If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
The standard lapse rate is 3.5F per 1000'. So it you are going to fly
at 5000' above the ground, the temp up there will be 17.5 degrees colder. Giving 5 degrees for variation, that is 22 degrees colder. So in this case it would have to be 44 degrees or higher on the ground to not have ice 5000' higher. (I've done some rounding). Of course you COULD have inversion. But inversion means it is warmer above. You could also have a non-standard lapse rate. But this is a calculation worth doing. Usually people have a place on the airplane where ice forms first. It will usually be something thin, like an antennae or strut. You can use that as a guage. Thin frontal surfaces ice up first and worse. Some sort of physics thing about the air in front deflecting the moisture. More deflection with fatter curves. But usually my first indication of ice has been decreased aircraft performance (if I am in level flight). Descending or climbing is a little harder to tell. As for decending. if it is rime, I think 1500' of undercast is usually fairly safe. If it is freezing rain then no-go. Someone mentioned 1500' per minute. But the most important thing is keeping the airplane upright and not overspeed. You may want to use your standard decent rate and not go around doing something different. The word is that horizontal stablizer icing is the worst thing on decent. Don't use flaps for landing if you have ice when you land and land a little faster. Do everything at higher airspeed if you have ice. This will keep you above stall speed (hopefully). See that is the problem. Due to different shape of the wing due to ice the plane will stall at a higher airspeed. Another item. We all know to stay out of thunderstorms, but you should stay out of towering cumulus too, even if they aren't thundering and lighting. It is icy in there. I think the abreviation for these is CB. Don't fly in CB's. A lot of times there is just a thin layer of clouds, like 1000' thick that you have to climb and decend through. And there is ice in them. That one is a close call. If you have a PIREP or other good info and know it is clear on top, it is tempting to try and climb on up. The lower the ceiling is below, the riskier this is. You will have to evaluate and make your own judgement. Talking to a pilot who has just landed is very valuable. Hang out at the fuel desk. Maybe someone will come in who just flew through it. Sometimes airmets are wrong. Ice tends to be worse at the initial part of the front, and an old icing airmet MAY be invalid, just hasn't been cancelled yet. All depends. But if someone comes down through it and he says he didn't pick up any ice and he doesnt think anyone would, that can be helpful information. Like someone else mentioned. you can venture fairly safely into icy clouds if you have warm VFR conditions under you, above the MEA, no mountains and flat terrain. If you ice up, just descend. If you tell ATC you have ice, be prepared to answer their questions about it. Rime or clean? What is the temperature etc. They usually want a full report. After all, if you have ice, YOU'RE the expert. Having a turbocharged and high power to weight ratio is a godsend in ice. Just climb up through it to clear above. Thats what the airlines do. Sometimes they dont even turn on their deice cause it takes away power. They'd just rather climb like a homesick angel and get out of it. All depends. But the point is, being able to CLIMB is a godsend. They need their deice mostly on decent. If you cant outclimb it, and you have low ceilings below you, my suggestion would be TURN AROUND, unless you know that you have VMC in front of you SOON. Presumbably, you didn't get ice back there and if you go back there you wont accumulate it. Whatever you do , don't just try and hold altitude while you go slower and slower. That's how you stall and spin. Even a decent below the MEA is safer than that strategy. And ATC will be telling you he cant give you any lower. Just declare an emergency if you have to. MEA's have at least 1000' cushion, usually more. It would be a desperate crap shoot to be accumulating ice, unable to hold altitude, and have to decend below the MEA. Good way to run into something. This is the reason why I don't do this kind of stuff. Like I said, we all get ice now and then if we fly in the clouds below freezing. But don't get yourself boxed in. If you don't have an out, fly to where you do have an out. And don't fly into a trap where you can't outclimb the ice, and you can't decend because of low ceilings. That is where the icing accidents occur. That and on landing with a load of ice. I hope that helps. Bottom line, you can't really do much about ice except stay out of it, or get out of it if you are in it. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
On 18 Nov 2005 11:39:06 -0800, Doug wrote:
Hey Doug The standard lapse rate is 3.5F per 1000'. So it you are going to fly at 5000' above the ground, the temp up there will be 17.5 degrees colder. Giving 5 degrees for variation, that is 22 degrees colder. So in this case it would have to be 44 degrees or higher on the ground to not have ice 5000' higher. (I've done some rounding). Of course you COULD have inversion. But inversion means it is warmer above. You could also have a non-standard lapse rate. But this is a calculation worth doing. My thoughts b4 launching was that most of the flight was going to be between 3500 and 4500 AGL on the first portion of the flight. Since sleet was falling, I honestly expected the temperature to remain or rise a little. More deflection with fatter curves. But usually my first indication of ice has been decreased aircraft performance (if I am in level flight). Descending or climbing is a little harder to tell. Yep, exactly right, I had to add power, and I knew that was not normal, thus no longer depending on the wings for icing but looking at the temperature probe. No wing strut for my Sundowner *smile*. As for decending. if it is rime, I think 1500' of undercast is usually fairly safe. If it is freezing rain then no-go. Someone mentioned 1500' per minute. But the most important thing is keeping the airplane upright and not overspeed. You may want to use your standard decent rate and not go around doing something different. Which was my initial thought, to maintain as "normal" as possible. I don't want to stick around in the clouds any longer then necessary, but I don't want do something reckless either by descending too quickly.. I wasn't even going to think about deploying flaps. Figured the less metal hanging out, the less that ice could collect. A lot of times there is just a thin layer of clouds, like 1000' thick that you have to climb and decend through. And there is ice in them. That one is a close call. For me, won't take a chance if there is known icing. Not worth it. Just like anything else we do, there is a risk of the unknown, but for me, if there is ice reported I simply won't go. If you tell ATC you have ice, be prepared to answer their questions about it. Rime or clean? What is the temperature etc. They usually want a full report. After all, if you have ice, YOU'RE the expert. Which I did when asked by Center. I was surprised that they gave me a block altitude. Maybe I was a little more pro-active and insuring I get out of the situation. Just glad it did not become an event. it. All depends. But the point is, being able to CLIMB is a godsend. They need their deice mostly on decent. If you cant outclimb it, and you have low ceilings below you, my suggestion would be TURN AROUND, Good advice, and in my case, I was right at the tops, so climbing was my only option. unless you know that you have VMC in front of you SOON. And this was my quandry. I was on top, BWG was VMC but from my view, it was solid overcast, yet ASOS reported broken 4300. So, I knew that the clouds were about 1700 feet thick based on my current conditions I was experiencing. Like I said, we all get ice now and then if we fly in the clouds below freezing. I truly hope I never get myself in this situation. Thankfully, I am down south where icing is an unusual event. I have been flying in the winter for two seasons, and only once did I come close to freezing temperatures in the clouds. It was a local flight, doing IFR training, and I had plenty of outs since it was local. But don't get yourself boxed in. If you don't have an out, fly to where you do have an out. And don't fly into a trap where you can't outclimb the ice, and you can't decend because of low ceilings. That is where the icing accidents occur. That and on landing with a load of ice. Bottom line, good advice above and well appreciated. Allen |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
On 18 Nov 2005 11:39:06 -0800, "Doug"
wrote: As for decending. if it is rime, I think 1500' of undercast is usually fairly safe. If it is freezing rain then no-go. Someone mentioned 1500' per minute. But the most important thing is keeping the airplane upright and not overspeed. You may want to use your standard decent rate and not go around doing something different. The word is that horizontal stablizer icing is the worst thing on decent. Don't use flaps for landing if you have ice when you land and land a little faster. Do everything at higher airspeed if you have ice. This will keep you above stall speed (hopefully). See that is the problem. Due to different shape of the wing due to ice the plane will stall at a higher airspeed. It is my understanding that ice forms less quickly when a propellor turns faster. If you want to descend quickly (low RPM) would the prop icing up and be a problem? As fo noticing ice, in the PA28 I fly, the first hint was on the left corner of the windshield (can't remember if it was top or bottom). There was also slight frosting on the temp probe. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
: For me, won't take a chance if there is known icing. Not worth it. Just
: like anything else we do, there is a risk of the unknown, but for me, if : there is ice reported I simply won't go. As someone else mentioned, icing airmets are present for large sections of the country for large portions of the year. Given the litigious society we're in and the unknown of icing, SCARE-MET zulu is issued if the conditions are possibly favorable for icing. It is sometimes possible to fly safely in such conditions if one knows what they're doing. It's also quite possible to be really stupid and/or ignorant about it and get into big trouble. Certainly nobody should fault you for a conservative attitude like that. If they are, they're an arrogant ass. Icing is nothing to mess around with for real. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
Just a side note. "Evaporated on its own" is called sublimation. Defined as
any time a substance goes from solid to vapor without a liquid phase. The flip side is when water vapor becomes frost without an itermediate liquid phase. That's the virtue of getting on top; any ice accumulated on the way up will sublimate off over time...within reason. A trace of rime, a glaze of clear...sure. An inch of mixed ice? Don't bet on getting on top. Bob Gardner Bob Gardner "A Lieberman" wrote in message ... What a flight I experienced yesterday! Got to do more things I never did which made for such a wonderful learning experiences and also raised questions in my mind (surprise, surprise!). Really worked over my decision on to launch or not to launch today to fly from 2G2 (Steubenville, OH) to BWG (Bowling Green, KY) to MBO (Madison MS). Was closely watching the weather in Ohio, winds on the ground, winds aloft, clouds and ceilings, freezing level and everything else weather could throw a kink. Called FSS yesterday and this morning, no reports of icing, only airmets for moderate turbulence 10K and below. No TFRs in my route. Cloud tops were forecasted to be 6000. The further south I go, the better the conditions. Headwinds of 40 knots for the first leg, and tail winds of 15 knots for the second leg. The upper winds forecast were just about spot on. 2G2 is an uncontrolled airport. Weather was suppose to be IFR this morning, and I have never left an uncontrolled airport in IFR conditions. This of course required that I call FSS and get an ATC clearance. Every other time I have left an uncontrolled airport, I got my clearance in the air, but today, too much scud floating above my head. Temperature on departure was 43 degrees, with light sleet and rain falling. Figured the decision to leave was good, as somewhere above my head would be warmer weather then freezing temperatures due to the sleet falling. Also, based on radar trends, I knew I would be out of the precipitation within 10 miles. Question 1 at the bottom of this post regarding this situation. Got my ATC clearance from FSS and had to be off the ground in 13 minutes or my clearance was void. Not a problem, as I was the only one in the traffic pattern *smile*. Off I go, entering IMC at 2000 feet (900 feet AGL). I turn on my Pitot tube heat. Rain and sleet was falling, temperature held at 43 degrees entering the clouds. Break out on top at 5500. Final cruise altitude was 6000 (so I thought). Air was silk smooth! The further south I go, the clouds start to slope up hill, and I am more in IMC the further I go. Amazingly, the further south I go, the lower the temperature goes too. About 1 hour into my flight, center calls me and says, Sundowner 1943L, I have a reroute for you, are you ready to copy. I had filed direct, but I still am old fashioned by tuning each VOR in my path to help with my situational awareness. I replied standby, and grab my pen and erasable paper. Center says, you are now cleared direct to York VOR then direct to BWG due to MOA activities. Look on my maps, could not find YRK. Punched NRST on Garmin 296, and York was not listed. Sheepishly, I key up the mike and ask center for the frequency of York VOR. Center graciously gave me the frequency, and I dial it in and start tracking toward the VOR. Since I was in IMC, didn't want to mess around with the GPS, since it did not show on the list of nearest. What concerned me even more, was my DME was not reading a distance. I then called back into center and asked for the distance to the York VOR. They said I had 90 miles to go! Well crap, no wonder I couldn't locate it on the maps, I wasn't looking far enough down the road! This made me feel a little better, as I started wondering if I had lost situational awareness. I was then able to quickly find the YRK VOR on the en route map, and then decided to program my 2 GPS's for the YRK VOR for distance until my DME picked up the signal. I used my NAV1 and NAV2 for tracking, which really was fun to do, since I have not really tracked a VOR en route for some time . Get to the YRK VOR, turn direct to BWG. At this point, I am skimming the tops of the clouds more in then out. In a matter of 10 miles the temperature went from 35 to 25 degrees around this VOR. Watching my wings, see no ice, watching my windscreen, no beads of water or ice so I figured all was well (so I thought). I am still skimming the tops of the clouds, in visible moisture, but not your typical "hard" IMC. A few minutes later, I noticed that I had to sneak in a little more power then normal, which I thought was odd, so I decided lean a little forward to take a peek at the temperature probe. Sure enough there is a small coating of rime ice! I call into center and request to climb to 6,500 due to ice, and center quickly approved giving me a block altitude from 6000 to 7000. Center asked me to report when I climbed out of the clouds and to report when the icing has shedded. Cool I thought, I would stay 500 feet above the clouds and climb when needed. Turned out the clouds were reasonably level, so I was able to maintain level flight at 6,500. When the sun hit the wings, I could clearly see the ice on the leading edges as well as the leading edge of the stabilator. This really alarmed me as I could not see it while in "semi" IMC. I also was shocked how much accumulated in "semi IMC" as it was like wisps of clouds zinging by with some hard IMC interjected. I never really did shed the ice, it kinda evaporated on it's own, as the outside temperature was now down to 18 degrees. I reported to Center that I was out of the clouds and the ice was slowly disappearing. So now here I am on top, solid overcast and wondering just how safe will it be to descend through the cloud deck! (Question 3) Luckily, this never had to be answered as within 10 miles of BWG, the clouds broke up and I was cleared for a visual approach into BWG. I was monitoring any AWOS, ASOS and ATIS en route and found the closer to BWG I got the thinner the clouds got. Question 1 on Sleet. In my case, it was 43 on the ground, and on my climb to my altitude, the temperature remained well above 32 while I was in IMC. I climbed to 6000 which was my designated altitude. I broke out at 5,500. How far up can sleet be created and not melt before hitting the ground? There was a layer of clouds above me. Seems that from the ground to 6000 feet, I came across some hardy sleet pellets to survive that long in above freezing temperatures? Question 2 on icing. Had I not climbed up like I did, I would have never seen the ice on the wings or stabilator. I now know to look on that temperature probe for first signs of icing as I did today, but will it readily show up in IMC without reflections of the sun? Especially clear icing? Where else should I look besides the temperature probem? I have a white plane with blue strips in the wing tips, but I never saw the ice! It truly scared the bejeebers out of me to see the ice on the leading edges, and luckily, I am intimately aware of my plane and it's idiosycrosies that I knew that adding power was not a normal thing for straight and level flight. Question 3 on icing. knowing that flying into known icing is a big no no, (no kidding!). So, here I am on top, evaluating the cloud thickness, and finding that the clouds were generally 1,500 feet thick. Temperatures were dropping, which made me even more nervous about descending. Obviously every situation is different, but what would be a reasonable amount of time for descending into clouds that the temperature appears to be below freezing when the cloud deck is NOT thick. Figuring on 500 feet per minute descent, for me, 1500 feet is rather thick for 3 minutes. I would naturally descend quickly and as safely as possible, but is there a reasonable gauge for getting below a potentially THIN icy cloud deck? Clouds today were widespread all the way down to BWG. When I left, ceilings at BWG were 4200 which would have been a 1800 thick layer of clouds. As forecasted, the clouds broke up, but what if the forecast had busted? It's not like I could dip my wings to see if I get ice or not. Thanks for answering my questions! Allen |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:11:04 -0500, Dave Butler wrote:
wrote: It is my understanding that ice forms less quickly when a propellor turns faster. If you want to descend quickly (low RPM) would the prop icing up and be a problem? Don't know the answer to the icing question, but if I want to descend faster (vertical speed) I go to *high* RPM. More drag and you can point the nose down more steeply without picking up as much speed. Thanks. I guess you have variable prop - I don't (PA28) :-) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
A Lieberman wrote:
I'm going to answer these before I read the other replies, to avoid prejudicing my own answers. Apologies for any duplication. Question 1 on Sleet. In my case, it was 43 on the ground, and on my climb to my altitude, the temperature remained well above 32 while I was in IMC. I climbed to 6000 which was my designated altitude. I broke out at 5,500. How far up can sleet be created and not melt before hitting the ground? There was a layer of clouds above me. Seems that from the ground to 6000 feet, I came across some hardy sleet pellets to survive that long in above freezing temperatures? I fly some IMC in winter here in central Canada and the NE US in my Warrior, and do occasionally encounter ice at altitude. Still, I would not take off if I saw sleet or ice pellets, period. I probably wouldn't even try it in a twin with boots, due to the risk of severe clear. Question 2 on icing. Had I not climbed up like I did, I would have never seen the ice on the wings or stabilator. I now know to look on that temperature probe for first signs of icing as I did today, but will it readily show up in IMC without reflections of the sun? Clear icing will show up easily on the probe, even at night, because it changes the shape of the tip. Rime icing, maybe less so. Figuring on 500 feet per minute descent, for me, 1500 feet is rather thick for 3 minutes. You might not want to descend that slowly through an icing layer. I don't think there's any reliable measure for how slowly or fast you can ice up -- I haven't had this happen to me, but I know people who've had the windscreen ice over almost instantly, as if someone threw a bucket of paint on it. You have to be prepared to land in a slip, looking out the storm window, if your defrost cannot clear it. If you're going to have to descend through a possible icing layer, set up everything in your favour beforehand: carb heat on, pitot heat on, defroster on, a big post-it note on your flap switch or handle saying "DON'T TOUCH" (flaps can cause a tail stall if you've encountered ice), and a fairly steep approach slope. Try to keep the throttle as far open as you can and don't slow down too much. Oh, did I mention? Don't touch the flaps. All the best, David |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Yesterday's IFR flight with questions
" wrote:
a big post-it note on your flap switch or handle saying "DON'T TOUCH" (flaps can cause a tail stall if you've encountered ice), Is that true in a low wing? -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |