![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The bottom line is for GA this is a nice improvement--especially for folks with certified aircraft not listed on an existing ADS-B AML STC. And overall it should help lower price installs though reduced paperwork/337 approvals. For certified gliders it is a small positive step, but maybe irrelevant to most glider owners, as it does not address TSO-C199/TABS devices. Nothing here affects experimental gliders.
Most glider owners are more likely to want to know about what is happening with transponder and ADS-B exemption status affecting gliders and possible use of TSO-C199/TABS devices as alternatives to full transponders and ADS-B Out devices. The ADS-B Out issue remains the cost of TSO-C145c (or similar) GPS sources. And again, you just cannot install any GPS and ADS-B out combination, even if the GPS is suitably TSO approved. You have to start with the ADS-B vendor and find out what GPS combinations they approve and can provide install/setup data for. This change does hopefully imply the FAA would be willing to treat a TSO-C199/TABS system installation as a minor modification. But it is all idle speculation until some, any, regulations exist..... On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 3:19:44 AM UTC-7, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Thursday, May 19, 2016 at 2:50:00 AM UTC-7, wrote: "The installer does have to obtain permission from the original STC holder." Does anyone else see that as a possible problem? Unlikely, the FAA document provided is very clear. Obtaining the original STC costs money so I wouldn't be surprised if the holder might be reticent about letting people use it for free. Not likely an issue. In practice most of these ADS-B AML STCs were funded by the ADS-B manufactures and available free of charge for many GA type installs. Those vendors care about selling ADS-B hardware to a broader market not STC paperwork. In practice an install shop would either use an STC or setup parameters published by the ADS-B hardware vendor for a ADS-B/GPS pairing. And vendors can now provide setup instructions that don't require AML STC paperwork. As I understand it you need an STC for installing the unit in the aircraft and another STC to connect the ADS-B unit to the selected GPS source. No. Any single ADS-B installation STC has always covered all that. The very core of any ADS-B AML STC is that it is the installation of ADS-B hardware with a paired specific GPS source. The ADS-B in function of the PowerFlarm has already paid for itself in my glider though and I fly in Canada where ADS-B isn't even on track to become mandatory. Not sure why you are worried about FAA approval issues then. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
91.205 compass requirement | [email protected] | Soaring | 24 | April 23rd 16 07:22 AM |
Requirement of AW 139 pilot | sanjay | Rotorcraft | 2 | August 25th 08 10:06 AM |
CFI logging requirement | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | October 19th 04 07:11 PM |
Mode S to become requirement? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 6 | July 14th 04 11:25 PM |
New Castle ELT Requirement | Ed Byars | Soaring | 16 | June 19th 04 06:15 PM |