If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
I would say, a "properly flown tow" doesn't hurt much.
There are issues in ANY formation flying, a glider aero tow is formation flying. Do we at least agree on that (that an aero tow is formation flying)? Any aero tow (or even winch launch, etc.) has some risk. I have seen people fly low tow as a "new thing" when they normally did high tow. Common issue is waiting late to climb with the towplane. As I stated earlier, this discussion has been hashed out on RAS before as well as other places. To me, this is a "no win" for anyone. We train for both, which is good. I normally fly whatever tow is "usual" at a site. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
All my early flights were in South Africa, where low tow was the norm at my home field. I only remember one problem, when my heavily-ballasted Jantar-1 over-ran the towplane when it slowed on hitting a strong thermal. The towrope snaked over the canopy then passed over my left wing in a large loop.. I recovered just fine, but it did catch my attention!
I have had many more problems trying to maintain high tow in a fully ballasted Discus 2b and had several occasions where I ran out of elevator authority due to a slow tow, usually releasing prematurely. I managed to stay on once in such a slow tow, but sank into low tow position and had insufficient elevator to resume high tow at the speed flown. Maybe low tow has a slight aerodynamic edge with modern ships? Mike |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
On Tuesday, February 26, 2019 at 11:02:17 PM UTC-8, wrote:
In Australia we now transition higher, I use around 200’ before going into low tow. I have flown high tow at many overeas comps and still find low tow much more stable. The only time I fly high tow at home is on long cross country tows where I also pull the gear up (nose hook only!) and let the tug pilot accelerate in level flight. Weird, because long cross country tows is exactly the one time the rest of us use low tow! The height difference between a good low tow and a good high tow isn't much anyway. Twenty feet / six metres maybe? Maybe less. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
Yes!
Above the wake during a level (not climbing) tow, will place the glider quite a bit above the tow plane...not a good place to be... Low tow during level tow, just barely below the wake will place the glider only very slightly lower than the tow plane...a good place to be... So...anybody winning the argument yet? LOL Cookie Weird, because long cross country tows is exactly the one time the rest of us use low tow! The height difference between a good low tow and a good high tow isn't much anyway. Twenty feet / six metres maybe? Maybe less. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
So....I think you are bringing up a completely different issue now...the speed of the tow. If the problem is too slow of a tow....the solution is to get the tug to go faster...the solution is not high tow or low tow....
Accepted procedure is for the glider pilot to brief the tow pilot on any pertinent information needed for the tow...such as airspeed to be used... Many previous discussions on why a glider can fly at a fairly slow airspeed in free flight, yet can't comfortably fly that slow while on tow. Cookie On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 2:29:16 PM UTC-5, Mike the Strike wrote: All my early flights were in South Africa, where low tow was the norm at my home field. I only remember one problem, when my heavily-ballasted Jantar-1 over-ran the towplane when it slowed on hitting a strong thermal. The towrope snaked over the canopy then passed over my left wing in a large loop. I recovered just fine, but it did catch my attention! I have had many more problems trying to maintain high tow in a fully ballasted Discus 2b and had several occasions where I ran out of elevator authority due to a slow tow, usually releasing prematurely. I managed to stay on once in such a slow tow, but sank into low tow position and had insufficient elevator to resume high tow at the speed flown. Maybe low tow has a slight aerodynamic edge with modern ships? Mike |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
You do realise high and low refer to the slipstream don’t you!?
Speed of tow is the most important thing, I have not had so much flying in the USA but it is a problem at comps here when tug pilots used to towing slow two seaters and empty older gliders and turn up at a comp to tow heavily ballasted gliders. I understand there have been accidents over there from this. ASGs and JSs need more speed than 2-22s but some tug pilots cannot seem to see that! |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
I have always believed the wake basically goes DOWN behind the tow plane, being compressed, i.e. heavier, air, and/or maybe for other reasons. I don't remember feeling any wake turbulence just following the tow plane at the same height, climbing or level flight.
On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 2:21:01 PM UTC-8, Cookie wrote: Yes! Above the wake during a level (not climbing) tow, will place the glider quite a bit above the tow plane...not a good place to be... Low tow during level tow, just barely below the wake will place the glider only very slightly lower than the tow plane...a good place to be... So...anybody winning the argument yet? LOL Cookie |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
On Monday, 25 February 2019 15:28:09 UTC+2, Tango Eight wrote:
Chris Rollings: Being in low-tow when that happens simple makes the sunsequent event take about half a second longer - not enough extra time to greatly increase the chance of releasing before the critical point." So low tow does offer more time to react to a tug upset. From the info at hand it appears that a tug upset occurs over a duration of about 3 to 4 seconds. An additional 0.5 seconds on 4 seconds is a 12.5% increase. Why throw a free 12.5% additional safety margin away? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
high tow vs low tow
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:12:56 -0800, Tom BravoMike wrote:
I have always believed the wake basically goes DOWN behind the tow plane, being compressed, i.e. heavier, air, and/or maybe for other reasons. I don't remember feeling any wake turbulence just following the tow plane at the same height, climbing or level flight. Its caused by a wing generating lift. If you assume that the wake's downward angle is 1/3 of the wing's AOA you won't be far wrong. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apollo 13 pix last batch includes .par2s - "Apollo 13 Saturn V with boilerplate spacecraft during transfer move from High Bay 2 to High Bay 3 ap13-KSC-69P-684.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [109K] | hielan' laddie | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 12th 08 03:17 PM |
Apollo 13 pix last batch includes .par2s - "Apollo 13 Saturn V with boilerplate spacecraft during transfer move from High Bay 2 to High Bay 3 ap13-KSC-69P-683.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [121K] | hielan' laddie | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 12th 08 03:17 PM |
Apollo 13 pix last batch includes .par2s - "Apollo 13 Saturn V with boilerplate spacecraft during transfer move from High Bay 2 to High Bay 3 690808 ap13-KSC-69P-684.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [137K] | hielan' laddie | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 12th 08 03:17 PM |
Apollo 13 pix last batch includes .par2s - "Apollo 13 Saturn V with boilerplate spacecraft during transfer move from High Bay 2 to High Bay 3 690808 ap13-KSC-69P-683.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [155K] | hielan' laddie | Aviation Photos | 0 | September 12th 08 03:17 PM |
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... | Dave S | Home Built | 8 | June 2nd 04 04:12 PM |