![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Ferrin" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:12:58 -0500, "John Carrier" wrote: The F-18 and particularly the F-18E/F has significantly better high alpha capability than the F-14. I'd read that in flight testing the Tomcat they flew at 60 and even 90 degrees AOA and that the AOA limitations were mainly due to the crappy TF30. Are the B&D any better or is it indeed an airframe limitation? The F-14 has great pitch rate (more or less equal to the F-18). But it will take that big bite and then stop flying, it can't sustain the very high alpha. There's video somewhere of the test program in which they take the aircraft to somewhere near 90 degrees alpha, but it's momentary and they really couldn't do much with it after the pitch pulse except recover. You could enter a split S in the F-14 at 300 knots in full a/b and slap the stick into your lap. The airplane would give you about 90 degrees of pitch almost instantly, the airspeed would decelerate to about 120 knots just as quickly. Then you had to unstall the tails to pull through the rest of the maneuver ... it wasn't at anywhere near 90 degrees alpha (maybe 25 or so? AOA gauges are calibrated in units which rarely reflect true alpha in degrees). While the TF-30 engines were pretty poor, it was not a function of honoring their limitations. Purely a matter of aerodynamics. R / John |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 06:23:46 -0500, "John Carrier"
wrote: "Scott Ferrin" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 17:12:58 -0500, "John Carrier" wrote: The F-18 and particularly the F-18E/F has significantly better high alpha capability than the F-14. I'd read that in flight testing the Tomcat they flew at 60 and even 90 degrees AOA and that the AOA limitations were mainly due to the crappy TF30. Are the B&D any better or is it indeed an airframe limitation? The F-14 has great pitch rate (more or less equal to the F-18). But it will take that big bite and then stop flying, it can't sustain the very high alpha. There's video somewhere of the test program in which they take the aircraft to somewhere near 90 degrees alpha, but it's momentary and they really couldn't do much with it after the pitch pulse except recover. You could enter a split S in the F-14 at 300 knots in full a/b and slap the stick into your lap. The airplane would give you about 90 degrees of pitch almost instantly, the airspeed would decelerate to about 120 knots just as quickly. Then you had to unstall the tails to pull through the rest of the maneuver ... it wasn't at anywhere near 90 degrees alpha (maybe 25 or so? AOA gauges are calibrated in units which rarely reflect true alpha in degrees). While the TF-30 engines were pretty poor, it was not a function of honoring their limitations. Purely a matter of aerodynamics. R / John Thanks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|