![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although John Bell correctly provides the technical calcs to figure the
angle of bank for standard rate turns, the point is the radius [and ultimately, the rate] of the turn is based on the airspeed, not the size of the aircraft. If an airplane needs to tighten the turn radius without increasing the bank angle, it can be done by decreasing speed and/or descending. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "vincent p. norris" wrote in message ... As for what they're capable of, remember Tex Johnson(sp?) barrel rolled the 707 prototype (the "Dash-80"). Actually, an aileron roll, Paul. I know his book, ghost written by another, says barrel roll, but the tape shows it's an aileron roll. Among non-fliers, all rolls are "barrel rolls," just as all loops are "loop-de-loops" and among Southerners, all Northerners are "Damnyankees." vince norris Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape numerous times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls (23 continuous ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707 prototype that day over Lake Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it was a barrel roll. He dove, he climbed and he did a constant "speed" roll about a point which is close to the definition of a barrel roll as I can get without a book in front of me. An aileron roll is a roll about the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. He did not do a 360 roll around the longitudinal axis. Regards, JB |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Baker" wrote in message
... Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape numerous times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls (23 continuous ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707 prototype that day over Lake Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it was a barrel roll. All those times you watched the tape, you never figured out it's Lake Washington? ![]() Pete |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Jim Baker" wrote in message ... Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape numerous times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls (23 continuous ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707 prototype that day over Lake Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it was a barrel roll. All those times you watched the tape, you never figured out it's Lake Washington? ![]() Pete Sigh, JB |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Emergency Descent, the flight manual called for a bank angle of 45 degrees to aid in getting the nose down and eliminating negative "g"s. Wow. Don't the passengers screaming get on your nerves? all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Bell" wrote
From Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators n=1/cos(bank angle) n= load factor in G's True...for a level turn, but when no attempt is made to maintain altitude, bank angle and load factor are not related. Bob Moore Who also preaches from the "bible" :-) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Baker" wrote
Vince...everyone is entitled to their opinion. I've seen that tape numerous times and I've done and taught several hundred aileron rolls (23 continuous ones once in a T-38) and barrel rolls. The 707 prototype that day over Lake Seattle did not do an aileron roll, it was a barrel roll. He dove, he climbed and he did a constant "speed" roll about a point which is close to the definition of a barrel roll as I can get without a book in front of me. An aileron roll is a roll about the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. He did not do a 360 roll around the longitudinal axis. Vince has it right. You must have missed last year's "barrel-roll discussion", a portion of which is quoted from William Kershner's book "The Flight Instructor's Manual". Do a newsgroup Google search for barrel roll and you will find the entire debate between "Big John" and myself. "How- You might use the following explanation, or develop your own: (1) Make sure the area is clear, then pick a reference on the horizon off the wing tip as in the wingover and lazy eight. (2) Set the throttle to low cruise rpm and ease the nose over to pick- up about 10 K more than used for the wingover or set up the airspeed used for a loop, whichever is higher. Power adjustment should not be necessary during the maneuver. You might have some of your sharper trainees apply full power as the airplane approaches inverted and then remind them to throttle back as the airspeed picks up in the last part of the maneuver. (3) Smoothly pull the nose up and start a coordinated climbing turn (note that it will have to be at a much faster rate than was used for the wingover) toward the reference point. (Assume that at first the roll will be to the left.) (4) When the nose is 45° from the original heading, it should be at its highest pitch attitude and the left bank should be vertical. (5) When the nose is at 90° from the original heading, you should be looking directly at the reference point that was originally off the wing tipfrom a completely inverted position (momentarily). (6) When the airplane heading is again 45° from the original, the bank is vertical but you will be in a right bank as far as the ground is concerned; that is, the right wing is pointing straight down at this instant of roll. The nose will be at its lowest pitch attitude at this point. (7) The roll is continued to wings-level flight as the nose is raised back to the cruise attitude." Note that half-way through the maneuver, the nose of the airplane is 90 degrees to original heading at the same time that the airplane is inverted. Bob Moore |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unless they look out the window the passengers won't even notice the
manuver. Done correctly, the G's stay at 1 and the wine does not spill. "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... Emergency Descent, the flight manual called for a bank angle of 45 degrees to aid in getting the nose down and eliminating negative "g"s. Wow. Don't the passengers screaming get on your nerves? all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 05:48:00 -0400, Cub Driver wrote:
Emergency Descent, the flight manual called for a bank angle of 45 degrees to aid in getting the nose down and eliminating negative "g"s. Wow. Don't the passengers screaming get on your nerves? the doors are locked. who cares ...? :-) #m -- Martin!!! Maaaaartiiiin!!! Can you please flame this guy for me? 'HECTOP' in rec.aviation.piloting |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cub Driver" wrote in message Emergency Descent, the flight manual called for a bank angle of 45 degrees to aid in getting the nose down and eliminating negative "g"s. Wow. Don't the passengers screaming get on your nerves? If you're initiating an emergency descent on a passenger flight, the pax would likely already be screaming, what with the fog and dangling masks. Probably wouldn't even notice the roll. :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Boeing 757 turn rate? | Garyurbach | Aerobatics | 6 | June 14th 04 04:43 PM |
Boeing 757 turn rate? | Garyurbach | Military Aviation | 1 | June 7th 04 05:48 PM |
763 Cruising Speed. | [email protected] | General Aviation | 24 | February 9th 04 09:30 PM |