![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 13, 2018 at 10:03:30 AM UTC-4, wrote:
My LS-8 was set-up the same way from the factory. The front static ports are for the flight instruments. I used the boom statics for my S80. They work very well. There was a comment about dumping ballast and that water messing with the boom static ports. My boom static port system has four static port holes around the circumference of the boom. When I dump water I see no alteration in the display of the S80. I would imagine that is because the water does not wet all of the static ports. I have not gone to the trouble of equalizing the tubing lengths of the static and pitot systems. I will do that by just coiling the excess pitot tubing behind the panel. That sound like what I have - and I fly in the east, so we almost never use water ![]() ![]() I will try using the boom ports - the co location as a prerequisite stopped me from trying. WH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lx9070 V80 and Butterfly electronic and pnuemantic compensation | Jonathan St. Cloud | Soaring | 2 | May 5th 16 06:47 PM |
Non-TE probe compensation | Ale.L (RL) | Soaring | 7 | January 27th 15 03:23 PM |
Westerboer Vario with electronic total energy compensation | kd6veb | Soaring | 1 | August 3rd 11 08:25 PM |
Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (conclusions) | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 26th 05 05:02 PM |
Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (follow-up) | [email protected] | Soaring | 4 | September 20th 05 06:21 PM |