![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone have any experience, knowledge or opinion on the headwind penetration capabilities of the Mini-LAK without the FES. The manufacture advertises a 45/1 L/D with very light 13.5 meter wings. Appreciate any feedback. Thanks.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, February 18, 2018 at 11:25:19 AM UTC+11, wrote:
Does anyone have any experience, knowledge or opinion on the headwind penetration capabilities of the Mini-LAK without the FES. The manufacture advertises a 45/1 L/D with very light 13.5 meter wings. Appreciate any feedback. Thanks. I believe the polar is available on the brochure. TAS - HEAD-WING equals ground speed, same as any other glider. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sunnuntai 18. helmikuuta 2018 2.25.19 UTC+2 kirjoitti:
Does anyone have any experience, knowledge or opinion on the headwind penetration capabilities of the Mini-LAK without the FES. The manufacture advertises a 45/1 L/D with very light 13.5 meter wings. Appreciate any feedback. Thanks. 45/1? The best 15m gliders can barely touch that figure (talking about real world, not brochures), taking 10% off span does not exactly help. Germans have given MiniLAK same handicap as LS4, which does not contradict things I have heard about performance. But why would anyone fly this wihtout FES? At 35 kg/m2 wingloading "penetration capability" is about same as with paper bag. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A mini LAK with FES will be flying quite a bit higher than 35 kg/m^2. In Hungary all the Mini LAKS flew without FES and we're at the (silly) 35 kg/m^2 limit.
Check out the flight traces for the first day of the 2nd 13.5m WGC. the first turnpoint was directly in to the wind probably about 75km. Wind was at least 20 knots. The Mini LAKs made it. Thise of us in Silents did not. There was another similar day about Day 8 or so, where the task was a double out and return along a strong NW wind. You can evaluate from the traces how the MiniLAKs handled it. I couldn't write make the last turnpoint into the wind and had to use the motor before the downwind run home. My assessment from actual (brief) side by side in flight experience is that the miniLAK can work into the wind just fine. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, February 17, 2018 at 11:24:06 PM UTC-8, krasw wrote:
sunnuntai 18. helmikuuta 2018 2.25.19 UTC+2 kirjoitti: Does anyone have any experience, knowledge or opinion on the headwind penetration capabilities of the Mini-LAK without the FES. The manufacture advertises a 45/1 L/D with very light 13.5 meter wings. Appreciate any feedback. Thanks. 45/1? The best 15m gliders can barely touch that figure (talking about real world, not brochures), taking 10% off span does not exactly help. Germans have given MiniLAK same handicap as LS4, which does not contradict things I have heard about performance. But why would anyone fly this wihtout FES? At 35 kg/m2 wingloading "penetration capability" is about same as with paper bag. It doesn't seem right at first, but when you look at the ship it's not a 15m ship with the wings clipped to 13.5, it's a 90% scale model of one! ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lx mini map | Dave Wallis | Soaring | 5 | February 26th 12 01:25 PM |
mini-map | Gaetan Trudel | Soaring | 4 | November 22nd 10 04:40 PM |
Mini-Imp | Curt Fennell | Home Built | 7 | November 10th 09 12:43 PM |
Mini-500 Sim | Jim | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | January 26th 04 11:32 PM |
Mini Imp | Randall Robertson | Home Built | 0 | November 25th 03 12:17 AM |