![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most compensation probes are designed to function with an angle of 70°, not 90° (but some do), between the prong and the airflow. Whatever you do, that angle will change whenever you increase or reduce your airspeed, so the system must have some built-in flexibility. How much flexibility and in what direction (up or down) will probably depend on the design of the probe. So follow the instructions of the manufacturer, would be my advice. ESA Systems says prong up, so that's it for me.
There are two-pronged probes that should be placed with the prongs horizontal. https://www.esa-systems.com/en/produ...e-dnst-840-mm/ https://www.esa-systems.com/en/produ...robe-dnstatek/ According to a German study, this type gives the best compensation results. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Prandtl multi probe receptacle used for TE only? | Matt Herron Jr. | Soaring | 12 | February 15th 18 08:32 PM |
Proper Std. Cirrus class | Jacopo Romei | Soaring | 4 | January 9th 17 07:57 PM |
I will be insert usenet | Mark | Piloting | 2 | October 10th 10 12:32 PM |
Multi - probe | KP | Soaring | 1 | March 7th 05 06:03 PM |