|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
May 14th 04, 11:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 14 May 2004 16:48:46 -0400, Cub Driver
wrote: The multibillion-dollar U.S. ballistic missile shield due to start operating by Sept. 30 appears incapable of shooting down any incoming warheads, an independent scientists' group said. Which only goes to show you the quality of "scientists" writing the report. The Union of Concerned Scientists, perhaps? Oh I don't doubt they are scientists but they are scientists with an agenda. Would you consider a scientist that is incapable of being objective a *good* scientist? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| V-4 Missile Possibilities | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 42 | January 23rd 04 05:40 AM |
| Australia to participate in US missile defence program | David Bromage | Military Aviation | 40 | December 13th 03 01:52 PM |
| Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 02:58 PM |
| Airborne ballistic missile defense? | Henry J. Cobb | Military Aviation | 1 | August 20th 03 09:17 AM |
Hybrid Mode
