite a long time figuring out exactly what it meant. Now with my Butterfly Vario, a clear, attractive (!) voice says " LANDING GEAR NOT EXTENDED", or "TRAFFIC, 12 0'CLOCK, HIGH". Its hard to mistake that kind of warning.
  #4  
Old May 26th 14, 05:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 192
Default New Generation Vario's


I have a 302, a CN vario, and a V9 installed here and there so can compare these. I'm also very fussy about varios, as the CN people will attest.

The 302 is a very very good vario. But it's not in production and it's not as robust as the new ones. It has to be set up right and properly compensated.

Like all these varios it does not like leaks, it does not like flow varios on the same circuit, and it wants the pressures all coming from the same place, not the probe. If you have leaks, flow varios connected together, or you're not using pitot, static, and TE from the probe all these varios will disappoint.

The CN vario is also very very good. The first generation of the filtering software was, in my opinion, a bit better than 302. The second generation (last summer) removed a lot of bugs, but was a step backward in filtering, especially in strong weather and full of water. Now that the navigation stuff is behind them, I gather CN is working again on filtering. Frequent software updates and active development is a plus.

The V9 is a great vario out of the box. The filtering is excellent. It too needs to be set up right and correctly compensated.

It has one big downside for me so far. Where the CN and 302 vario are set up that "2 knots up" means "2 knots up" in both speed command and climb mode, the V9 tones in speed command are set to correspond to horizontal speed differences not vertical ones. It uses somehting like the same tone for "10 knots fast" that it does for "2 knots up." But in a modern glider, the speed to fly is much more sensitive to the lift value. So, bottom line, the tones swing around in speed command mode much more than they do in climb mode. Where this is a problem is when you slow down and sniff around but haven't decided to climb. In speed mode, you'll hear garbage, much too optimistic in lift. So, you have to set it up to switch to climb mode at about 70 knots.

All of these varios have hardware in them that could allow for amazing things, not yet implemented in software.

John Cochrane
  #5  
Old May 26th 14, 05:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 29
Default New Generation Vario's

How do the V7 / V9 display Netto information? Can you setup a switch?

  #6  
Old May 26th 14, 07:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 209
Default New Generation Vario's

I am on my second season with a V7. Like John I experience less than 100 percent satisfaction as I slow back into the "sniffing around" speeds. Speed to fly actions and tones are excellent when running flat out. When feeling the need to stop and thermal I find myself using my secondary mechanical vario more than I previously did. As a fix I installed a switch near my trim knob and convenient to my left hand. I switch to climb mode manually when transitioning to "I need a thermal" mode of thinking. Downside is this puts LK 8000 in climb mode also as I have the PNA and V7 synced. This throws off my Task Stats in the LK8000.

All said I do love my V7.

Lane
XF
  #7  
Old May 27th 14, 07:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Craig Funston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default New Generation Vario's

On Monday, May 26, 2014 11:01:02 AM UTC-7, wrote:
I am on my second season with a V7. Like John I experience less than 100 percent satisfaction as I slow back into the "sniffing around" speeds. Speed to fly actions and tones are excellent when running flat out. When feeling the need to stop and thermal I find myself using my secondary mechanical vario more than I previously did. As a fix I installed a switch near my trim knob and convenient to my left hand. I switch to climb mode manually when transitioning to "I need a thermal" mode of thinking. Downside is this puts LK 8000 in climb mode also as I have the PNA and V7 synced. This throws off my Task Stats in the LK8000.



All said I do love my V7.



Lane

XF


Lane,

I also have the V7, LK8000 combination and find it works well. Same issues with sniff mode and will probably change the flap switch to engage thermal mode at 0 rather than +1. I've got a lazy question (haven't gone through all the manuals yet). Is there a way to disengage only the McCready communication between LK and the V7 to allow keeping the LK on a final glide MC while setting the V7 to a lower cruise MC?

The V7 firmware upgrade this year also opened up more options for using the acceleration sensing functions built into the instrument. Does anyone have a clear understanding of the algorithm being used and what advantages it should offer?

Thanks,
Craig 7Q
  #8  
Old May 26th 14, 11:34 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Galloway[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default New Generation Vario's

At 16:49 26 May 2014, wrote:

I have a 302, a CN vario, and a V9 installed here and there so

can compare
=
these. I'm also very fussy about varios, as the CN people will

attest.=20

The 302 is a very very good vario. But it's not in production

and it's not
=
as robust as the new ones. It has to be set up right and

properly
compensat=
ed.=20

Like all these varios it does not like leaks, it does not like

flow varios
=
on the same circuit, and it wants the pressures all coming

from the same
pl=
ace, not the probe. If you have leaks, flow varios connected

together, or
y=
ou're not using pitot, static, and TE from the probe all these

varios will
=
disappoint.=20

The CN vario is also very very good. The first generation of

the filtering
=
software was, in my opinion, a bit better than 302. The

second generation
(=
last summer) removed a lot of bugs, but was a step backward

in filtering,
e=
specially in strong weather and full of water. Now that the

navigation
stuf=
f is behind them, I gather CN is working again on filtering.

Frequent
softw=
are updates and active development is a plus.=20

The V9 is a great vario out of the box. The filtering is

excellent. It too
=
needs to be set up right and correctly compensated.=20

It has one big downside for me so far. Where the CN and 302

vario are set
u=
p that "2 knots up" means "2 knots up" in both speed

command and climb
mode=
, the V9 tones in speed command are set to correspond to

horizontal speed
d=
ifferences not vertical ones. It uses somehting like the same

tone for "10
=
knots fast" that it does for "2 knots up." But in a modern

glider, the
spee=
d to fly is much more sensitive to the lift value. So, bottom

line, the
ton=
es swing around in speed command mode much more than

they do in climb
mode.=
Where this is a problem is when you slow down and sniff

around but
haven't=
decided to climb. In speed mode, you'll hear garbage, much

too optimistic
=
in lift. So, you have to set it up to switch to climb mode at

about 70
knot=
s. =20

All of these varios have hardware in them that could allow for

amazing
thin=
gs, not yet implemented in software.=20

John Cochrane


John,

I don't have a problem with the V9 audio but had to think about
the options as there are 7 climb and 5 cruise audio tone options
to choose between so it should be possible to choose a
combination that gives good information and differentiation
between climb and cruise. I have the V9 needle set for Relative
in cruise mode and so I have selected the "SC Mixed" cruise
audio mode. To quote the manual, "for positive relative values
the sound represents relative; for negative relative values the
sound represents SC". This makes reasonable sense to me
intuitively in flight although I prefer the Borgelt idea of
changing to climb tone when the relative is higher than the MC
setting


John Galloway



  #9  
Old May 27th 14, 12:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,965
Default New Generation Vario's

My favorite vario is the one that is pointed UP
  #10  
Old May 27th 14, 04:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike the Strike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 952
Default New Generation Vario's

On Monday, May 26, 2014 4:33:03 PM UTC-7, Tony wrote:
My favorite vario is the one that is pointed UP


In Arizona, ours all go to 11 knots!

Mike
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Next generation AH Soaring 10 March 18th 13 11:02 PM
Next Generation Pilot? [email protected] Piloting 6 December 30th 07 02:12 AM
SSA-OLC Generation 2.0 Doug Haluza Soaring 26 October 19th 06 02:46 AM
The Most Exploited Generation John Galt Military Aviation 21 June 12th 04 02:53 PM
What is a nth Generation fighter? Tom Nealon Military Aviation 64 December 17th 03 10:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.