![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ref .
I notice your Oct 2 2018 flight on OLC had that peculiar highly compressed altitude graph, but without the gps altitude dropouts. Maybe that's just some unrelated OLC display issue. Good observation, I didn’t notice that. The one on 10/4 has the same compressed altitude issue, while the one on 10/3 looks ok, as does the flight on 5/1/19. I have been posting to OLC from that particular 9070 for about 4 years and haven’t had a problem before now. MS |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe he is exceeding VNE by a lot and going back in time? I wonder what Doc Brown would say.....LOL...
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’ve not heard back from Lxnav yet, but I had a private email from a very smart person that pointed out that both the October 2 and October 4 flights had the clock jump after takeoff but before soaring began. The flight this week had the clock jump a minute or so after soaring began, and thus is likely why OLC flagged this one and not the other two. It appears that the clock jump is 7 to 8 minutes after the unit is turned on. Since I generally do not turn the system on until just before takeoff, it is believed that the system is using an internal clock until it syncs with the gps satellites and then resets the clock which may be different by a couple of seconds. My plan is to turn the 9070 on a few minutes before launch to allow it to sync clocks to see if that helps. It is not clear to me if Dan’s issue is similar to mine or different.
MS |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's certainly worth a try.Â* My normal method is to saddle up, start
the engine, and turn on the CN2, the CN vario, and the PowerFlarm portable (which does not have an ENL license).Â* Then I run checklists and taxi out and, as soon as the temperatures are in the green, take off.Â* I'll try turning on the computers first and take my time with getting started and to the hold short line.Â* I'll shoot for 10 minutes and see how that goes. On 5/20/2019 2:42 PM, wrote: I’ve not heard back from Lxnav yet, but I had a private email from a very smart person that pointed out that both the October 2 and October 4 flights had the clock jump after takeoff but before soaring began. The flight this week had the clock jump a minute or so after soaring began, and thus is likely why OLC flagged this one and not the other two. It appears that the clock jump is 7 to 8 minutes after the unit is turned on. Since I generally do not turn the system on until just before takeoff, it is believed that the system is using an internal clock until it syncs with the gps satellites and then resets the clock which may be different by a couple of seconds. My plan is to turn the 9070 on a few minutes before launch to allow it to sync clocks to see if that helps. It is not clear to me if Dan’s issue is similar to mine or different. MS -- Dan, 5J |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, May 20, 2019 at 4:42:52 PM UTC-4, wrote:
I’ve not heard back from Lxnav yet, but I had a private email from a very smart person that pointed out that both the October 2 and October 4 flights had the clock jump after takeoff but before soaring began. The flight this week had the clock jump a minute or so after soaring began, and thus is likely why OLC flagged this one and not the other two. It appears that the clock jump is 7 to 8 minutes after the unit is turned on. Since I generally do not turn the system on until just before takeoff, it is believed that the system is using an internal clock until it syncs with the gps satellites and then resets the clock which may be different by a couple of seconds. My plan is to turn the 9070 on a few minutes before launch to allow it to sync clocks to see if that helps. It is not clear to me if Dan’s issue is similar to mine or different. MS We've established in another thread some months ago that the display of altitudes of a flight within the OLC web page is all messed up if OLC thinks that the flight "started" later, at some higher logged altitude, rather than at the altitude of the declared takeoff airport. (Typically due to the flight recorder not getting a GPS fix - or not being turned on at all - until after takeoff.) I am still of the opinion that this should be considered a bug in OLC, since it can "see" that the start location (lat/lon as well as altitude) is not at the airport. The altitudes inside the flight log file, even as downloaded from OLC, are still OK. Perhaps the time jump, too, makes OLC think it's a new "takeoff", and thus has similar consequences in its display (plus its "implausible" warning). But I don't quite understand the conjecture that "the system is using an internal clock until it syncs with the gps satellites", because prior to getting a GPS fix the flight recorder shouldn't be recording locations into the flight log either, no? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But I don't quite understand the conjecture that "the system is using an internal clock until it syncs with the gps satellites", because prior to getting a GPS fix the flight recorder shouldn't be recording locations into the flight log either, no?
Yes, the system seems to have a fix on the satellites and the Lat/Lon/Alt seems to be consistent from one record to another. It certainly doesn’t take several minutes for the system to get a gps fix. The question is why does it record an incremental time for a few minutes and then resets the time by a couple of seconds. It would seem the system should record the time stamp directly from the gps. If it did that, how could sequential time records change? Is it possible the gps starts with an internal clock number initially and then after a few minutes makes a comparison check with the clock from the gps? It gets back to Kensell’s point about how the gps system is handling the data and or the firmware is using the info inside the computers. These seem like good questions for vendors which I hope to get soon. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you're turning on the logger immediately before takeoff, you're risking losing
the early part of the flight entirely, not just having time problems. Good point. I’m not usually worried about the igc file much for casual flights which is what these all were. Or at least I wasn’t worried until the OLC problem. Of course for record, badge, or contest flights; I turn the computer and backup loggers on long before takeoff since tasks have to be entered and checked. You may be on the right track with the 2D vs 3D lock. I will try to look at the gps satellite status page before takeoff in the future. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All US Records are Now Motor Glider Records | Tango Eight | Soaring | 99 | March 23rd 17 12:07 PM |
OT 4 airport round robin - time lapsed / real time with ATC COMS -video | A Lieberma[_2_] | Owning | 0 | August 30th 09 12:26 AM |
OT 4 airport round robin - time lapsed / real time with ATC COMS -video | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | August 30th 09 12:26 AM |
4 airport round robin - time lapsed / real time with ATC COMS - video | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 30th 09 12:25 AM |
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap | tim liverance | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 03 12:18 AM |