![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ken Sandyeggo" wrote in message
... From someone who's been around the block a few times, if you pick training and a profession based solely on what it pays, you're doomed to miserableness. If you don't love, or at least like a lot what you're doing, you may as well go straight to hell, do not pass "GO" and do not collect the $200. More pay is way less desireable than doing something you love to do. I finally got bored with my sign shop after almost 13 years, sold it and am now almost halfway through a course in nursing so I can work with kids, something I first thought of about 35 years ago. The next oldest student in my class is 18 years my junior and I'm 40 years older than the youngest one. Save working for starving wages, do what your heart tells you. Don't let anything stop you or anyone talk you out of it. There'll be struggles and hard times, but in the end, you'll be much richer than the guy that slugs it out at a job he hates for 40 years in order to get a pension......that may or may not be there when he expects it. Just had an ex-sister-in-law that stayed devoted to ATT in Chicago for over 22 years, commuting over 90 miles per day via car and train one-way to get there. She would have been eligible for her pension in a couple of years and was looking forward to it. "Sorry, we're closing the department. Here's a couple months pay and good luck in your job hunt." (Sound of door slamming behind her). She gets diddly, because the pension "benefit" was completely company funded, so she had no vested interest in it at all. That sounds good when you're first hired; a free pension. Her pension was worth exactly what she put into it....zilch. Ken J. - Sandy Eggo Thanks for that, it pretty much sums up the way I feel. However, I'm not looking into the money in order to make the decision, I'm looking into the practicalities of a decision I've just about made. Unfortunately the amount of money I unexpectedly came across is just barely enough to do the course, so it won't pay for many extra hours above the licence itself. So I'll end up spending $40K and have 105 hours clocked up. If I can't then get some extra hours up at someone else's expense, my current job certainly won't provide for them with a wife, kids, mortgage, and car loan to feed. I need to be practical about it, cause the other course of action with $40k would mean, NO car loan, HALF the mortgage, and a wife who would then be able to quit her job and work part time - which has been her dream for a long time. Her dream, or mine? As much as I like doing things for ME, I love doing things for her, and so if I can't increase my income from this dream, then I'd rather help her meet her dream. Besides, I'm over 38, I'd be 39 by the time I finished the course, that means trying to find work at 40, with only 105 hours clocked up. I don't see that happening. I would think, that 105 hours and then basically NONE, might actually hurt far more than never having flown. Oh well, it's given me food for thought, 45 hours less time to get the licence, means 45 more lots of $350 in my pocket, which means more than enough to go to the US, do the licence, come back, and also spend a nice chunk on the Missus, but I'd need to look into the requirements once I get back here, regarding changing the licence over. Trentus |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would'nt fly a helicopter in Australia if i was you. They do not keep track
of hours in use, which determines a maintenance schedule. Come to the usa Pompano Helicopters |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ChopperJon2 wrote: I would'nt fly a helicopter in Australia if i was you. They do not keep track of hours in use, which determines a maintenance schedule. Come to the usa Pompano Helicopters I beg your pardon! And don't just quote one accident report from station properties. Whats your reasons for the statement? r |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think 'Ops' has got it fairly wrong. In the large, Australian operators maintain excellent records and safe machines (as is required by law). -- dharakos ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() dharakos wrote: I think 'Ops' has got it fairly wrong. In the large, Australian operators maintain excellent records and safe machines (as is required by law). -- dharakos ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - No I queried the statement below by Chopper Jon2. The R22 which had a blade failure in Queensland is the one that comes to mind which the hours were not recorded correctly and in doing so the R22 main rotor blade incurred a fatigue-related in-flight separation failure. http://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation/occu...ail.cfm?ID=294 r .................................................. ............................. ChopperJon2 wrote: I would'nt fly a helicopter in Australia if i was you. They do not keep track of hours in use, which determines a maintenance schedule. Come to the usa Pompano Helicopters I beg your pardon! And don't just quote one accident report from station properties. Whats your reasons for the statement? r |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Oops, sorry Ops - I actually meant that the person making the blanket statement that Australian operators don't record times was wrong. Sorry got the names a bit mixed! ops wrote: *dharakos wrote: I think 'Ops' has got it fairly wrong. In the large, Australian operators maintain excellent records and safe machines (as is required by law). -- dharakos ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - No I queried the statement below by Chopper Jon2. The R22 which had a blade failure in Queensland is the one that comes to mind which the hours were not recorded correctly and in doing so the R22 main rotor blade incurred a fatigue-related in-flight separation failure. http://tinyurl.com/rkl9 r .................................................. ............................. ChopperJon2 wrote: I would'nt fly a helicopter in Australia if i was you. They do not keep track of hours in use, which determines a maintenance schedule. Come to the usa Pompano Helicopters I beg your pardon! And don't just quote one accident report from station properties. Whats your reasons for the statement? r * -- dharakos ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Do You Want to Become a Commercial Helicopter Pilot? | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 7 | August 22nd 04 12:00 AM |
Self fly hire in the US | Nigel | Piloting | 25 | March 28th 04 09:20 AM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 6 | February 27th 04 09:11 AM |
Small Sheriff's Departments Using Helicopters | Gig Giacona | Rotorcraft | 23 | September 7th 03 09:52 AM |