![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Darrell" wrote in message news:FAjBc.20218$ey.9317@fed1read06... The B-47 had neutral aileron control at about 425 knots (as I seem to remember). Above that speed it rolled in the opposite direction than the control input. It was because of the flexible wing. Approaching 425 (if that's the right speed), the roll produced by aileron input reduced to no roll at all at 425, then it would roll opposite the control input above 425. It was, as you noted, because, above 425, the aileron served merely as a tab which ended up twisting the overall wing in the opposite control direction. I believe that the B-47 aileron control characteristics you mention are close to the facts, and I recall that the "red-line" speed vs roll control, was handled in a rather unusual manner. During the late 1950's, some B-47 units were tasked to fly low level "LABS" missions. At some speed near the "red-line" (it could have been 425, it was long ago!), the wing twist would cause one wing or the other to become increasingly "heavy", and increased roll trim would have to be cranked in to maintain level flight. Each aircraft was slightly different than others, so an aileron rerigging program was begun, to rerig all ships ailerons to near perfection and then test fly each one to determine how much aileron trim was required to maintain level flight at some speed (I thought it was higher than 425, but hey, that was in maybe 1958 or so). Then, if more than 20 (?) units of trim were required, the aileron of the "heavy" wing was carefully rerigged a couple of degrees below neutral, and the test flight was repeated. This process went on until all the 303rd Bomb Wing ships except one met the new criteria. The one that did not respond got a meticulous (sp?) alignment check, and one wing was found to have a permanent twist, exceeding the -3 structural manual's service limits. Deep down in the procurement documents it was found that that particular ship's right wing was out of lim its when accepted by the AFPRO from Boeing. Old Chief Lynn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | March 2nd 04 08:48 PM |
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:20 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In | Zeno | Aerobatics | 0 | August 2nd 03 07:31 PM |
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt": An Awesome WWII DoubleFeature at Zeno's Drive-In | zeno | Military Aviation | 0 | July 14th 03 07:31 PM |