A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Settle a bet: Mach speeds



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 20th 04, 05:08 PM
OXMORON1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Walt wrote:
BTW, on the deck 760 mph is close to .1M (STP), so when
your car is showing 76 mph, you're buzzing along at about .1M. (For
interstate travel, 75 mph is 12.5 miles in 10 minutes . . . we just
completed about 6000 miles of driving where I used this sort of mental
T=D/R to predict ETAs thus boggling my better half. Same sort of calcs
can be used ina light plane such as C152 . . . 6gph = 1 gal in 10 min,
90KTS = 1.5 nm/min; 120(tailwind)=2 nm/min. As above, use the
calculator if things look tight. (If they do you've screwed up.)


Glad I am not the only one running continuous ETAS while cruising down the
Interstate :-) Drift gets to be a bitch though!
Habit! Ingrained by instructors who are really old farts now!

Rick Clark
MFE


  #2  
Old May 20th 04, 05:52 PM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(OXMORON1) wrote:
Walt wrote:


BTW, on the deck 760 mph is close to .1M (STP), so when
your car is showing 76 mph, you're buzzing along at about .1M. (For
interstate travel, 75 mph is 12.5 miles in 10 minutes . . . we just
completed about 6000 miles of driving where I used this sort of mental
T=D/R to predict ETAs thus boggling my better half. Same sort of calcs
can be used ina light plane such as C152 . . . 6gph = 1 gal in 10 min,
90KTS = 1.5 nm/min; 120(tailwind)=2 nm/min. As above, use the
calculator if things look tight. (If they do you've screwed up.)


Glad I am not the only one running continuous ETAS while cruising down the
Interstate :-) Drift gets to be a bitch though!
Habit! Ingrained by instructors who are really old farts now!


Speaking of winds and such, as an "old fart" flight instructor myself
(it's all downhill after 40, right?) here is a little homemade
question that I find many aviators both military and civil routinely
get wrong:

If you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph
headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and
fly back to airport "B" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS
will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had
made the flight in no-wind conditions?

Yea or nay?

(Correct answer gets a cigar and large bucket of his favorite
drink....)







  #3  
Old May 20th 04, 05:57 PM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Marron wrote:

Speaking of winds and such, as an "old fart" flight instructor myself
(it's all downhill after 40, right?) here is a little homemade
question that I find many aviators both military and civil routinely
get wrong:


If you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph
headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and
fly back to airport "B" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS
will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had
made the flight in no-wind conditions?


Yea or nay?


(Correct answer gets a cigar and large bucket of his favorite
drink....)



Oops!

The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to
airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS."

In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into
a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around
and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS
will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had
made the flight in no-wind conditions?



  #4  
Old May 20th 04, 06:14 PM
OXMORON1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike came back with:
Oops!

The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to
airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS."


Glad you made that correction, I was still orbiting "B"

Rick
  #5  
Old May 20th 04, 06:23 PM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(OXMORON1) wrote:

Mike came back with:
Oops!


The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to
airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS."


Glad you made that correction, I was still orbiting "B"


Heh. But now that you've flown back to "A" and landed, in order to
get the cigar and bucket of your fave drink you have to hazard an
answer to the question.

Rick


  #6  
Old May 20th 04, 09:49 PM
Al Gerharter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, you are exposed to the headwind for a longer time. Any wind from any
direction will increase your round trip time. Al (a very old flight
instructor)

"Mike Marron" wrote in message
...
Mike Marron wrote:


Speaking of winds and such, as an "old fart" flight instructor myself
(it's all downhill after 40, right?) here is a little homemade
question that I find many aviators both military and civil routinely
get wrong:


If you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into a 20 mph
headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around and
fly back to airport "B" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS
will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had
made the flight in no-wind conditions?


Yea or nay?


(Correct answer gets a cigar and large bucket of his favorite
drink....)



Oops!

The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to
airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS."

In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into
a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around
and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS
will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had
made the flight in no-wind conditions?





  #7  
Old May 21st 04, 02:22 PM
Jeff Crowell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Marron wrote:
Oops!

The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to
airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS."

In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into
a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around
and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS
will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had
made the flight in no-wind conditions?


Okay, I'll bite.

Looks like the no-wind solution is 4 hours, the headwind/tailwind
solution is 4.17 hours.

Just in case I win, I prefer Lagavulin 16. I'll skip the seegar.


Jeff


  #8  
Old May 21st 04, 03:14 PM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jeff Crowell" wrote:
Mike Marron wrote:


Oops!


The above question should read, "...turn around and fly back to
airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS."


In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into
a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around
and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS
will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had
made the flight in no-wind conditions?


Okay, I'll bite.


Looks like the no-wind solution is 4 hours, the headwind/tailwind
solution is 4.17 hours.


Just in case I win, I prefer Lagavulin 16. I'll skip the seegar.


Al Gerharter was the first to answer correctly, but disqualified
himself by admitting that he's an old hand instructor so it looks
like you won indeed. Congratulations! A large bucket of Lagavulin
16 is on the way...
  #9  
Old May 21st 04, 04:03 PM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


In other words, if you takeoff from airport "A" and fly 200 miles into
a 20 mph headwind to airport "B" at 100 mph (TAS) and then turn around
and fly back to airport "A" now with a 20 mph tailwind at the same TAS
will you complete the roundtrip flight in the same time as if you had
made the flight in no-wind conditions?


Okay, I'll bite.

Looks like the no-wind solution is 4 hours, the headwind/tailwind
solution is 4.17 hours.


Because you spend more time going against the wind and fighting it, than you
spend with the wind and benefitting from it, so thats why you lose time




Ron
Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4)
Silver City Tanker Base

  #10  
Old May 21st 04, 04:39 PM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Ron) wrote:

Because you spend more time going against the wind and fighting it, than you
spend with the wind and benefitting from it, so thats why you lose time


Amazing how many folks fail to grasp this concept.

Instead of forever battling headwinds, one of these days I'm going
to get in and burn an entire tank of gas or two while intentionally
flying WITH the wind and see where the tailwinds take me....











 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
max altitude and Mach 1 Now With Charts John R Weiss Military Aviation 6 May 15th 04 05:49 PM
F-22 Comparison robert arndt Military Aviation 39 December 4th 03 04:25 PM
WWII warplanes vs combat sim realism [email protected] Military Aviation 37 November 27th 03 05:24 AM
The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience John Carrier Military Aviation 54 October 12th 03 04:59 AM
Me-262, NOT Bell X-1 Broke SB First robert arndt Military Aviation 140 October 10th 03 08:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.