![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 10, 6:32*pm, "Paul Remde" wrote:
http://www.eaa.org/lightplaneworld/a...iderflight.asp Nice article. But, arggh, a soft release in a Grob? With a Tost tow hook? Really? Just curious, is this a US only aberration or is this dangerous practice used in other countries? Kirk Grumpy in snowy Illinois |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 11, 10:51*am, 66 wrote:
On Feb 10, 6:32*pm, "Paul Remde" wrote: http://www.eaa.org/lightplaneworld/a...iderflight.asp Nice article. But, arggh, a soft release in a Grob? With a Tost tow hook? Really? Just curious, is this a US only aberration or is this dangerous practice used in other countries? Kirk Grumpy in snowy Illinois The PTS says "normal towline tension" This is the way I was taught, and the way I teach. Every tow pilot I have ever asked said they would prefer normal tension release. Every textbook I can remember reading says normal tension. I cannot think of one good reason for a "soft release" and many possible problems with it. I have no idea where this concept came from, and why it is still use/taught in some places. It is funny how bad ideas seem to "stick"...... When I do check rides for pilots I don't know, I usually say "Now you're not going to do a "soft release" are you?" Sometimes I forget and they really scare the crap out of me when they suddenly pull up and then dive!!! There is a movement to standardize soaring instruction and procedures.......He is an area which needs attention! Cookie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, " wrote: On Feb 11, 10:51*am, 66 wrote: On Feb 10, 6:32*pm, "Paul Remde" wrote: http://www.eaa.org/lightplaneworld/a...iderflight.asp Nice article. But, arggh, a soft release in a Grob? With a Tost tow hook? Really? Just curious, is this a US only aberration or is this dangerous practice used in other countries? Kirk Grumpy in snowy Illinois The PTS says "normal towline tension" This is the way I was taught, and the way I teach. Every tow pilot I have ever asked said they would prefer normal tension release. Every textbook I can remember reading says normal tension. I cannot think of one good reason for a "soft release" and many possible problems with it. I have no idea where this concept came from, and why it is still use/taught in some places. It is funny how bad ideas seem to "stick"...... When I do check rides for pilots I don't know, I usually say "Now you're not going to do a "soft release" are you?" Sometimes I forget and they really scare the crap out of me when they suddenly pull up and then dive!!! There is a movement to standardize soaring instruction and procedures.......He is an area which needs attention! Cookie Soft release is an old-time Schweizer thing. The Schweizer 2-33 frame has a small cross member just in front of the tow release that gets hit by the tow release arm when the rope is released under tension. Eventually, the little cross member cracks. This lets in moisture and then you get corrosion. The soft release was an attempt to prevent that. People were taught to do this by old-time Schweizer instructors but were never told why. The practice took on a life of it's own and persists. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 11, 3:32*pm, Berry wrote:
In article , " wrote: On Feb 11, 10:51*am, 66 wrote: On Feb 10, 6:32*pm, "Paul Remde" wrote: http://www.eaa.org/lightplaneworld/a...iderflight.asp Nice article. But, arggh, a soft release in a Grob? With a Tost tow hook? Really? Just curious, is this a US only aberration or is this dangerous practice used in other countries? Kirk Grumpy in snowy Illinois The PTS says "normal towline tension" *This is the way I was taught, and the way I teach. *Every tow pilot I have ever asked said they would prefer normal tension release. *Every textbook I can remember reading says normal tension. I cannot think of *one good reason for a "soft release" and many possible problems with it. *I have no idea where this concept came from, and why it is still use/taught in some places. *It is funny how bad ideas seem to "stick"...... *When I do check rides for pilots I don't know, I usually say "Now you're not going to do a "soft release" are you?" * Sometimes I forget and they really scare the crap out of me when they suddenly pull up and then dive!!! There is a movement to standardize soaring instruction and procedures.......He is an area which needs attention! Cookie Soft release is an old-time Schweizer thing. The Schweizer 2-33 frame has a small cross member just in front of the tow release that gets hit by the tow release arm when the rope is released under tension. Eventually, the little cross member cracks. This lets in moisture and then you get corrosion. The soft release was an attempt to prevent that. People were taught to do this by old-time Schweizer instructors but were never told why. The practice took on a life of it's own and persists.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I have seen this cracking problem with Schweizers....I have also seen Schweizers with a little rubber bumper pad installed where the hook swings up, so it bounces off without causing any damage. I do not know if this was "original equipment" I have also seen a few Schweizers where the tow hook has gotten "stiff" and will not open by gravity alone. It would be possible to pull the release, with no tension on the rope, and have the rear part of the mech. just go back in place with no release! At least with "normal" tension on the rope, you are sure to release. (Yeah, the stiff hook shoudl be repaired/adjusted). I think the soft release deal is sort of fixing a small problem by creating a big problem. Cookie |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly. A certain soaring site in Arizona, which flew both G103's
and 2-33's insisted on "soft releases" in either, I guess standardizing the process for the towpilots. This was 20 years ago - The last time I visited to rent, there was no mention of this during the check ride. --Sarah On Feb 11, 2:32*pm, Berry wrote: In article , " wrote: On Feb 11, 10:51*am, 66 wrote: On Feb 10, 6:32*pm, "Paul Remde" wrote: http://www.eaa.org/lightplaneworld/a...iderflight.asp Nice article. But, arggh, a soft release in a Grob? With a Tost tow hook? Really? Just curious, is this a US only aberration or is this dangerous practice used in other countries? Kirk Grumpy in snowy Illinois The PTS says "normal towline tension" *This is the way I was taught, and the way I teach. *Every tow pilot I have ever asked said they would prefer normal tension release. *Every textbook I can remember reading says normal tension. I cannot think of *one good reason for a "soft release" and many possible problems with it. *I have no idea where this concept came from, and why it is still use/taught in some places. *It is funny how bad ideas seem to "stick"...... *When I do check rides for pilots I don't know, I usually say "Now you're not going to do a "soft release" are you?" * Sometimes I forget and they really scare the crap out of me when they suddenly pull up and then dive!!! There is a movement to standardize soaring instruction and procedures.......He is an area which needs attention! Cookie Soft release is an old-time Schweizer thing. The Schweizer 2-33 frame has a small cross member just in front of the tow release that gets hit by the tow release arm when the rope is released under tension. Eventually, the little cross member cracks. This lets in moisture and then you get corrosion. The soft release was an attempt to prevent that. People were taught to do this by old-time Schweizer instructors but were never told why. The practice took on a life of it's own and persists. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 5:04*pm, Sarah wrote:
Exactly. *A certain soaring site in Arizona, which flew both G103's and 2-33's insisted on "soft releases" in either, I guess standardizing the process for the towpilots. *This was 20 years ago - The last time I visited to rent, there was no mention of this during the check ride. --Sarah I think I saw some mention of this in info on that gliderport's website. The last check ride where I had somebody do that, a hard pull up followed by a big dive, then release..the guy said he learned it at that place too. When I asked him "why" they do that, he had no answer, just "that's they way they told me". What is the "plus" of soft release as far as tow pilot is concerned? BTW....I searched the "soft release" on the Internet, and found one textbook which has a section on "soft release" I do not know what the book actually says about the soft release, but there is a section about it.....Hopefully it says the soft release is a bad idea. I also found some reports from a Soaring Safety Foundation meeting, where all agreed on the "normal tension" release, and recommended a rubber bumper be installed in the tow hook of the SGS-2-33. One of my favorite textbooks is "Beginning Gliding" by Derek Piggott.....He has a couple of paragraphs about relaese for aero tow. He warns of the dangers of diving before release, as well as the problems of trying to release under "increased" tension. Are people confuing release technique for winch launch and aerotow launch?? Cookie Cookie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice article | smithcorp | Soaring | 10 | September 28th 10 11:43 PM |
Nice soaring article | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | September 20th 06 06:16 PM |
Nice article | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | August 12th 06 06:56 AM |
Nice article about flying around NYC | Mr. Smith | Piloting | 4 | August 23rd 04 05:58 AM |
Nice article on AngelFlight | C J Campbell | Piloting | 7 | November 14th 03 07:34 AM |