![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Enlightenment wrote in message ...
"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:55:50 -0400, Cub Driver wrote: The XP-47 was ordered in 1939, and the XP-47B with a PW 2800 engine in January 1940. Did the USAAC even know about the FW-190 in January 1940? As the P47 did not enter combat service till March 10 1943 as the P47C perhaps they did by then. Of course the idea the US could redesign (defined as something as significant as water injection, most others define it as major changes) a fighter and place it into production within a month is the cornerstone of the claim. The wonder US production engineers (swamped Germany with numbers claims) versus the wonder German aircraft engineers (always a head in quality claims). Cliche central returns, the P-47 was designed without input from Germany. I'd consider that unlikely, but facts like that have never stopped our nazi loving BS merchant here. Please appologise: Ok we apologise that despite all our efforts you are going to continually ignore reality. "Originally designed to defeat the FW-190 series fighters, the XP-47J certainly would have exceeded this requirement. In point of fact, with its critical Mach of .83, it had the potential to chase down Me-262's by utilizing a shallow dive, taking advantage of its superior service ceiling." The XP47J entered service as the P47M. http://home.att.net/~Historyzone/Sev...Republic7.html Ah yes we now go from the P-47B and C models to the whole one, 1, single, only, XP-47J model. Backed by one person's opinion since they mention the wonder Fw190. J model approved in June 1943 as a lightweight version, only 6 guns fitted with reduced ammunition for example, less fuel tankage, used the sprint, 2,800 HP, engine, cooling fan fitted, flew in November 1943 and managed to do over 500 mph in Republic's hands in trials in August 1944. A 70% retooling needed to put it into production. Meantime the standard P-47D was modified to take the bigger engine, with130 were built as P-47Ms, with minimal modifications, in the final quarter of 1944. So of course the XP-47J was not the prototype of the P-47M. Oh yes the Spitfire had a higher limiting mach number, but rather poor initial acceleration in a dive, for when it comes to diving onto Me262s. Geoffrey Sinclair Remove the nb for email. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 18:34:15 +1000, "Geoffrey Sinclair"
wrote: Meantime the standard P-47D was modified to take the bigger engine, with130 were built as P-47Ms, with minimal modifications, in the final quarter of 1944. So of course the XP-47J was not the prototype of the P-47M. I just love how our bull****ting chum here manages to hoist himself upon his own hakenkreuz. greg -- Es ist mein Teil - nein Mein Teil - nein Denn das ist mein Teil - nein Mein Teil - nein |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted 5-cylinder B-75 Lawrence radial | Chris Wertman | Home Built | 5 | April 8th 10 02:11 AM |
Help ! SMALL Radial engine | Chris Wertman | Home Built | 12 | July 18th 05 02:46 PM |
Lead Radial Question | Stan Prevost | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | November 25th 04 06:20 PM |
World War Two Era U.S. Radial Engines (Curtiss and Pratt&Whitney) | Lincoln Brown | Military Aviation | 10 | February 13th 04 04:30 AM |
Help ! SMALL Radial engine | Chris Wertman | Military Aviation | 11 | January 4th 04 08:22 AM |