![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denyav" wrote in message ... Yes, wasnt it rather funny how trying to jam signals is just a big homing beacon too? They figured quite quickly how to make a weapon to home right on in that jamming signal. Those "jammers" were eliminated rather quickly. I doubt it,how could thousands of low cost jammers be eliminated quickly? Even if they could be eliminated eventually cost benefit outcome of a such operation would not be very favorable. Such jammers cost less than one Grand and Iraqis had only 6 or 7 of them,thanks to international embargo. So its not very hard to imagine what whould happen if they had 6000-7000 instead of 6 or 7. Isn't it true that the "jammers" they found in Iraq, were only good for small area jamming? By the time the weapon got within that area, it was probably too late to prevent it hitting its target due to ballistics etc? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Pentagon admits Environment source for future wars | Aerophotos | Military Aviation | 5 | February 23rd 04 01:33 PM |