![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I built a Zenith 601 XL with a Harley motor. It took about 7 months to
build alot of that time figuring out the motor stuff. Then 3 mo. waiting for the inspection. Well I just got my inspection done on the 9th and I took it up. WOW what a rush. You can see it at www.hog-air.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brett" wrote in message om... I built a Zenith 601 XL with a Harley motor. It took about 7 months to build alot of that time figuring out the motor stuff. Then 3 mo. waiting for the inspection. Well I just got my inspection done on the 9th and I took it up. WOW what a rush. You can see it at www.hog-air.com Nice ad. Nice movie. Looks torquey. How much rudder on takeoff? Also looks to be an installation where the cylinder head temps should be monitored and maybe the cylinders should be baffled. Love them Harleys, though. Evo runs much cooler than the shovel-head or panhead. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In motorcycle circles, aren't Harleys known more for their nostalga
and styling and less for their power to weight ratio? "Larry Smith" wrote in message ... "Brett" wrote in message om... I built a Zenith 601 XL with a Harley motor. It took about 7 months to build alot of that time figuring out the motor stuff. Then 3 mo. waiting for the inspection. Well I just got my inspection done on the 9th and I took it up. WOW what a rush. You can see it at www.hog-air.com Nice ad. Nice movie. Looks torquey. How much rudder on takeoff? Also looks to be an installation where the cylinder head temps should be monitored and maybe the cylinders should be baffled. Love them Harleys, though. Evo runs much cooler than the shovel-head or panhead. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
I agree with you on the style vs. power to weight, but a Harley does have the advantage of "loosing" the transmission and just using the engine as a direct drive. The PSRU would put the Harley into it's power range so that ain't too bad either. USAF used to use 2 Moto Guzzi V50 (500CC) engines on their prop driven pusher-puller design ROV in the late 80's. I saw one up close at a small field near the Arizona - Mexican border. Same idea, lose the gearbox and put a GM alternator to power all the toys in the baggage section. -- Bart D. Hull Tempe, Arizona Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/engine.html for my Subaru Engine Conversion Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/fuselage.html for Tango II I'm building. Jay wrote: In motorcycle circles, aren't Harleys known more for their nostalga and styling and less for their power to weight ratio? "Larry Smith" wrote in message ... "Brett" wrote in message .com... I built a Zenith 601 XL with a Harley motor. It took about 7 months to build alot of that time figuring out the motor stuff. Then 3 mo. waiting for the inspection. Well I just got my inspection done on the 9th and I took it up. WOW what a rush. You can see it at www.hog-air.com Nice ad. Nice movie. Looks torquey. How much rudder on takeoff? Also looks to be an installation where the cylinder head temps should be monitored and maybe the cylinders should be baffled. Love them Harleys, though. Evo runs much cooler than the shovel-head or panhead. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In motorcycle circles, aren't Harleys known more for their nostalga
and styling and less for their power to weight ratio? No, they are known for having to have a ute (and a trailer cause there will be more than one!) follow the ride to bring home the broken ones. Unless you count the fancy new motordesigned in Germany they have a typical TBO of 400 hours. Every Harley I know, is in pieces more often than it is riden. Hope this helps, Peter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bushy" wrote in message ... In motorcycle circles, aren't Harleys known more for their nostalga and styling and less for their power to weight ratio? No, they are known for having to have a ute (and a trailer cause there will be more than one!) follow the ride to bring home the broken ones. Unless you count the fancy new motordesigned in Germany they have a typical TBO of 400 hours. Every Harley I know, is in pieces more often than it is riden. Hope this helps, Peter The old panheads were not designed for durability. Neither were the shovelheads. The blockheads, or evos, last longer, run cooler, have more power to weight because they are much lighter -- with aluminum heads and cylinders. I put 30k trouble-free miles on an 89 Evo before selling it to a German for more than I paid for it new. So it's a good investment too. I stopped once to help an old-timer from Loozeeanner replace his clutch cable on a '69 shovelhead. He said the engine had over 80k miles on it and all he had repaired on the engine was the clutch. The clutch cable we replaced had been working for him since new. He also said he had gotten 20k miles on an o-ring chain. He had bought his Harley new. Who makes motorcycles in your country, and do you have a quality assurance report to make on them? Proud owner of a shovelhead and a panhead, both of which do fine and are well-maintained. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -- Al Mills Wake me before we take off... "Bushy" [said] ... the fancy new motor designed in Germany they have a typical TBO of 400 hours. You talking about the V-Rod engine? That's from Italy, not Germany. The HogAir pictures look like an Evolution engine to me, with some mods. Al Mills Wake me before we take off... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In motorcycle circles, aren't Harleys known more for their nostalga and styling and less for their power to weight ratio? Oh, they're known for their power to weight ratio - it's lower than just about any other bike (with the exception of my bicycle of course). Mark Hickey +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In the case of aircraft applications... this is a GOOD THING towards reliability. Barnyard BOb - .5 hp/cid |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
QUESTION:
Why doesn't Harley Davidson make televisions? ANSWER: They can't figure out how to make them leak oil. "Mark Hickey" wrote in message ... (Jay) wrote: In motorcycle circles, aren't Harleys known more for their nostalga and styling and less for their power to weight ratio? Oh, they're known for their power to weight ratio - it's lower than just about any other bike (with the exception of my bicycle of course). Mark Hickey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |