![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The F-101 produces enough thrust for Mach 1.2 to 1.25 and the shock is
stable somewhere in the inlet ducting. The F-119 should produce enough extra thrust to increase the max Mach significantly. Sure, the shock front moves aft as Mach increases and at some point the shock will reach the fan and bad things happen. F-16's & F-18's reach 1.6 (1.8?) Mach with fixed inlets. "Peter Kemp" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:42:25 GMT, "breyfogle" wrote: The F119 engines make sufficient thrust to allow high altitude supersonic cruise at a Mach somewhat less than Mach 2 while not requiring any significant change to the current fixed inlets. The tradeoff is a significant reduction in range. I thought the requirement for adjustable inlets was to avoid the supersonic shockwave impinging on the compressor and stalling the engine. If so, then the thrust of the F-119 isn't oging to help at all. Peter Kemp |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Settle a bet: Mach speeds | tscottme | Military Aviation | 27 | June 8th 04 11:16 AM |
| max altitude and Mach 1 Now With Charts | John R Weiss | Military Aviation | 6 | May 15th 04 06:49 PM |
| WWII warplanes vs combat sim realism | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 37 | November 27th 03 06:24 AM |
| US Coverup of Me-262 Mach Flight | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 48 | October 2nd 03 05:49 PM |
| need 2024 t3 5 foot by 12 foot .020 | groundloop | Home Built | 2 | August 22nd 03 05:29 PM |