A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 15th 04, 01:21 AM
Eunometic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"ian maclure" wrote in message ...
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:42:31 +0000, WalterM140 wrote:

[snip]

Hitler largely refused to allow German night fighters to
operate over England.
This was one of his misguided "brain waves"; he also didn't see the point of
shooting down bombers where the people couldn't see them. The few times
this happened any way, the Germans had good succcess.


It doesn't seem irrational to me. Protecting the secrets of German
electronics equipement would seem to be a key priority. The Germans
used various techniques: multiple frequencies, special modulation
schemes (chirping) to improve resisetence to jamming.



Operating intruders over Britain as night fighters would be
a good way to lose a lot of them. Mosquitoes and other high
performance aircraft vectored by radar would have shredded
them.


German nightfighters if equiped with tail warning radar eg those with
the SN2R or variants of the Neptune tail warning radar generally did
very well at avoiding Mosquito interception. For instance Ju 88 with
SN2R outperformed the He 219 which was much faster but had only the
SN2.

The problem the Germans had in combat was that the range of the German
radars was limited to the altitude of the aircraft since the beam was
very broad. (this also picking up the ground, jamming and
window/chaff) while the Allied aircraft could play the deadly game
down to the ground. The situation was changing from Feburary 1945
with the introduction of the FuG 244 microwave radars into Ju88 G7
series aircraft for troop testing.




IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

  #2  
Old July 15th 04, 05:00 AM
Krztalizer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The problem the Germans had in combat was that the range of the German
radars was limited to the altitude of the aircraft since the beam was
very broad.


Not true - that was a limitation, but Nachtjägers didn't see AI in the same way
as Allied NF, so that limitation wasn't viewed as an Achilles Heal, more of an
annoyance.

They considered AI to be an arrow in the quiver, not their primary search tool.
US and RAF crews reporting a "bent gadget" turned around and went home; German
crews just turned it off and continued on their mission.

v/r
Gordon
====(A+C====
USN SAR

Its always better to lose -an- engine, not -the- engine.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
regaining night currency but not alone Teacherjh Instrument Flight Rules 11 May 28th 04 02:08 PM
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 111 May 4th 04 05:34 PM
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 Jukka O. Kauppinen Military Aviation 4 March 22nd 04 11:19 PM
Why did Britain win the BoB? Grantland Military Aviation 79 October 15th 03 03:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.