A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bomber Pilots Never Look Down



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 13th 04, 06:09 PM
Robert Briggs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ArtKramr wrote:
buf3 wrote:
ArtKramr wrote:


I was surprised to learn that bomber pilots never looked down.


Maybe *your* bomber pilot didn't look down as much as you would have
expected, but even that leaves two obvious questions.

How do you justify extrapolating from one example to "bomber pilots"
in general?

Did you have to call out directions to him on final approach at the
end of each mission?

Later that day I had to get in the copilots seat and complete an
air refueling the pilot could not handle. Several years later
when I was at SAC Headquarters this pilot's name came up for a
staff job there. I vetoed him immediately without reservation.


I would have voted to give your pilot that staff job. Get him the
hell out of airplanes where he might hurt someone.


I guess the wisdom of that would depend on the staff job in question:
after all, guys behind desks have a habit of sending aviators into
harm's way.
  #3  
Old August 13th 04, 08:45 PM
Howard Berkowitz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(ArtKramr) wrote:

Subject: Bomber Pilots Never Look Down
From: Robert Briggs
UCKET
Date: 8/13/2004 10:09 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

ArtKramr wrote:
buf3 wrote:
ArtKramr wrote:


I was surprised to learn that bomber pilots never looked down.


Maybe *your* bomber pilot didn't look down as much as you would have
expected, but even that leaves two obvious questions.

How do you justify extrapolating from one example to "bomber pilots"
in general?

Did you have to call out directions to him on final approach at the
end of each mission?

Later that day I had to get in the copilots seat and complete an
air refueling the pilot could not handle. Several years later
when I was at SAC Headquarters this pilot's name came up for a
staff job there. I vetoed him immediately without reservation.


I would have voted to give your pilot that staff job. Get him the
hell out of airplanes where he might hurt someone.


I guess the wisdom of that would depend on the staff job in question:
after all, guys behind desks have a habit of sending aviators into
harm's way.



Harm's way is the name of the game.


The name of the game is winning, and conserving your resources as best
you can so you can win the next game. Yes, the targeting staff could
just say "hit this target". Even then, and I realize the choices are
much more complex today, someone has to pick the right ordnance so you
don't have to go back.

But it may be staff guys that pick ingress and egress routes that thread
you through gaps in the air defense network. It may be staff guys who
plan deceptive feints to draw defenders away from the true hard target.

It may very well be not-even-rated staff operations research analysts
that figure out the most effective fighter coverage, the best bomb
patterns, etc. The engineers that designed the plane, the weapons, the
navaids, etc., may not even be "staff".

There are warriors that also can do very well with staff assignments --
Jimmy Doolittle was clearly one. People like that are national treasures
-- but so was Kelly Johnson.
  #9  
Old August 15th 04, 06:10 AM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Bomber Pilots Never Look Down
From: "Jack G"
Date: 8/14/2004 8:56 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Bomber Pilots Never Look Down
From: "Jack G"

Date: 8/14/2004 6:07 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:



"Dave Holford" wrote in message
.. .


ArtKramr wrote:

Subject: Bomber Pilots Never Look Down
From: Robert Briggs
UCKET
Date: 8/13/2004 10:09 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: 411CF5AF.A92C4F07@BITphysi

How do you justify extrapolating from one example to "bomber pilots"
in general?

Easy. All bomber pilots have one thing in common. They fly in

formation
eyes
fixed on the plane thay are formed on. No chance to look down. At

least
that is
my esperience, what is your experience?

Arthur Kramer


Might be true for B-26 pilots in the ETO during WWII. But that is a

long
way from "All bomber pilots."

Dave

Not in Art's little world...

Jack G.


If you call WW II a "little world", what war would you call a big world?

And
did you fight in it?


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


Art,

I wish you could read what others post. I did not say WW II was a small
world, I said your world was very small - which it is.

Jack G.


It's even smaller now.
PLONK



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #10  
Old August 16th 04, 06:59 PM
Robert Briggs
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ArtKramr wrote:
Robert Briggs wrote:

How do you justify extrapolating from one example to "bomber pilots"
in general?


Easy. All bomber pilots have one thing in common. They fly in formation
eyes fixed on the plane thay are formed on. No chance to look down.
At least that is my esperience, what is your experience?


"All bomber pilots", eh?

Sticking to your day-time B-26 raids, there must be at least one per
raid to which your argument cannot apply.

Not to mention the fact that the set of "all" bomber pilots (even in
WWII, let alone ever since the first grenade was dropped over the
side of a WWI biplane) includes Guy Gibson and Don Bennett ...

I don't need any *personal* experience to realise that yours is far
too limited to justify some of your generalisations.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? Cub Driver Military Aviation 106 May 12th 04 07:18 AM
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 Jukka O. Kauppinen Military Aviation 4 March 22nd 04 11:19 PM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 10:19 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.