A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FAA Eases ADS-B STC Requirement



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 19th 16, 11:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default FAA Eases ADS-B STC Requirement

The bottom line is for GA this is a nice improvement--especially for folks with certified aircraft not listed on an existing ADS-B AML STC. And overall it should help lower price installs though reduced paperwork/337 approvals. For certified gliders it is a small positive step, but maybe irrelevant to most glider owners, as it does not address TSO-C199/TABS devices. Nothing here affects experimental gliders.

Most glider owners are more likely to want to know about what is happening with transponder and ADS-B exemption status affecting gliders and possible use of TSO-C199/TABS devices as alternatives to full transponders and ADS-B Out devices. The ADS-B Out issue remains the cost of TSO-C145c (or similar) GPS sources. And again, you just cannot install any GPS and ADS-B out combination, even if the GPS is suitably TSO approved. You have to start with the ADS-B vendor and find out what GPS combinations they approve and can provide install/setup data for.

This change does hopefully imply the FAA would be willing to treat a TSO-C199/TABS system installation as a minor modification. But it is all idle speculation until some, any, regulations exist.....

On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 3:19:44 AM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 2:50:00 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"The installer does have to obtain permission from the original STC holder."

Does anyone else see that as a possible problem?


Unlikely, the FAA document provided is very clear.

Obtaining the original STC costs money so I wouldn't be surprised if the holder might be reticent about letting people use it for free.


Not likely an issue. In practice most of these ADS-B AML STCs were funded by the ADS-B manufactures and available free of charge for many GA type installs. Those vendors care about selling ADS-B hardware to a broader market not STC paperwork.

In practice an install shop would either use an STC or setup parameters published by the ADS-B hardware vendor for a ADS-B/GPS pairing. And vendors can now provide setup instructions that don't require AML STC paperwork.

As I understand it you need an STC for installing the unit in the aircraft and another STC to connect the ADS-B unit to the selected GPS source.


No. Any single ADS-B installation STC has always covered all that. The very core of any ADS-B AML STC is that it is the installation of ADS-B hardware with a paired specific GPS source.

The ADS-B in function of the PowerFlarm has already paid for itself in my glider though and I fly in Canada where ADS-B isn't even on track to become mandatory.


Not sure why you are worried about FAA approval issues then.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
91.205 compass requirement [email protected] Soaring 24 April 23rd 16 07:22 AM
Requirement of AW 139 pilot sanjay Rotorcraft 2 August 25th 08 10:06 AM
CFI logging requirement [email protected] Owning 9 October 19th 04 07:11 PM
Mode S to become requirement? Bob Chilcoat Owning 6 July 14th 04 11:25 PM
New Castle ELT Requirement Ed Byars Soaring 16 June 19th 04 06:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.