A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Good lubricant for assembly



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 29th 18, 10:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default Good lubricant for assembly

On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 1:03:41 PM UTC-7, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
Agreed.
Vaseline is better than dry or old lube.
Cheap and easy to get.
Easy to use.

If assembling for a season, maybe something better.
Keep in mind, very limited movement so lube quality is less of an issue.
Yes, some may say the "wings will fall off" if you use the wrong lube. In this case, not likely.


I can't agree with the "anything" specification. The main pins do not move, but the lift and drag pins clearly do work in flight, with considerable pressure on them. Any glider a few years old will show signs of wear, galling, or Brinelling on those pins. From this is seems to me that something with some extreme pressure ingredients is desirable.
  #2  
Old May 30th 18, 12:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,383
Default Good lubricant for assembly

Oh, I don't disagree, trust me with my mechanical background.
Dry is among the worst case, crappy lube is better than nothing.

While we strive to be in the "perfect world", Vaseline is way better than nothing.

Not everyone wants to spend "x" dollars on lube, just like some peeps try to do a season with one set of wing tapes to the fuselage.

I am not here to judge, just saying Vaseline is way better than nothing.

I have been chastised when pulling wing tape and balling it up.
I just "wasted" a seasons worth of tape....shame on me......
Thus I use Scotch type 33 white electrical tape. Not a killer on price and easy to get.
  #3  
Old May 30th 18, 08:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Senna Van den Bosch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 124
Default Good lubricant for assembly

Op woensdag 30 mei 2018 01:56:52 UTC+2 schreef Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot):
Oh, I don't disagree, trust me with my mechanical background.
Dry is among the worst case, crappy lube is better than nothing.

While we strive to be in the "perfect world", Vaseline is way better than nothing.

Not everyone wants to spend "x" dollars on lube, just like some peeps try to do a season with one set of wing tapes to the fuselage.

I am not here to judge, just saying Vaseline is way better than nothing.

I have been chastised when pulling wing tape and balling it up.
I just "wasted" a seasons worth of tape....shame on me......
Thus I use Scotch type 33 white electrical tape. Not a killer on price and easy to get.


I just ordered a small pot of ball bearing grease which Dan Daly suggested to try out, as I used up all my vaseline. I just need them for the main pins to assemble the wings on my DG 101.

I might take a look at Amazon next, when I've tried this one.
  #4  
Old May 30th 18, 01:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Craig Funston[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Good lubricant for assembly

On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 2:39:59 PM UTC-7, jfitch wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 1:03:41 PM UTC-7, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
Agreed.
Vaseline is better than dry or old lube.
Cheap and easy to get.
Easy to use.

If assembling for a season, maybe something better.
Keep in mind, very limited movement so lube quality is less of an issue..
Yes, some may say the "wings will fall off" if you use the wrong lube. In this case, not likely.


I can't agree with the "anything" specification. The main pins do not move, but the lift and drag pins clearly do work in flight, with considerable pressure on them. Any glider a few years old will show signs of wear, galling, or Brinelling on those pins. From this is seems to me that something with some extreme pressure ingredients is desirable.


My observations as well regarding wear. After replacing a set of lift pins I switched away from "Superlube" to a lithium based grease designed for high bearing pressures.

Craig
  #5  
Old May 30th 18, 06:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Papa3[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 753
Default Good lubricant for assembly

Hey Craig,

For what it's worth... Superlube with PTFE (the one in the tube many of us use) is NLGI rated GC-LB. Per the NLGI folks: "Grease packaging may display the code GC-LB, meaning that it meets the most demanding test standards for both chassis and wheel bearings. Grease products displaying this highest rating meet OEM requirements." Among other comments, it says "Wide temperature grease for use in components such as bearings, chassis and universal joints in passenger cars, trucks, and other vehicles under mild and severe duty.This includes vehicles operated under frequent stop-and-go service (buses, taxis, urban police cars, etc.), or under severe braking service (trailer towing, heavy loading, mountain driving, etc.) (see ASTM D4950)."

Just curious what the specs of the other grease you are using meets. Not doubting you, just looking for data.

P3
  #6  
Old May 30th 18, 11:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Craig Funston[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Good lubricant for assembly

On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 10:32:54 AM UTC-7, Papa3 wrote:
Hey Craig,

For what it's worth... Superlube with PTFE (the one in the tube many of us use) is NLGI rated GC-LB. Per the NLGI folks: "Grease packaging may display the code GC-LB, meaning that it meets the most demanding test standards for both chassis and wheel bearings. Grease products displaying this highest rating meet OEM requirements." Among other comments, it says "Wide temperature grease for use in components such as bearings, chassis and universal joints in passenger cars, trucks, and other vehicles under mild and severe duty.This includes vehicles operated under frequent stop-and-go service (buses, taxis, urban police cars, etc.), or under severe braking service (trailer towing, heavy loading, mountain driving, etc.) (see ASTM D4950)."

Just curious what the specs of the other grease you are using meets. Not doubting you, just looking for data.

P3


HI Eric,

I just switched to Lucas "Red 'n' Tacky". It has the same NLGI GC-LB rating.. I hadn't seen anything in the Superlube literature that talked about extreme pressure suitability. It's entirely possible I missed that.

https://lucasoil.com/products/grease/red-n-tacky-grease

Craig
7Q
  #7  
Old May 30th 18, 11:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Craig Funston[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Good lubricant for assembly

On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-7, Craig Funston wrote:
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 10:32:54 AM UTC-7, Papa3 wrote:
Hey Craig,

For what it's worth... Superlube with PTFE (the one in the tube many of us use) is NLGI rated GC-LB. Per the NLGI folks: "Grease packaging may display the code GC-LB, meaning that it meets the most demanding test standards for both chassis and wheel bearings. Grease products displaying this highest rating meet OEM requirements." Among other comments, it says "Wide temperature grease for use in components such as bearings, chassis and universal joints in passenger cars, trucks, and other vehicles under mild and severe duty.This includes vehicles operated under frequent stop-and-go service (buses, taxis, urban police cars, etc.), or under severe braking service (trailer towing, heavy loading, mountain driving, etc.) (see ASTM D4950)."

Just curious what the specs of the other grease you are using meets. Not doubting you, just looking for data.

P3


HI Eric,

I just switched to Lucas "Red 'n' Tacky". It has the same NLGI GC-LB rating. I hadn't seen anything in the Superlube literature that talked about extreme pressure suitability. It's entirely possible I missed that.

https://lucasoil.com/products/grease/red-n-tacky-grease

Craig
7Q


Eric,

30 seconds of googling produced a spec sheet for an extreme pressure version of Superlube. http://www.super-lube.com/tech-data-...re-ezp-92.html

Craig
  #8  
Old May 31st 18, 01:21 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tom BravoMike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 266
Default Good lubricant for assembly

On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 5:33:13 PM UTC-5, Craig Funston wrote:
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-7, Craig Funston wrote:
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 10:32:54 AM UTC-7, Papa3 wrote:
Hey Craig,

For what it's worth... Superlube with PTFE (the one in the tube many of us use) is NLGI rated GC-LB. Per the NLGI folks: "Grease packaging may display the code GC-LB, meaning that it meets the most demanding test standards for both chassis and wheel bearings. Grease products displaying this highest rating meet OEM requirements." Among other comments, it says "Wide temperature grease for use in components such as bearings, chassis and universal joints in passenger cars, trucks, and other vehicles under mild and severe duty.This includes vehicles operated under frequent stop-and-go service (buses, taxis, urban police cars, etc.), or under severe braking service (trailer towing, heavy loading, mountain driving, etc.) (see ASTM D4950)."

Just curious what the specs of the other grease you are using meets. Not doubting you, just looking for data.

P3


HI Eric,

I just switched to Lucas "Red 'n' Tacky". It has the same NLGI GC-LB rating. I hadn't seen anything in the Superlube literature that talked about extreme pressure suitability. It's entirely possible I missed that.

https://lucasoil.com/products/grease/red-n-tacky-grease

Craig
7Q


Eric,

30 seconds of googling produced a spec sheet for an extreme pressure version of Superlube. http://www.super-lube.com/tech-data-...re-ezp-92.html

Craig


It's even "Kosher Certified" - WOW! That has finally convinced me.
  #9  
Old June 1st 18, 01:13 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Craig Funston[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 129
Default Good lubricant for assembly

On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 3:33:13 PM UTC-7, Craig Funston wrote:
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 3:04:53 PM UTC-7, Craig Funston wrote:
On Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 10:32:54 AM UTC-7, Papa3 wrote:
Hey Craig,

For what it's worth... Superlube with PTFE (the one in the tube many of us use) is NLGI rated GC-LB. Per the NLGI folks: "Grease packaging may display the code GC-LB, meaning that it meets the most demanding test standards for both chassis and wheel bearings. Grease products displaying this highest rating meet OEM requirements." Among other comments, it says "Wide temperature grease for use in components such as bearings, chassis and universal joints in passenger cars, trucks, and other vehicles under mild and severe duty.This includes vehicles operated under frequent stop-and-go service (buses, taxis, urban police cars, etc.), or under severe braking service (trailer towing, heavy loading, mountain driving, etc.) (see ASTM D4950)."

Just curious what the specs of the other grease you are using meets. Not doubting you, just looking for data.

P3


HI Eric,

I just switched to Lucas "Red 'n' Tacky". It has the same NLGI GC-LB rating. I hadn't seen anything in the Superlube literature that talked about extreme pressure suitability. It's entirely possible I missed that.

https://lucasoil.com/products/grease/red-n-tacky-grease

Craig
7Q


Eric,

30 seconds of googling produced a spec sheet for an extreme pressure version of Superlube. http://www.super-lube.com/tech-data-...re-ezp-92.html

Craig


Of note: The Lucas "Red 'n' Tacky" has a Timken OK load rating of 60 lb whereas the Superlube has a lower rating of 40 lb.

My observations are that this type of high pressure sliding capacity along with corrosion resistance is what matters for pin longevity.

https://lucasoil.com/pdf/TDS_Red-Tacky-Grease.pdf

http://www.super-lube.com/tech-data-...re-ezp-92.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timken_OK_Load

YMMV

Craig,
7Q
  #10  
Old May 30th 18, 06:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jonathan St. Cloud
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,463
Default Good lubricant for assembly

Hi Jon, might I ask what you use for pin lube?

On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 2:39:59 PM UTC-7, jfitch wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 1:03:41 PM UTC-7, Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot) wrote:
Agreed.
Vaseline is better than dry or old lube.
Cheap and easy to get.
Easy to use.

If assembling for a season, maybe something better.
Keep in mind, very limited movement so lube quality is less of an issue..
Yes, some may say the "wings will fall off" if you use the wrong lube. In this case, not likely.


I can't agree with the "anything" specification. The main pins do not move, but the lift and drag pins clearly do work in flight, with considerable pressure on them. Any glider a few years old will show signs of wear, galling, or Brinelling on those pins. From this is seems to me that something with some extreme pressure ingredients is desirable.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lubricant for spar pins Jonathan St. Cloud Soaring 38 January 10th 18 04:29 PM
Saturn IB S-IB Stage Thrust Structure Assembly at Michoud Assembly Facility 6974931.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 11th 07 02:45 AM
Saturn IB S-IB Stage Thrust Structure Assembly at Michoud Assembly Facility 6973027.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 11th 07 02:45 AM
Saturn IB S-IB Stage Assembly at Michoud Assembly Facility 6973447.jpg [email protected] Aviation Photos 0 April 11th 07 02:43 AM
Best lubricant for Mechanical Tachometer Cable??? RonLee Home Built 3 January 4th 05 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.