![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 8:44:24 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote:
While studying for my Flight Engineer license back in the 70s (do they have Flight Engineers any more?), it was explained that the max weight of non lifting components had to do with the strength (bending moments) of the wing spar.Â* Help us out here, Steve L. MTOW has, I believe, to do with landing gear, brakes, tires, etc. Think MV**2 during an aborted takeoff.Â* Higher weight - higher takeoff speed - WAY higher energy to dissipate, that V squared component. Dan, No more flight engineers. You have to go back to 727s or early 747s to find a Flight engineer panel and all of those have been retired in this country years ago. MTOW is based on 5 different Performance charts (4 of which are based on engine out performance). MLW is based on Landing Gear and brake energy. Zero Fuel Weight is based on bending moment just like you said. I checked with the factory on my glider and yes, Non Lifting is just like Max Zero Fuel WT is on a jet. Everything beyond this must be wing ballast. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The weight of the wings should not change much from the factory weight
until repairs or refinishing. In the fuselage, instruments, batteries, O2 system, pilot, chute, documents,, tie down kit, lunch and drinks need to be included. It all adds up. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Northwest Airlines hated it when they got ride of the flight engineer, less people to play drinking games with all night before flight.
On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 11:55:47 AM UTC-8, K m wrote: On Thursday, November 30, 2017 at 8:44:24 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote: While studying for my Flight Engineer license back in the 70s (do they have Flight Engineers any more?), it was explained that the max weight of non lifting components had to do with the strength (bending moments) of the wing spar.Â* Help us out here, Steve L. MTOW has, I believe, to do with landing gear, brakes, tires, etc. Think MV**2 during an aborted takeoff.Â* Higher weight - higher takeoff speed - WAY higher energy to dissipate, that V squared component. Dan, No more flight engineers. You have to go back to 727s or early 747s to find a Flight engineer panel and all of those have been retired in this country years ago. MTOW is based on 5 different Performance charts (4 of which are based on engine out performance). MLW is based on Landing Gear and brake energy. Zero Fuel Weight is based on bending moment just like you said. I checked with the factory on my glider and yes, Non Lifting is just like Max Zero Fuel WT is on a jet. Everything beyond this must be wing ballast. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fiberglass cloth weight vs 'finished' weight | Fred the Red Shirt | Home Built | 12 | April 5th 08 04:24 PM |
Glider Weight/Wing Loading and determing speed for best L/D for a given weight | 65E | Soaring | 3 | January 26th 06 09:26 PM |
How much weight will 15 ft.³ of helium lift? | John Doe | Home Built | 1 | December 3rd 04 04:07 PM |
Crosswind components | James L. Freeman | Piloting | 25 | February 29th 04 01:21 AM |
Empty/Gross weight Vs. Max. Pilot weight | Flyhighdave | Soaring | 13 | January 14th 04 04:20 AM |