![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Forrest
You need to go to the KR group site and ask your questions there. I don't have the address to get there but you can look via google and/or someone here will give to you. When you start talking to people who are flying the different models and the mods that have been made you will have a better feeling for what you have and what you need. I have a rip off copy or the early KR plans my friend gave me to help him with some of his problems building but that was 20-30 or so years ago and doubt if they are still available in my stacks of junk. Since they are shop plans/drawings and not complete , I wouldn't give to anyone. I think they still sell plans and you may want to get a set so you will know how bird is constructed and how to inspect and be able to confirm that all the parts are built correctly and all put together correctly. Remember its your life. You didn't say how experienced you are. Don't think the bird is the best for a low time pilot? You need to trace your bird back and find out who built and get their plans assuming they have a set of legal ones? Have read that some had a problem with the retracting gear. Originally was kind of mickey mouse. Get an old time KR2 pilot as a Guru. Don't let my negativism turn you off. Just do your home work and fly safe. Big John On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 15:40:47 GMT, "Forrest" wrote: Stealth Pilot Well, alrightie then. Weight and balance. And 'geared for day is ok'. It's funny that this isn't the first time I've been told that I'm trying to expand a humming bird project into a big fat duck. Good point. Actually, even though only the cabin wall frame is completed, I was in the process of building a 25% enlargement of the "Marvin Barnard M-19" (kind of a fiberglass version of a Cub) when the KR2 came up. But the thing is that I don't know enough about that machine's load capabilities either. Seems like some education is in order. The point is to get into the air. I do like the idea of a second airplane. Four passengers is what I'm really after. See what happens when you give a kid a piece of paper and say "make a list for Santa". Oop! Time to go to work. Thank you, Forrest "Stealth Pilot" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:09:52 GMT, "Forrest" wrote: The following is an email I sent to Jim Weir of KitPlanes Magazine. Jim requested that I post my message to this newsgroup and and open these issues up for discussion. I'm the new guy to aviation. Forrest having read your wish list you need two aeroplanes (seriously!) one in basic day vfr fitout that you can make the commutes over to see your mum in (this is the real aeroplane) the other a project that you can dream about, fit all the toys into and satisfy your creative urges with. (this is the unfinished project aeroplane) I'm familiar with the KR2. a friend is rebuilding his after pranging it. they suit a small light pilot (5ft nothing, jockey build) and dont have capacity for too much instrumentation without going overweight and having dog like performance. the engine will cause you problems. the continental will cause you weight problems. target engine was an 1850cc or 2150cc VW aero conversion. cruise is about 140 knots on these. a jabiru 2200cc engine would be good. I fly a day vfr tailwind and I have commuted to mom's in it on a number of occasions. my commute is 1500 nautical miles each way. I havent needed anything more than the instruments I have and I wouldnt want any less. the tailwind is fitted with: airspeed indicator slip indicator sensitive altimeter tacho artificial horizon. oil temp oil pressure vacuum gauge. fuel gauge garmin gps 2 plus. wrist watch on my wrist. magnetic compass. anything beyond that is really just dead weight. I use everything that is there. the A/H has got me out of the guano on three weather occasions, however for most situations it is merely an angle of bank indicator. I wouldnt be without it. my practical suggestion for your KR2 is as follows. find out the design empty weight of the aircraft. weigh the actual aircraft as it sits. work out what you have to do to achieve the design empty weight in your finished aircraft. if you cant achieve it then dont bull**** to yourself. that isnt the aircraft you should be building. look for something more practical/more suited. dont embark on a projest that will see the first flight occurring after your mum isnt here. stick with something simple and practical for the real aircraft and build a second whizbang project. Stealth Pilot (no transponder) Australia |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Further advice to Forrest:
As of two years ago, they were still selling plans and the price was very reasonable. At that time, their address was: Rand Robinson Engineering, Inc. 15641 Product Lane, Suite A5 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Phone: (714) 898-3811 and their (then new) web address was: http://www.fly-kr.com/ Remember that the KR is a very small airplane and that Ken Rand was only a little bigger than the Wright brothers. If I recall correctly, Ken Rand was around 5'6" and 125 to 130 pounds. If you are much taller than 5'7", the rounded canopy and turtle deck will not give you adequate headroom. In addition, shoulder width will be a problem if you are much larger, or even if you are broad shouldered at 5'7" or so... I am 6'1" and currently 200 pounds (which I regard as 20 pounds over weight) and bought my set of plans mainly as a curiosity; and as one more example of prior engineering with a known result. As I recall it, Ken Rand's KR-2 originally flew with a 1600 cc VW engine, cruised at roughly 115 knots, and only required that the cooling intakes be opened slightly to operate reliably and maintain the desired temperatures. I have tried a KR-2 on for size and it did not fit. At the minimum, I would require a molded, rather than blown, canopy (with appropriate changes to the turtle deck) and about 4 inches more cabin width. In addition, I would need a useful load of at least 500 pounds, rather than the stated 420 pounds. It would also need more wing area. Finally more structure would increase the empty weight. When it is all added up, the gross weight would probably increase about 150 pounds (to 1150 pounds), the wing area would need to increase to about 90 square feet, and the engine would need to be a Rotax 912, a Jabiru 2200, or possibly a Corvair. In short it would no longer be a KR-2; instead it would be the PS-1 or Pete's Special, a "custom built". (I really like the KR, but the Doc said he couldn't safely remove a couple of vertebrae so that I could close the canopy) A final note of caution. Forrest should be really careful about too much sanding! Especially, be careful about sanding the leading edges and skin attachment areas such as near the spar caps! Some years ago, a 5/8 scale FW-190A self destructed on the way home from OSH. IIRC, the builder had done a lot of surface work to achieve a near perfect contour and grand champion finish; and a leading edge split while in flight ... :-( Peter Big John wrote: Forrest You need to go to the KR group site and ask your questions there. I don't have the address to get there but you can look via google and/or someone here will give to you. When you start talking to people who are flying the different models and the mods that have been made you will have a better feeling for what you have and what you need. I have a rip off copy or the early KR plans my friend gave me to help him with some of his problems building but that was 20-30 or so years ago and doubt if they are still available in my stacks of junk. Since they are shop plans/drawings and not complete , I wouldn't give to anyone. I think they still sell plans and you may want to get a set so you will know how bird is constructed and how to inspect and be able to confirm that all the parts are built correctly and all put together correctly. Remember its your life. You didn't say how experienced you are. Don't think the bird is the best for a low time pilot? You need to trace your bird back and find out who built and get their plans assuming they have a set of legal ones? Have read that some had a problem with the retracting gear. Originally was kind of mickey mouse. Get an old time KR2 pilot as a Guru. Don't let my negativism turn you off. Just do your home work and fly safe. Big John On Sun, 07 Dec 2003 15:40:47 GMT, "Forrest" wrote: Stealth Pilot Well, alrightie then. Weight and balance. And 'geared for day is ok'. It's funny that this isn't the first time I've been told that I'm trying to expand a humming bird project into a big fat duck. Good point. Actually, even though only the cabin wall frame is completed, I was in the process of building a 25% enlargement of the "Marvin Barnard M-19" (kind of a fiberglass version of a Cub) when the KR2 came up. But the thing is that I don't know enough about that machine's load capabilities either. Seems like some education is in order. The point is to get into the air. I do like the idea of a second airplane. Four passengers is what I'm really after. See what happens when you give a kid a piece of paper and say "make a list for Santa". Oop! Time to go to work. Thank you, Forrest "Stealth Pilot" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 20:09:52 GMT, "Forrest" wrote: The following is an email I sent to Jim Weir of KitPlanes Magazine. Jim requested that I post my message to this newsgroup and and open these issues up for discussion. I'm the new guy to aviation. Forrest having read your wish list you need two aeroplanes (seriously!) one in basic day vfr fitout that you can make the commutes over to see your mum in (this is the real aeroplane) the other a project that you can dream about, fit all the toys into and satisfy your creative urges with. (this is the unfinished project aeroplane) I'm familiar with the KR2. a friend is rebuilding his after pranging it. they suit a small light pilot (5ft nothing, jockey build) and dont have capacity for too much instrumentation without going overweight and having dog like performance. the engine will cause you problems. the continental will cause you weight problems. target engine was an 1850cc or 2150cc VW aero conversion. cruise is about 140 knots on these. a jabiru 2200cc engine would be good. I fly a day vfr tailwind and I have commuted to mom's in it on a number of occasions. my commute is 1500 nautical miles each way. I havent needed anything more than the instruments I have and I wouldnt want any less. the tailwind is fitted with: airspeed indicator slip indicator sensitive altimeter tacho artificial horizon. oil temp oil pressure vacuum gauge. fuel gauge garmin gps 2 plus. wrist watch on my wrist. magnetic compass. anything beyond that is really just dead weight. I use everything that is there. the A/H has got me out of the guano on three weather occasions, however for most situations it is merely an angle of bank indicator. I wouldnt be without it. my practical suggestion for your KR2 is as follows. find out the design empty weight of the aircraft. weigh the actual aircraft as it sits. work out what you have to do to achieve the design empty weight in your finished aircraft. if you cant achieve it then dont bull**** to yourself. that isnt the aircraft you should be building. look for something more practical/more suited. dont embark on a projest that will see the first flight occurring after your mum isnt here. stick with something simple and practical for the real aircraft and build a second whizbang project. Stealth Pilot (no transponder) Australia |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|