A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ventus bT/cT comparison



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 26th 19, 11:04 PM
Ventus_a Ventus_a is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: May 2010
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Hirst View Post
On Saturday, April 21, 2012 at 12:26:44 PM UTC+12, Bob Gibbons wrote:


Every Ventus cT manual that I have looked at says the max weight with
the engine in is 430 kg regardless of the span. With the engine out,
500kg at 16.6. and 17.6m respectively

Cheers
Colin


Colin, you are correct in quoting the handbook. Several of us actually
discussed this apparent contradiction with Klaus Holighaus on a visit
a number of years ago.

He agreed that it so long as the non-lifting limit is followed, it
makes no difference whether the engine is in or out.

The engine represents a fuselage (non-lifting) load on the airframe,
the cause of this non-lifting load should not be a factor in the
overall gross weight, so long as the non-lifting limit is observed.

Bob


Sorry, but I'm still confused.

To my mind, a non-lifting limit is a hard limit, defined by the mechanical limit of the four wing-root pins. If you remove the engine (and fuel tank and engine battery) then this limit should not change; you've taken weight off the pins so can add more pilot weight etc. (ignoring balance considerations for the moment).

What the flight namual seems to be implying (and thanks, Colin, for the discussions) is that there are some wing bending issues. The (non-turbo) Ventus was designed for a MAUW of 500kg and the wing will cope fine with a max non-lifting weight of 255kg (for example - it varies depending on the model). What the manual seems to be implying is that SH then wanted to put a turbo in but came up against the (true) load limit of the wing pins, as well as some bending moment limitations on the wing, but the market need for a turbo version was great so they put a 430kg limitation on the MAUW.

I know that there are cT/bT pilots out there who ignore the 430kg limit and ballast up to 500kg with no issues. I'm asking the Collective Wisdom of y'all whether:
a) my reasoning above is correct;
b) whether to take the numbers in the flight manual with a grain of salt, bearing in mind the discussions with Herr Holigaus; and
c) whether it's worth asking SH to revise the flight manual to clear up the confusion; or
d) to obey the flight manual at all times and loads.

Answers on a postcard...

DH
TX
Hi David

Too cheap to use a postcard but may I suggest a talk with Pat re his experience with OP if you haven't already. I'm sure he can add something

:-) Colin
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yak-38 vs Yak-141 Size Comparison Rob[_6_] Naval Aviation 0 October 8th 10 01:49 AM
Aircraft comparison Jkgoblue Owning 1 November 23rd 05 10:18 PM
F-22 Comparison robert arndt Military Aviation 39 December 4th 03 04:25 PM
Comparison of IFR simulators Chris Kurz Simulators 0 October 27th 03 10:35 AM
EMW A6 Comparison to X-15 robert arndt Military Aviation 8 October 2nd 03 02:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.