![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Speaking of a possible hornet/f-11 sucessor, why didn't the RAAF
choose the Rafale instead? Currently the F.2 block of rafales seem to match the hornet and possibly the aardvark's strike capability plus i think dassualt really need some buyers for their jet |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Prowlus" wrote in message om... Speaking of a possible hornet/f-11 sucessor, why didn't the RAAF choose the Rafale instead? Currently the F.2 block of rafales seem to match the hornet and possibly the aardvark's strike capability plus i think dassualt really need some buyers for their jet Have they actually got the multi-role version in service, or even flying? Last i heard all they had were the air-to-air only naval variants. Brooks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Prowlus" wrote in message
om... Speaking of a possible hornet/f-11 sucessor, why didn't the RAAF choose the Rafale instead? Currently the F.2 block of rafales seem to match the hornet and possibly the aardvark's strike capability plus i think dassualt really need some buyers for their jet I think you just answered your own question. -- "The code of the warrior class has room for fallibility but there is no room for a lack of integrity." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canadian IFR/VFR Flight Plan | gwengler | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | August 11th 04 03:55 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
RAAF back up to 6 Wedgetails | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 0 | May 2nd 04 05:18 PM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |