A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Standard rate turn in Boeing 757?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 5th 04, 05:01 AM
Ed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Although John Bell correctly provides the technical calcs to figure the
angle of bank for standard rate turns, the point is the radius [and
ultimately, the rate] of the turn is based on the airspeed, not the size of
the aircraft. If an airplane needs to tighten the turn radius without
increasing the bank angle, it can be done by decreasing speed and/or
descending.


  #12  
Old June 5th 04, 07:38 AM
Jim Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"vincent p. norris" wrote in message
...
As for what they're capable of, remember Tex Johnson(sp?) barrel rolled
the 707 prototype (the "Dash-80").


Actually, an aileron roll, Paul. I know his book, ghost written by
another, says barrel roll, but the tape shows it's an aileron roll.

Among non-fliers, all rolls are "barrel rolls," just as all loops are
"loop-de-loops" and among Southerners, all Northerners are
"Damnyankees."

vince norris


Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape numerous
times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls (23 continuous
ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707 prototype that day over Lake
Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it was a barrel roll. He dove, he
climbed and he did a constant "speed" roll about a point which is close to
the definition of a barrel roll as I can get without a book in front of me.
An aileron roll is a roll about the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. He
did not do a 360 roll around the longitudinal axis.

Regards,

JB


  #13  
Old June 5th 04, 07:48 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Baker" wrote in message
...
Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape

numerous
times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls (23

continuous
ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707 prototype that day over

Lake
Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it was a barrel roll.


All those times you watched the tape, you never figured out it's Lake
Washington?



Pete


  #14  
Old June 5th 04, 07:53 AM
Jim Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Jim Baker" wrote in message
...
Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape

numerous
times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls (23

continuous
ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707 prototype that day over

Lake
Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it was a barrel roll.


All those times you watched the tape, you never figured out it's Lake
Washington?



Pete

Sigh,

JB


  #15  
Old June 5th 04, 10:48 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Emergency Descent, the flight
manual called for a bank angle of 45 degrees to aid in getting the
nose down and eliminating negative "g"s.


Wow. Don't the passengers screaming get on your nerves?

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
  #16  
Old June 5th 04, 01:59 PM
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Bell" wrote
From Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators

n=1/cos(bank angle)

n= load factor in G's


True...for a level turn, but when no attempt is made to maintain
altitude, bank angle and load factor are not related.

Bob Moore
Who also preaches from the "bible" :-)
  #17  
Old June 5th 04, 02:41 PM
Bob Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Baker" wrote

Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape
numerous times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls
(23 continuous ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707
prototype that day over Lake Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it
was a barrel roll. He dove, he climbed and he did a constant "speed"
roll about a point which is close to the definition of a barrel roll
as I can get without a book in front of me. An aileron roll is a roll
about the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. He did not do a 360 roll
around the longitudinal axis.



Vince has it right. You must have missed last year's "barrel-roll
discussion", a portion of which is quoted from William Kershner's
book "The Flight Instructor's Manual". Do a newsgroup Google search
for barrel roll and you will find the entire debate between "Big John"
and myself.

"How-
You might use the following explanation, or develop your own:
(1) Make sure the area is clear, then pick a reference on
the horizon off the wing tip as in the wingover and lazy eight.
(2) Set the throttle to low cruise rpm and ease the nose over to pick-
up about 10 K more than used for the wingover or set up the
airspeed used for a loop, whichever is higher. Power adjustment
should not be necessary during the maneuver. You might have
some of your sharper trainees apply full power as the airplane
approaches inverted and then remind them to throttle back as the
airspeed picks up in the last part of the maneuver.
(3) Smoothly pull the nose up and start a coordinated climbing turn
(note that it will have to be at a much faster rate than was used
for the wingover) toward the reference point. (Assume that at first
the roll will be to the left.)
(4) When the nose is 45° from the original heading, it should be at its
highest pitch attitude and the left bank should be vertical.
(5) When the nose is at 90° from the original heading, you should be
looking directly at the reference point that was originally off the
wing tipfrom a completely inverted position (momentarily).
(6) When the airplane heading is again 45° from the original, the bank
is vertical but you will be in a right bank as far as the ground is
concerned; that is, the right wing is pointing straight down at this
instant of roll. The nose will be at its lowest pitch attitude at
this point.
(7) The roll is continued to wings-level flight as the nose is raised
back to the cruise attitude."

Note that half-way through the maneuver, the nose of the airplane
is 90 degrees to original heading at the same time that the airplane
is inverted.

Bob Moore
  #18  
Old June 5th 04, 02:46 PM
Jerry Kurata
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Unless they look out the window the passengers won't even notice the
manuver. Done correctly, the G's stay at 1 and the wine does not spill.

"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

Emergency Descent, the flight
manual called for a bank angle of 45 degrees to aid in getting the
nose down and eliminating negative "g"s.


Wow. Don't the passengers screaming get on your nerves?

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com



  #19  
Old June 5th 04, 03:23 PM
Martin Hotze
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 05:48:00 -0400, Cub Driver wrote:

Emergency Descent, the flight
manual called for a bank angle of 45 degrees to aid in getting the
nose down and eliminating negative "g"s.


Wow. Don't the passengers screaming get on your nerves?


the doors are locked. who cares ...? :-)

#m

--
Martin!!! Maaaaartiiiin!!! Can you please flame this guy for me?
'HECTOP' in rec.aviation.piloting
  #20  
Old June 5th 04, 03:48 PM
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cub Driver" wrote in message

Emergency Descent, the flight
manual called for a bank angle of 45 degrees to aid in getting the
nose down and eliminating negative "g"s.


Wow. Don't the passengers screaming get on your nerves?


If you're initiating an emergency descent on a passenger flight, the pax
would likely already be screaming, what with the fog and dangling masks.
Probably wouldn't even notice the roll. :-)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
Boeing 757 turn rate? Garyurbach Aerobatics 6 June 14th 04 04:43 PM
Boeing 757 turn rate? Garyurbach Military Aviation 1 June 7th 04 05:48 PM
763 Cruising Speed. [email protected] General Aviation 24 February 9th 04 09:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.