A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Control Reversal in WWII



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 21st 04, 04:40 PM
Lynn Coffelt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Darrell" wrote in message
news:FAjBc.20218$ey.9317@fed1read06...
The B-47 had neutral aileron control at about 425 knots (as I seem to
remember). Above that speed it rolled in the opposite direction than the
control input. It was because of the flexible wing. Approaching 425 (if
that's the right speed), the roll produced by aileron input reduced to no
roll at all at 425, then it would roll opposite the control input above

425.
It was, as you noted, because, above 425, the aileron served merely as a

tab
which ended up twisting the overall wing in the opposite control

direction.

I believe that the B-47 aileron control characteristics you mention are
close to the facts, and I recall that the "red-line" speed vs roll control,
was handled in a rather unusual manner.

During the late 1950's, some B-47 units were tasked to fly low level
"LABS" missions. At some speed near the "red-line" (it could have been 425,
it was long ago!), the wing twist would cause one wing or the other to
become increasingly "heavy", and increased roll trim would have to be
cranked in to maintain level flight. Each aircraft was slightly different
than others, so an aileron rerigging program was begun, to rerig all ships
ailerons to near perfection and then test fly each one to determine how much
aileron trim was required to maintain level flight at some speed (I thought
it was higher than 425, but hey, that was in maybe 1958 or so). Then, if
more than 20 (?) units of trim were required, the aileron of the "heavy"
wing was carefully rerigged a couple of degrees below neutral, and the test
flight was repeated.

This process went on until all the 303rd Bomb Wing ships except one met
the new criteria. The one that did not respond got a meticulous (sp?)
alignment check, and one wing was found to have a permanent twist, exceeding
the -3 structural manual's service limits. Deep down in the procurement
documents it was found that that particular ship's right wing was out of lim
its when accepted by the AFPRO from Boeing.

Old Chief Lynn


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead ArtKramr Military Aviation 0 March 2nd 04 08:48 PM
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 22nd 04 02:20 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt" WWII Double Feature at Zeno'sDrive-In Zeno Aerobatics 0 August 2nd 03 07:31 PM
"Target for Today" & "Thunderbolt": An Awesome WWII DoubleFeature at Zeno's Drive-In zeno Military Aviation 0 July 14th 03 07:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.