![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walt wrote:
BTW, on the deck 760 mph is close to .1M (STP), so when your car is showing 76 mph, you're buzzing along at about .1M. (For interstate travel, 75 mph is 12.5 miles in 10 minutes . . . we just completed about 6000 miles of driving where I used this sort of mental T=D/R to predict ETAs thus boggling my better half. Same sort of calcs can be used ina light plane such as C152 . . . 6gph = 1 gal in 10 min, 90KTS = 1.5 nm/min; 120(tailwind)=2 nm/min. As above, use the calculator if things look tight. (If they do you've screwed up.) Glad I am not the only one running continuous ETAS while cruising down the Interstate :-) Drift gets to be a bitch though! Habit! Ingrained by instructors who are really old farts now! Rick Clark MFE |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(OXMORON1) wrote:
Walt wrote: BTW, on the deck 760 mph is close to .1M (STP), so when your car is showing 76 mph, you're buzzing along at about .1M. (For interstate travel, 75 mph is 12.5 miles in 10 minutes . . . we just completed about 6000 miles of driving where I used this sort of mental T=D/R to predict ETAs thus boggling my better half. Same sort of calcs can be used ina light plane such as C152 . . . 6gph = 1 gal in 10 min, 90KTS = 1.5 nm/min; 120(tailwind)=2 nm/min. As above, use the calculator if things look tight. (If they do you've screwed up.) Glad I am not the only one running continuous ETAS while cruising down the Interstate :-) Drift gets to be a bitch though! Habit! Ingrained by instructors who are really old farts now! Speaking of winds and such, as an "old fart" flight instructor myself (it's all downhill after 40, right?) here is a little homemade question that I find many aviators both military and civil routinely get wrong: If you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and fly back to airport "B" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had made the flight in no-wind conditions? Yea or nay? (Correct answer gets a cigar and large bucket of his favorite drink....) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Marron wrote:
Speaking of winds and such, as an "old fart" flight instructor myself (it's all downhill after 40, right?) here is a little homemade question that I find many aviators both military and civil routinely get wrong: If you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and fly back to airport "B" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had made the flight in no-wind conditions? Yea or nay? (Correct answer gets a cigar and large bucket of his favorite drink....) Oops! The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS." In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had made the flight in no-wind conditions? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike came back with:
Oops! The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS." Glad you made that correction, I was still orbiting "B" Rick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(OXMORON1) wrote:
Mike came back with: Oops! The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS." Glad you made that correction, I was still orbiting "B" Heh. But now that you've flown back to "A" and landed, in order to get the cigar and bucket of your fave drink you have to hazard an answer to the question. ![]() Rick |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, you are exposed to the headwind for a longer time. Any wind from any
direction will increase your round trip time. Al (a very old flight instructor) "Mike Marron" wrote in message ... Mike Marron wrote: Speaking of winds and such, as an "old fart" flight instructor myself (it's all downhill after 40, right?) here is a little homemade question that I find many aviators both military and civil routinely get wrong: If you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and fly back to airport "B" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had made the flight in no-wind conditions? Yea or nay? (Correct answer gets a cigar and large bucket of his favorite drink....) Oops! The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS." In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had made the flight in no-wind conditions? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Marron wrote:
Oops! The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS." In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had made the flight in no-wind conditions? Okay, I'll bite. Looks like the no-wind solution is 4 hours, the headwind/tailwind solution is 4.17 hours. Just in case I win, I prefer Lagavulin 16. I'll skip the seegar. Jeff |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jeff Crowell" wrote:
Mike Marron wrote: Oops! The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS." In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had made the flight in no-wind conditions? Okay, I'll bite. Looks like the no-wind solution is 4 hours, the headwind/tailwind solution is 4.17 hours. Just in case I win, I prefer Lagavulin 16. I'll skip the seegar. Al Gerharter was the first to answer correctly, but disqualified himself by admitting that he's an old hand instructor so it looks like you won indeed. Congratulations! A large bucket of Lagavulin 16 is on the way... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had made the flight in no-wind conditions? Okay, I'll bite. Looks like the no-wind solution is 4 hours, the headwind/tailwind solution is 4.17 hours. Because you spend more time going against the wind and fighting it, than you spend with the wind and benefitting from it, so thats why you lose time Ron Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4) Silver City Tanker Base |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Ron) wrote:
Because you spend more time going against the wind and fighting it, than you spend with the wind and benefitting from it, so thats why you lose time Amazing how many folks fail to grasp this concept. Instead of forever battling headwinds, one of these days I'm going to get in and burn an entire tank of gas or two while intentionally flying WITH the wind and see where the tailwinds take me.... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
max altitude and Mach 1 Now With Charts | John R Weiss | Military Aviation | 6 | May 15th 04 05:49 PM |
F-22 Comparison | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 39 | December 4th 03 04:25 PM |
WWII warplanes vs combat sim realism | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 37 | November 27th 03 05:24 AM |
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience | John Carrier | Military Aviation | 54 | October 12th 03 04:59 AM |
Me-262, NOT Bell X-1 Broke SB First | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 140 | October 10th 03 08:02 PM |